dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,431 through 2,445 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Maritime C130 patrol aircraft for UK? #2386984
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    It would take too long to get into operation to be an interim solution until a real MPA is purchased. The real design and qualification work would take years even using components sourced from the defunct MRA4 project.

    An interim solution would be taking P3 Orion out of AMARG or as a hot swap from the USN.

    in reply to: Maritime C130 patrol aircraft for UK? #2387298
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well there is no doubt that the C130 can make an excellent MPA as proven by the USCG C130. Its tough, has huge endurance, plenty of room to carry rafts and workstations. Problem is C130 is leaving UK service so means retaining an orphan type.

    It does bring up the issue that SAR support and general maritime patrol, fisheries protection work should be done by the UK Coastguard using an aircraft leased on some form of power by the hour arrangement – something that the UK Coast Guard agency already does with its current fleet of aircraft. Something like a long range business jet would suit.

    in reply to: argentinian air force #2387302
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Yep it would only make matters worse handing West Falkland to the Argentinians. You would certainly expect a flood of patriotic immigrants to Isla Gran Malvina as it would be called fully supported by the Argentine Government. They would certainly build a large settlement (settlements) plus airport/airbase and a harbour regardless of the landscape or logistic issues, very rapidly there would be far more Argentinians on West Falkland vs Falkland Islanders on East Falkland. You would then very quickly have all sorts of tit for tat problems over airspace and the local waters, the UK would also have to massively increase the defenses on East Falkland as well as re-site both radars as it would in effect take away all of Argentina’s logistic problems if they made an aggressive move towards the rest of the Islands. Also as Swerve already pointed out it would send out a very clear message to the Argentine people that British resolve over the matter was weakening giving an excuse to be more aggressive in their demands.

    No it is far better to politely ignore Argentina’s colonial ambitions and maintain the diplomatic stand point of respecting the Falkland Islanders right to self determination.

    Actually one of the fears of the British military before the end of the Falklands war was the UN declaring a cease fire whilst there was a significant number of Argentine troops on West Falkland.

    in reply to: Maritime C130 patrol aircraft for UK? #2387310
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well its not that surprising Marshalls have had a punt at selling this idea. They have done that sort of thing before for example converting more Tristar to keep refueling capacity up until the a330 arrives.

    Frankly its a non starter with the C130K going out of service end of next year and the C130J having their OSD brought forward.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2000944
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I only think we can pull that to some degree, the Americans know that EMALS is the most realistic solution within the time frame. That said I think EMALS would pretty much be sold at cost price, its a bespoke item rather then mass produced. General Atomics will be looking at making money with through life support.

    in reply to: argentinian air force #2310542
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    There are many countries who wouldn’t consider a Russian or Chinese fighter purchase due to how they see themselves in the world. I would call it pride rather then delusion.

    in reply to: argentinian air force #2310563
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    How about going all Swedish and opting for the Gripen? There may be earlier surplus airframes from the Swedes that could be upgraded for the immediate future, and then opting for perhaps license assembly of Gripen NG? If funds allow, perhaps throw in a few Erieyes as well?

    Significant British content in all Gripen variants makes it a bit difficult.

    in reply to: argentinian air force #2310573
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well I think there are two main reasons for Argentina’s aversion for going Russian when it comes to fighters.

    The first that Buitreaux has already alluded to is psychological, the Argentine airforce regards itself as a modern Western “NATO style” air arm. Procuring Russian (or Chinese) doesn’t fit with that picture.

    The second is more practical, it would involve introducing a completely different logistic and support base.

    in reply to: argentinian air force #2311518
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Buitreaux is from Argentina and has a good handle of the current status of their Airforce so it might be worth popping him a PM.

    From what I know the Mirage have gone through modernisation through the years, in particular a cockpit upgrade after the Falklands war mainly using French components. They are purely WVR only and I don’t know about a ground attack capability for the III. The simple fact is the airframes are very close to time expiring now with out a very deep rebuild, maybe along the lines of what PAC KAMRA does. Not that Argentina would be interested. As for new fighters they refuse to consider Chinese or Russian preferring a French solution at this time. Gripen is pretty much counted out due to the significant UK content as is Typhoon. They are not interested in F16 but expressed some interest in Super Hornet apparently. They have been keen to get some Mirage 2000 as France starts to retire them and stories of a purchase of surplus Jordanian Mirage F1 appears to be unfounded.

    The Skyhawks are LGB capable but serviceability hasn’t been great in recent years.

    Don’t know anything about the Pampas.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2001168
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I’m putting this here rather then start a new thread, I suggest you have a very stiff drink before you look at the pictures in the article:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2003673/Falklands-War-hero-HMS-Invincible-goes-knackers-yard.html

    in reply to: Naval Apache returns #2001171
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    As far as a heavier missile, why?

    Totally agree, Hellfire can still kill pretty much everything on the battle field. It should be noted that before Desert Storm the Americans got worried about the Iraqis em-placing their T72 behind large soil banks. They did a test to see what would happen and found Hellfire was still able to utterly destroy its target.

    in reply to: British Harriers sold to US Marines #2311697
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    sheesh,

    the Harriers are getting a bit totemic aren’t they?

    Earlier this week we are told they would have solved Libya on their own, and now they will bring down the government?!

    Its getting undignified.

    I agree the Harriers have become a totemic issue, if they had been available I doubt things would be much different now.

    The truth is NATO attacked two weeks too late, if strikes had started when there was fighting in Tripoli and there was talk of Gadaffi fleeing the country then the regime would of toppled. Frankly unless he is taken out by a lucky shot Gadaffi is fairly safe in Tripoli, as for the rebels they will be in no position to apply proper pressure for a long time.

    in reply to: British Harriers sold to US Marines #2312111
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    If the Marine Corp are getting them nobody hold any illusions about them flying again. There is significant avionics differences between a GR7/9 and an AV8B/+, if they are going to America they will be parted out to keep the current AV8B fleet alive. Certainly major airframe and engine components would be useful to the Americans.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2001256
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    We did try and flog a couple of Type 45 to Saudi Arabia but they didn’t bite.

    I think it was along the lines of seven and eight going to them which would of helped fund nine and ten going to the RN allowing a force of eight.

    in reply to: Boeing KC-46 #2313737
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Yeah I would say a center of gravity of issue as well, certainly interesting if they are doing that at this stage.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,431 through 2,445 (of 5,046 total)