dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Future UK MPA/ASW aircraft #2288217
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Sorry an MPA Bae 146 fitted out with MRA4 systems is no way the safest most affordable solution! It has disaster written all over it! So we take an elderly second hand airframe that is even smaller and then try and cram systems ripped out of the MRA4 into it! Romantic but fraught with problems!

    I will say it again the recent study recently done within the MOD looking at future manned solutions recommended either C-295 as the minimum solution and the P-8 as the maximum solution available off the shelf! OFF THE SHELF! Just to make that clear! 😀

    Now maybe there is scope in recycling certain components that are low risk onto the C-295 or P-8 like the MAD sensor and optics turrets but to think the Bae-146 is a good solution is absurd! Anyway BAE Systems clearly has no interest in making it! Considering how they were shafted over MRA4 why would they want to have another stab when there are other lower risk solutions available to an MOD and Parliament that clearly remembers how much of a Spinning bow tie extravaganza Nimrod 2000 was!

    http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb240/whisper1983/2q8q4ab.gif

    No government is now going to say we are buying an MPA solution using old airframes, cannibalised parts from a failed project and all integrated by BAE Systems!

    in reply to: UAE and Serbia developing supersonic trainer? #2288506
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I would add to the Swerve, “why would anybody inside Serbia think it worthwhile”.

    It’s not impossible and Serbia is definitely not a third world country with an uneducated workforce but to jump from turboprop COIN aircraft and Super Galeb upgrades to a Supersonic trainer is a bit much.

    Certainly the UAE is not afraid to burn money, I mean they paid for an F-35 wrapped in an F-16’s body! But the whole idea is a bit suspect.

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2288726
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well lets not forget that APA advocated the UK pay for a navalised F-22! Something the USN wasn’t even prepared to do! They also pushed the standard F-22 for the Marine Corps. Or the time they suggested the UK should scrap its Typhoon purchase now and switch to the F-16.

    Basically aside from the F-16 flight of fantasy all APA solutions revolve around the F-22.

    http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-NOTAM-240209-1.html

    in reply to: Russian vs European aviation industry #2289253
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well you live and learn!

    in reply to: Russian vs European aviation industry #2289299
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I think early Su-27 could do a heck of a lot more then what an early Mig-29 could do when it came to radar modes. The Germans were not impressed with their early Mig-29 radars in comparison to their Phantom and that includes those not upgraded with the AN/APG-65. Then again I believe the Indians were far more favourable of the early Mig-29 radar and I wonder if the German experience was coloured by the fact that their experience at unification was with the big twin seat Phantom.

    in reply to: UAE and Serbia developing supersonic trainer? #2289324
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Just for reference this is currently the most significant new aircraft project in Serbia at the moment the UTVA Kobac which is derived from the Lasta-95 with a clear Pilatus PC-7 influence and intended COIN role. Might be attractive to quite a few countries if UTVA can seriously undercut Pilatus.

    P.S. this picture and video are a mock up!

    http://static.trojka.rs/thumbnail/article_medium/slike/srbija/6/kobac_utva_894246085.jpg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxuVQ0a8R4Q

    in reply to: UAE and Serbia developing supersonic trainer? #2289329
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I believe Serbia moved fairly quickly to place people in Iraq who experience of the market and local knowledge of who best to ask in the Iraqi government.

    in reply to: US/UK SSBN news #2009933
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    No evidence in public record office or anywhere else for that matter. Anything you heard from a Royal navy officer down the pub has to be treated with laughter!

    I have spent too much time explaining the evidence to be bothered any further.

    You believe your fantasies if you want I’m done.

    in reply to: US/UK SSBN news #2009941
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Yes it shows how little you have done, the RAF moving Australia or the Island of Gan is a myth. There is no evidence of it in the public records office of such event happening. That you believe this silly myth that has spread across the aviation blogosphere is rather unedifying.

    So if there is no memo saying Polaris was the reason for CVA01 cancellation and a huge body of evidence stating otherwise we have to believe your hunch? Stroll on! Polaris came out of central budgeting not what was allocated to the navy.

    Look I’m wasting my breath, I tried to be respectful of a different opinion all you are clearly interested in is finding a sacrificial lamb to bring up fleet numbers and are making up all sorts of tosh to back your idea.

    in reply to: UAE and Serbia developing supersonic trainer? #2289381
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Don’t worry I agree with you Swerve, I think TooCool is plucking at straws based on a rather erroneous report.

    in reply to: UAE and Serbia developing supersonic trainer? #2289460
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well Swerve was probably being a bit strong worded in saying all skills and documentation have been entirely lost but it is fair to say that the skills fade since their last major jet project is certainly true.

    You are suggesting a supersonic trainer jet as a logical stepping stone for their industry TooCool_12f. That is rather a stretch going on one rather suspect report! Serbian aviation industry is going through a bit of rebirth thanks to Iraq certainly. With contracts to overhaul and update the avionics on Iraqi Mi-17 and the Lasta-95 Serbian aerospace is getting the hard currency to actually renew itself but lets not get ahead of ourselves! Next step is the Turboprop Lasta-95 derivative the Kobac and they appear to be doing some work on upgrading their Soko G-4 Super Galeb with new avionics, mission computers and flight displays.

    Maybe in the future a relaunch of Super Galeb production is on the cards but the LIFT market is saturated as everybody keeps pointing out! Considering the UAE is purchasing the M-346 supersonic trainer they have utterly no need to help develop another one.

    As I said it looks like a reporter misinterpreting the details of some general defence trade negotiations between the countries.

    in reply to: US/UK SSBN news #2009953
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    12-14 conventional submarines plus development of 144 new cruise missiles would cost more and not give the guaranteed second strike capability in under 45 minutes!

    A rolling two weeks deterrent is pointless!

    The decision is made going on reports and the wheels are rolling.

    in reply to: UAE and Serbia developing supersonic trainer? #2289672
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Looking at the report I have a hunch this is a classic case if a reporter misunderstanding the details of general defence talks between two countries.

    So take with a pinch of salt guys!

    Nevertheless Utva is coming leaps and bounds now they have a solid contract for the Lasta-95 and the Turboprop derivative Kobac will start testing next year.

    in reply to: US/UK SSBN news #2009997
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Yes I am John K because unlike you I have actually done some research. There is no evidence that the five fleet carriers were lost due to Polaris. CVA-01 would of cost about £100million pounds according to the treasury whilst one Resolution class submarine cost £40million pounds. Each Polaris missile cost £350 thousand pounds at the time. Total cost of the deterrent was approximately £350 million at 1960’s prices.

    A like for like replacement for five carriers is £500million plus and that is not counting the type 82 Escorts or the airgroups (forgot those didn’t you;)).

    CVA01 was a victim of a cost squeeze certainly and the RAF didn’t help albeit the rumours of the RAF moving Australia are not true and the MOD worked on the principle the Navy would get both CVA01 and TSR2/F-111. Cancellation of both types contry to popular belief was not directly connected. Cancelling one wouldn’t of saved the other.

    Yes anything less then CASD is worthless as it is about the guarantee of retaliation not the system itself as Jonesy pointed out. No other system has the capability to do that.

    I think Invincible and her sisters were worth it I don’t see why you bring that up?

    Replacing Trident is idealogical for the current government, their advisor’s in the MOD will push CASD with Trident successor. The current Labour party have made no sign of changing that if they win the next election.

    Sorry I have said I respect your opinion but I think you are into point scoring hence your rather shrill reply. Best leave it be.

    in reply to: US/UK SSBN news #2010001
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well sorry John K, as far as I am concerned you are wrong on many levels from thinking that Polaris cost the navy the strike carriers to thinking there isn’t any threat post cold war.

    There is and CASD with submarine based ballistic missiles IS cutting our coat according to our cloth. Any other solution is not worth it or waaaaay to expensive!

    You are right this is a waste of time…

    Time will see but if we keep a nuclear capability it will be CASD with ballistic missiles I assure you.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 5,046 total)