dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,666 through 1,680 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2013227
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Oh I totally agree that PoW or QE is pretty much a non starter. As for an interim carrier I think we are five years too late.

    If five years ago India had put in a serious bid for Invincible, PdA or Chakri Naruebet then I think it might of been worthwhile as an interim solution. Now that they are months away from getting INS Vikramaditya and INS Viraat has had a SLEP to allow service through to 2020 with her remaining SHAR the investment in another interim carrier seems a bit needless. Even a hot swap of PdA requires some kind of work up and I think they are going to have their hands full crewing INS Vikramaditya through induction trials alongside INS Viraat. Actually in that respect I think they might even be a bit lucky that INS Vikrant has been delayed.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2013302
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I just don’t think the Indian naval air service would regard inducting AV8B or PdA worth it considering the time frames. Just an opinion 😉

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2013310
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    India’s Naval Air Service is busy enough inducting the Mig-29 at the moment! Trying to induct the AV-8B would be yet another burden for frankly little return, by the time they were inducted and fully worked up the pilots would have to go over to the Mig anyhow.

    The AV-8B is a very different beast to their Sea Harrier, pulling pilots out of the Mig-29 work up program, active Sea Harrier squadron or the Tejas-N development program is wasteful.

    The Viraat is going to slog on a few more years and they have enough Sea Harrier upgraded to maintain a token capability. If we are suggesting Italian or Spanish AV-8B then the wait to get them, plus an overhaul and inducting them takes you to the Sea Harrier retirement date pretty much.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2337355
    Fedaykin
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2337530
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    From an upcoming movie about the Geronimo raid

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-kdldpJaVGiY/UCQgRla0cvI/AAAAAAAALdU/vga7cXk4pQA/s1600/HELO+NO+IDENT+QUIZAS+PELICULA+ZERO+DARTH+THIRTY.jpg

    You know what it reminds me of 😀

    http://airwing.uplink.com.au/bluethunder/images/media/20_1_L_00010008b.jpg

    in reply to: RAF Tornado retirement set #2337650
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    It’s not like ALARM is Tornado specific.

    Typhoon equipped with ASRAAM, ALARM, Storm Shadow and GBU-16 weapons
    http://www.deagel.com/library/Typhoon-equipped-with-ASRAAM-ALARM-Storm-Shadow-and-GBU-16-weapons_m02006120700276.aspx

    Tornado equipped with ALARM, Brimstone, drop tanks, and counter measure dispensers looks good, but nowhere near as menacing as my last Typhoon link.
    http://www.deagel.com/library/Tornado-equipped-with-Brimstone-and-ALARM_m02006120700319.aspx

    Well that is true, ALARM could of been integrated onto other types. That they have hung it on the wings of the Typhoon is indeed true but it hasn’t been integrated.

    I believe the plan was to integrate ALARM onto Typhoon but it was pulled from the development plan. Another thing to note is by the time Typhoon has to take over as an interim solution the ALARM rounds in stock will be fairly elderly. That means they will need rebuilding or replacing, whilst the system is the gold standard when it comes to SEAD it is based on 80s technology. So its either a capability holiday or adopt something different. The reason why I suggested AASM as an interim solution on Typhoon and AARGM as the long term solution on the F35B is the integration onto the platforms is already being paid for by other countries. AASM can do other stuff as well and AARGM does much of what ALARM does. That means we can do a simpler release to service for the RAF, it also might entice the French to finalise getting Brimstone for their Rafale as a quid pro quo!

    It has been noted that AARGM is being made from recondition HARM rounds but I don’t see that as a show stopper, Raytheon offers it as a product and when the UK wanted new build tube launched Tomahawk that was technically out of production they got it in Block IV configuration.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2013370
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I know it’s not easy. That’s exactly why the “all the problems have been solved, everything will now run smoothly” line is ridiculous.

    But that doesn’t exonerate those managing the programme. The original schedule was unachievable.

    The “we’ve got it under control” attitude is part of the problem, IMO. There’s a failure to face up to the difficulties, causing them to be addressed later than they should be. The stupidly optimistic schedule is a symptom of that counter-productive over-optimism. More realism (which would have meant accepting a slower schedule) would have resulted in faster progress.

    And it’s still going on.

    As for the PoW, that’s just plain stupid. It’s in the Kitty Hawk category. I was 100% right on that (& I don’t recall any apologies for the attacks I was at the receiving end of from those who believed the fantasy), & I’m right on this.

    I think the issue is endemic when it comes to large indigenous technology procurement programs in India. Its a very similar story with Tejas and Arjun…

    in reply to: RAF Tornado retirement set #2338172
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The F.3s have been retired, my best mates Dad works at Tabuk and they went in Part-Ex for the Tiffies

    That’s interesting, presumably they are going into the parts reclamation program for the GR4 fleet. If that is the case UK tax payer is getting a good deal!

    in reply to: PLAN News Thread #4 #2013386
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Some truly amazing pictures on China Defence Blog of a model of the Ex-Varyag! Its huge, either that is one enthusiastic model maker or its been commissioned for the China navy to be displayed somewhere! Considering the accurate detail and the nice base it sits on I am more inclined to think the latter. What is interesting is it gives a very nice close up snap shot of possible operations on the carrier!

    My gut feeling as is suggested in the article is she will get named during the 85th anniversary of the founding of the PLA, or before the October 1 National Day.

    Anyhow behold:

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-efaZISrVHEA/UCMbK7dNeLI/AAAAAAAAQKU/U2b3e-hHln8/s1600/Varyag%2Bmodel%2B4.jpg

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-v-616U4SywI/UCMbJxxjgdI/AAAAAAAAQJw/FzUlxyXu2oI/s1600/Varyag%2Bmodel%2B1.jpg

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--JJebB5kO3Q/UCMbKOUkBmI/AAAAAAAAQJ8/Obm8ExviYOo/s1600/Varyag%2Bmodel%2B2.jpg

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-h0w-p-xrlmc/UCMbKTnXvDI/AAAAAAAAQKI/5qqgkzO_44k/s1600/Varyag%2Bmodel%2B3.jpg

    http://china-defense.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/they-have-yet-to-name-that-aircraft.html

    in reply to: RAF Tornado retirement set #2338584
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Interesting concept Sintra;)

    in reply to: Tornados – Now and the future #2338632
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Doubt it, the RAF only got a HMD for Tornado GR4 as part of a recent UOR for Afghanistan. They adapted the technology for the Typhoon HMD an dput it on the standard Tornado helmet.

    in reply to: RAF Tornado retirement set #2338852
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    So the RAF will have the bare minimum of fast jet resources I think we can agree.

    It will be interesting to see if future fast jet UAV units are in addition to the manned fleet or instead of. After all it is highly likely that by the time the JCA is operational in any serious numbers, the UCAV arm of the RAF will be much more real.

    The trend in the MOD is for each weapon to magnify the effect of the single aircraft carrying it. I think it likely that the bulk of the fleet will have a high degree of commonality and be able to carry out all the missions required of it (particularly if the early Typhoons are retired some time after the Tornado).

    And I agree, it is a huge shame that we will see the end of the Tornado.

    I think that is a fair appraisal!

    Basically we are talking a capability holiday, retiring GR4 in 2019 rather then 2025 as most expected will leave gaps.

    F35B will not be fully worked up and Typhoon will be stretched as it is supporting North/South QRA and Falklands 1435 flight.

    The public will be told that Typhoon will pick up a minimum capability extending from P1E. So Brimstone and Storm Shadow plus more Paveway variants is logical. The RAF will probably get some other stuff funded like the AESA because of this. I wouldn’t be surprised if the RAPTOR pod comes over, Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup alluded to that possibility years ago. Considering they are paid its logical to move them over.

    The main capability holiday is SEAD, ALARM retires with GR4 as far as I am aware. There have been talk of some METEOR variant but I see a capability holiday as more likely. Other options is to:

    a) Develop new missile.
    b) Integrate HARM on Typhoon
    c) Adopt SAGEM AASM Hammer, its already being integrated on Saudi Typhoon and the French use it in the SEAD role.
    d) Accept capability holiday and then adopt the AGM-88E Advanced Anti Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) on the F35B.

    I actually find a combination of c) and d) most attractive! AARGM appears to hold many of the capabilities of ALARM with the Italians and Americans paying for F35 integration. Waiting for that and making a limited purchase of SAGEM AASM Hammer as a limited interim solution for Typhoon seems logical.

    in reply to: Exercise Pitch Black 2012 #2338962
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    When did Vin Diesel turn up?

    in reply to: RAF Tornado retirement set #2339169
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    or in the messes, God, messes are the best places on earth, even God would be impressed if he went in one 🙂

    Hmmmm, this is how RAF PR like to portray service messes:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EXqGD0SEEs

    The reality!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfIpBFEXXfk

    in reply to: RAF Tornado retirement set #2339211
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Am I the only one sad to hear the date is sooner than expected? I love the Tonka, and I think it is a phenomenal airplane…especially in its current GR.4 incarnation. (Are non-Brits like me allowed to refer to it as the Tonka?)

    You are allowed 😉

    But you have to drink warm English ale for a week in the squadron bar!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,666 through 1,680 (of 5,046 total)