dark light

Eagle Talon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 114 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2354735
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    Thanks for the advice

    🙂
    There have been reports of a variant of the older J-9 having a chin air intake.
    And since the J-10 project was concieved in 1984, it therefore seems plausible for it to gleened some of that technology from the J-9 (as well as from the Israeli Lavi). Here is another angle of that wind tunnel model.;)

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2354943
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    Can someone that knows identify this early wind tunnel model??

    It might look like a wind tunnel model of the Chengdu J-10; but there are some subtle differences. Take note of the air intake and the wings look like they have compound sweep – a double-delta planform. Plus also note the date (or apparent date) on the image. This date – 1984 – does not match the development period for the J-10:confused:

    in reply to: Fighters that never flew ! your own list #2357234
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    The Chinese cancelled DF-113 Mach 2.5 jet fighter

    Not much is left in the history of the Chinese DF-113 jet fighter of 1958 – 1960, except some photos of the wind tunnel model and some very nice CGI images and one 3-view line drawing. 😉

    in reply to: Fighters that never flew ! your own list #2361183
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    Jaguar M

    One of the best Jaguar variants to have at least conducted intial trials was of course the Jaguar M (M = Marine – or naval) for the French Navy. The Super Etendard beat it out of that race – but in my own personal opinion, the best choice was discarded. These Jaguar M images are via the French magazine FANA 🙂

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2361236
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    A more developed version of the WS-14 is…….

    Listed here only as WS-X. It is a medium thrust class of engine – but more advanced and more fuel efficient than the old WP-7, WP-13 and WP-14 engines – that were based on Russian R-11 and R-13 types

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2361251
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    WS-14 specs ?

    It is in the 13,000 to 15,000 lbs.t category – to replace the WP-13 series in the J-8 and advanced variants of the J-7

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2361327
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    Best translation

    The WS-14; WS-10; WS-15 (core); WS-9; WS-500; and WS-13.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2361331
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    I see your point, but…..

    You have look at the numbers of current J-10s in service and the number of J-11s (Su-27s) and the upcoming J-15s (Su-33 clones). Their numbers are not in the 1,000 range either – but they are very effective machines nonetheless. Like you I feel that the meager number of F-22s are too small for it to handle global needs and US defense responsibilities – but such decisions are left to the politicians to determine – unfortunately. The F-35 is a very capable fighter and attack aircraft in its own right – do not sell it short.:)

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2361335
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    Understanding comparisons

    You do understand that the J-20 and the T-50 PAK FA are only prototypes at this stage – right? While the American F-22 is in full service with the F-35 due sooner than either PAK FA or the J-20.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2361341
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    Yes it does look like the 1.44 – only better !

    The WS-15 engine should allow it to supercruise as well. It is in the 17-ton thrust class – very close to that of the US Pratt & Whitney F119 in thrust.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2361346
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    J-X – XXJ – JXX – or J-20 wind tunnel and engine models

    Not from CCTV nor fan artwork :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2362080
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    Officially released images of what the J-20 looks like

    To me it looks like a re-hashed MiG 1.44 (MiG-39 Flatpack). All Chinese secrecy aside. it was officially released at the Zhuhai Airshow 2010 of just what the 4th generation Chinese air superiority fighter will look like. It also confirms all of the previous rumors of it being based on the Russian MiG 1.44 prototype. 😎 This is official and not just some fanboy artwork. And, it is referred to as a 4th generation fighter, rather than a 5th generation type fighter.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2362237
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    Cockpit of J-20 – (J-X as they refer to it) ????

    I’m not making any claims about the image that I am posting – just posting it as I find that it does not match any J-10 or J-11 variant that I am aware of. The caption only stated that it was “an insider’s first look at the J-X cockpit.” If it is the cockpit of the J-20 test prototype, then it is indeed unusual.:confused:
    It also means that the aircraft does indeed exist and probably has conducted taxi tests in preparation for its first flight.
    It is also not fanboy artwork nor a showroom mockup – it is a real photograph.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2363212
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    J-20 vs T-50 PAKFA (Artwork)

    Though no hostilities between Russia and China are forseen, excellent artwork anyway.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2363214
    Eagle Talon
    Participant

    China has revealed the cockpit as “the 4th generation fighter”

    Here are some images from Zhuhai of the “J-20” cockpit. Plus, a very nicely done artwork of the J-20 confronting the T-50 in the air in the year 2025. Excellent artwork though:) On the cockpit screen it appears that the wing planform of the actual aircraft has more of a diamond planform like the Northrop YF-23 prototype. It’s wing planform should therefore be listed as a modifed delta shape rather than a pure delta.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 114 total)