dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,086 through 2,100 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35, third restructure in three years #2366355
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Pretty much anything that is on the Airpower Australia is rabidly anti F35. Carlo Kopp and Peter Goon are almost like a scratched record on the matter.

    Take what they have to write with a pinch of salt.

    in reply to: Is the UK getting cold feet? #2366949
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Nope Jack, money has been put down now for the EMALS and AAG set. There isn’t going to be another U-turn.

    in reply to: Is the UK getting cold feet? #2366962
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Why not share the carriers with the French, the UK supplies the ships, France supplies the Rafales and both crew a carrier each!!

    Its so simple and would cement the UK and French commitments made last year.

    ( This is a no fee idea, but a knighthood would be acceptable.)

    Actually the deal signed early last year between France and the UK pretty much agreed to that concept. The Rafale and Hawkeye of the Aeronavale should be fairly common visitors to PoW. Likewise F35C will certainly visit the CdG albeit light loaded due to weight issues.

    Its a pretty good deal for both sides really. UK gets French help standing up carrier operations and the French don’t have to go through the hassle of sending their aircraft to the US when CdG is going through an overhaul. It will be very interesting to see how the French E2 Hawkeye fit into QE class operations.

    in reply to: Is the UK getting cold feet? #2367089
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well I think people are jumping to conclusions here people!

    I haven’t seen any rumors or official statements about an F35C tailhook issue. If there is an issue we don’t know how much leeway to fix it easily, it might be an anticipated issue with planned fixes or something new that will be pricey…until I see something official then I am regarding this as a fantasy problem dreamed up by one of the many F35 detractors out there! For all we know the tailhook if this is a problem wasn’t adjusted properly and it requires a tweek taking a few minutes…

    Also this isn’t just about carrier strike! The other customer the RAF very much want F35C as its the closest to their old manned FOAS concepts. I doubt the RAF have any interest in inducting the Rafale in that role albeit they might be sold on the Super Hornet.

    Of course the wild card in all of this os the X-47B which has been plodding through testing without many issues. For the RAF it looks rather close to the unmanned aspects of FOAS and I could see them rather liking it as a trade off for accepting Super Hornet. Also another thing that might buy off the RAF is a purchase of the Boeing P8, integrate Storm Shadow on it and alongside the Voyager tankers the RAF gets back a global strike capability…something to get many an Air Vice Marshall excited!

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2367923
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Ah that’s perfect then…buy both helicopters!:D

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2368059
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    W-3 Is a fairly small helicopter so I can understand why they might be interested in something new, also it should be noted that PZL is a United Technologies company and produces the S-70 Blackhawk.

    http://www.pzlmielec.pl/en/offer/products/sikorsky-s70i/general-description/

    in reply to: New Saudi F-15s #2368585
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Actually another Sniper question as well, now the GR7/9 are going to the USMC what is going to happen to the Sniper pods purchased for them under a UOR? I think it was hung off a GR4 at some point but it seems a waste to retire them.

    in reply to: New Saudi F-15s #2368586
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Brain f@rt moment but wasn’t the Saudi Tornado upgrade done with the Thales Damocles pod due to them not being able to use Litening 3 or Sniper? Just interesting considering Sniper is part of this F-15 contract.

    in reply to: MMRCA news thread 10 #2368697
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Don’t get the Champagne out yet Rafale fan brigade. No anouncement has been made…looks like a fantasy headline to me.

    in reply to: Hawker P.1154 #2300707
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Fascinating, I didn’t realise they intended to use a catapult assisted take off. Interesting to see the American style nose gear launch bar.

    in reply to: Rafale news XII #2301015
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Ah ! the evil rafale brigade … Like it or not politics played a role if you followed this competition and it was stated by the swiss themselves. Now yes the gripen is a pragmatic choice as regards politics and finance and it will do the job fine, just it was not the favored option of the swiss air force. They thought they could do the same job with less aircrafts for approx the same amount of money.

    Better find a tin foil hat then…

    in reply to: Virgin Atlantic bid for bmi #557711
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    For me I hope they keep the Glasgow/Edinburgh service from East Midlands Airport. I live in Loughborough and work as a trainer for an education services company, we have a number of contracts in Scotland and being able to fly from EMA saves lots of hassle!

    in reply to: Rafale news XII #2301092
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    enough budget was allocated to buy any of the three contenders.

    Of course when you don’t follow the choice of your airforce after a thorough phase of tests you will bring this type of arguments. That does not mean those arguments are not valid but those arguments are not “performance” related as this was the job of the swiss air force unlike sign suggested.

    The core reason is certainly political after all the issue the swiss had with France and Germany over its banking system. Choosing the gripen is an act of independence toward its to powerful neighbors. Add to that a “context” of crisis that would make less politically acceptable the purchase of a more costly aircraft and you have very good reasons to go for the gripen which in the end is still a good choice for switzerland considering their low threat environment.

    And here come all the excuses from the Rafale fan brigade! Its always political or a stitch up when Rafale fails to win a contest!

    Anybody would think the Gripen was barely more capeable then the F5 going on what the Rafale fans fan chorus are saying! OK the Rafale performed best within Swiss requirements and technically they could afford it…doesn’t matter! The Gripen in any variant let alone the one offered is vastly superior to the current F5 and its cheaper then the other fighters on offer. Except for the cannon and AIM9X (a minor integration issue) it can carry the same munitions already in Swiss service and has an engine derived from the F404 already in Swiss Hornets.

    Throwing politics in as the main excuse is weak to say the least, the contest has been going on for years and French/Swiss relations are still perfectly fine despite recent issues with the banks…certainly not enough to derail defence procurement decisions.

    Frankly the Swiss have to be commended for going for the cheaper pragmatic choice…just the same as the Omanis recently rejecting Typhoon and purchasing more F16.

    in reply to: Knowing what we know now, what would you do different. #2028013
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Simple answer is NO!

    SSDR put paid to that, frankly the navy was VERY lucky to keep both Albion class and three of the Bay! Pre-SSDR rumors were very much one Albion and two Bay would go.

    When HMS Ocean is paid off the crew and role will go to the QE class, I’m sure the RN would of liked to keep a dedicated LPH but getting QE class and retaining the Albion and most of the Bays was more important.

    in reply to: F-35A for Japan #2301430
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    That such an asinine comment could be made in public casts doubt on the seriousness of the whole process.

    Agreed whilst it was nice to see Typhoon short listed this was pretty much in the bag for the F35. The JASDF is very US-centric and only really interested in a low observable airframe. Once it became clear that the F22 was off the table they went through this face saving exercise of a selection process.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,086 through 2,100 (of 5,046 total)