dark light

pobjoy pete

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 254 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Malta Sea Gladiators, propeller questions. #1001977
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Glad

    Damm fine machine with any prop !!!!

    in reply to: Suffolk Light Aircraft Crash: One Person Dead #398155
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Finding yourself outside your comfort zone

    It has been touched upon here,but the results of flying on days when the dew point ‘split’ is very close is really quite dangerous;especially if you are neither instrument experienced or equipped.The idea that you can ‘outrun’ fog should be better appreciated.If the airspace you are in reaches the dew point then for a non IFR pilot the results can be fatal.
    The problem is compounded by the resultant loss of a cloud ‘base’ and also that the ‘slant visibility’ can be nil even if you can see directly down.
    Down here in the West Country we always have a high humidity and consequent possibility of fog/low cloud even in the summer.
    In an area that does not suffer from this on a regular basis the ‘suddeness’ of the air around you suddenly condensing out is quite alarming and if you have not planned a diversion that is forecast to stay clear you may have a problem.
    Even the relevent TAF-Metar information may get caught out, but flight on a day with a close split should always be treated with great caution.In very cold weather the situation can be made even more ‘interesting’ if by climbing you reach the ‘freezing level’ before reaching clear air.

    in reply to: Spitfire stops play – just not cricket! #1003729
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    SL574 ‘STUMPS’

    CRAN; This thread was one of the best in 2010-11,and lots of information and images came to light because of it.
    One of the more contentious issues revolved around the ‘stump marks’ on the leading edge of the stb wing.
    This caused a huge ‘secondary’ discussion at the time (we had sorted the actual location by then and even seen a diagram of the fuel system).
    Perhaps you can shed some light on the ‘Stump marks issue’,and anything else that may be of interest with regard to the BoB fleet being operated at the time.
    There was even a request as to who may have been flying the Hurricane at the time.Its only just over 50 years ago so get those memory cells on-line please.

    in reply to: Tempest II G-temp #1006624
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Tempest

    When i was up there a couple of years back the ‘project’ looked very advanced,and i think a ‘spare’ engine was being used to to get some W&B calculations done.
    Compared with the Tempest V the Mk11 was a bit ‘tail heavy’ i believe,as told to me by a former driver of both.
    With four 20mm and 8 rockets it packed quite a punch although the MK11 was a post war variant really.

    in reply to: Spitfire/Hurricane,Can You Tell The Difference? #1009199
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Its only the title heading thats wrong !!!!
    The A team were busy in France well before the BoB.
    The Hurricane,a fighter that fought on all fronts.

    in reply to: Aerodynamic question #2274753
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Auto Stab,and dampers.

    in reply to: Pull out Pin and throw #1015161
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Buried Bits !!!

    I know,it’s a real pain down here.
    When i worked down a tin mine (fact) we were always having to clear away old Merlin and Hercules engines that festooned the place.
    The crated ones caused the most problem as they frequentlly jammed in shafts and blocked ventilation routes.
    If that was’nt bad enough the departing Yanks did the same with jeeps and other equipment that was not going back.
    No one had any thought for the poor miners who were going to have to clear this away eventually.
    I had better not go on about what happened to the ‘Mawgan’ Griffons the Culrose ‘Centaurus’,and the Sea Griffons from the Marine Craft unit at Falmouth,they were not at all suitable for Go-Karts or speedboats.
    Having said that two Pobjoys ‘popped up’ on E-Bay this week,the pair went for £2.5k.

    in reply to: In 50+ years #1016477
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    50 Years !!!!

    Virtual machines at Virtual airshows,and the ability to be part of any aerial activity you choose (virtually of course).
    Historians will be debating whose plastic copy of a replica of a replica is the most authentic, but will need an original ‘isopon p38’ lid to be of any value.

    The Chinese will rediscover the Turbulent and mass produce them, thereby saving the world from virtual boredom.

    Spitfire corner in Cornwall will be a place of pilgrimage for those awaiting news of the finding of original moulds from a genuine MK1.

    Someone will find the remains of my old Aerial Huntmaster in the Kenley woods and claim it is a Bulldog.

    in reply to: Soggy – Your Swallow flies again! #942148
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Perrannporth Swallow

    I seem to recall that one ‘Noel Ellis’ was one of the reasons that Perranporth ‘won’ the Sallow.
    He was still to be seen at the airfield on the odd wednesdays when some of the former GC members meet for lunch.
    That was when ‘lunch’ was available in the Control Tower !!!
    Do you have a contact for him Phil he would be pleased to see you. PC

    in reply to: Old Charts #398600
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Old Charts

    Will be pleased to pass on my 1972 copy when i stop using it.

    in reply to: St Athan. Not open to public collection of the 1990s #949414
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Tiger at St Athan

    Wow where did that Messerschmitt Tiger go; its a real collectors piece !!!!

    in reply to: Arado Ar 234: Why is it neglected? #949418
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    F86 v Mig 15

    We know that GB gave America the Whittle engine and also supplied the Nene to Russia.
    However when the Korean conflict brought the F86 and Mig together in combat,the Mig used a copy of the Nene but the Sabre was using the J47 Axial.
    As always pilot experience was a major factor in combat success,with the Mig having canon and turning ability,and the Sabre improved flight control and systems.
    The engine situation does not seem to have been a factor.

    in reply to: Arado Ar 234: Why is it neglected? #950489
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Jets ‘Who was right’

    They were both correct in their own way.
    Whittle had the foresight to get the Jet Engine into aviation,but our industry did not really have the same enthusiasm to give him an airframe for an operational purpose.
    The Meteor’s ‘hour’ was being able to catch the V1’s,but it was not really a combat or ground attack machine like the Tempest that was needed after the invaision.
    The German scientist’s working on the real ‘development’ of swept wings and podded axials probably knew their war was lost,but just wanted to do their scientist thing anyway.
    The Jet engine was not goiing to shorten the allies war,but the fact that the Germans actually got two operational jet aircraft ‘operational’ despite their desperate situation should have made it a priority to have grabbed a greater share of their boffins.
    We never really caught up after this and is why it was down to the F86 to take on the Migs over Korea.
    We them ‘threw away’ any advantage gained by the FD2, no doubt due to the industry big players being unable to ‘see ahead’ at the time.
    The Camberra really replaced the Mosquito, but could not have lived in the same airspace as Migs and Sabres although a ‘swept & podded’ variant would have been interesting.

    in reply to: Arado Ar 234: Why is it neglected? #950696
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Arado 234

    A good account of bringing several survivors of this type back to the UK after hostilities in Europe finished is in Winkle Browns book (Wings on my sleeve)
    It appears that two of the UK designated machines actually went to the States after some ‘horse trading’.
    With its ‘trike’ uc,podded axials,and an actual operational record it must have been a bit of an eye opener to our boffins at the time.
    I suspect that the lack of examples has something to do with it being rather too good for its time, and no one wanted to be reminded.
    Winkle thought it was great !!!,and eventually the engines would have been sorted.

    in reply to: Isles of Scilly Helicopter service to end #529483
    pobjoy pete
    Participant

    Judicial review (Penzance Heliport)

    The final objection to this saga has been removed ,therefore it appears NO judicial review will be required as to the planning process that took place.
    Penzance was more than just a ‘helipad’ as with its 1200 ft strip and at times several 61’s parked outside it looked more like a mini airport.
    The local MP and Councillors are now doing their ‘stable door’ bit with regard to this loss, but the significance of the situation (and the consequence) has only now dawned upon them.
    No way did Penzance need another supermarket,but seeing 50 years of service going into skips (and dumped) brings home what it would cost to replace.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 254 total)