dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,246 through 4,260 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Japan to consider F/A-22 to replace its F-4s #2516293
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I think the biggest mistake made by the Boeing camp was to cease the availability of the C/D model Hornet. If it had been retained in production alongside the Super Hornet I have no doubts that some orders that had gone to rivals like the F16 and Gripen might of gone Boeings way. If Boeing had wanted to make more space available for Super Hornet production then I’m sure they could of moved sub assembly production to other countries (Valmet in Finland springs to mind!).

    Just look at the F16, its still receiving orders now despite its age, the continuous integration of newer avionics that has been seen with the Falcon could of been done with the Hornet.

    in reply to: Russia 'renewing bomber patrols' #2517436
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Oh what the hell lets have the Buc as well!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvrmWg1wFoE&mode=related&search=

    in reply to: Russia 'renewing bomber patrols' #2517440
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I know its not really to do with the thread but here is a cool video from 1435 flight:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI-U3-9UO0w

    Sadly I doubt we are going to see as many of these cool videos now that the MOD has banned the release of this kind of video.

    Shooting themselves in the foot! French air force recruitment has gone up over the last year because of the footage released on youtube of there operations with a suitably funky soundtrack!

    P.S. I didn’t know that you needed an XBOX controller for air to air refueling:D !

    in reply to: Russia 'renewing bomber patrols' #2517452
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well whilst we are all talking about the rebirth of the old Bear and RAF QRA here is a video I found of the good old days!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8h_c3rzXlA

    in reply to: Russia 'renewing bomber patrols' #2518169
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    RAF QRA(I) never stopped after the end of the cold war, though most intercepts are now airliners with comms problems post 9/11.

    nice to see you again BIGVERN! I know QRA never stopped but Bears must be more exciting then a lost airliner for the boys in flight gear!

    Anyway I have a great deal of respect for someone like you who experianced the very scary but maybe exciting period when the cold war hotted up again in the 80’s.

    Frankly these recent probing flights by the Russians are win win for both sides! The Russians get the chance to show that they are still big boys and the RAF/USAF get some good practice at QRA.

    in reply to: Project 17A Frigate for India #2050651
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Actually I would argue that after that glut of new pictures up to early last year the release of new pictures of Chinese ship building has dried up a bit.

    There have been no good pictures of Varyag recently and anything good has tended to come from state media over recent months.

    in reply to: Lafayette armed ASTER anti-air system #2050654
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The ROCN had no choice when it came to the systems fit of their LaFayette, they were delivered lacking much of the standard electronics fit forcing them to cobble together a mutant hybrid fit of French, American and local systems. Hence the rather odd choice of Chaparral among other things.

    On the other hand even with the procurement scandal surrounding the frigate purchase beggers can’t be choosy and the deal did tie in with the real prize which was the Dassault Mirage 2000 which was delivered with a comprehensive systems and missile fit.

    in reply to: Type 45 according to The Telegraph #2050657
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Yes certainly the best solution considering the limited pot of money, anyway don’t forget the Type22 and 23 which all carry Harpoon.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2518664
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I get a feeling we are not going to see any official drawings or concepts prior to the official roll out.

    I have a hunch that we are going to get a very flashy launch with lots of big wigs and officials.

    I think there is a good chance that India could join the PAK-FA program but not China. Its clear to me that the Russian Sukhoi purchase was a stop gap measure by China and they are more interested in developing their own next generation fighter program.

    Actually we have more idea of what the Chinese next generation fighter program will look like then PAK-FA. We do actually have some official images from China via Sinodefence.com and CCTV of potential next generation fighter models (J-12 and J-13) being tested in wind tunnels/computer modeling .

    in reply to: Lafayette armed ASTER anti-air system #2051120
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Just checked!

    Everything is as stated above but forgot Singapore who also use ASTER, they also use Harpoon instead of Exocett as well.

    With Taiwan the TC-2 Sky Sword air to air missile has been touted as an upgrade over the obsolete Chaparral system using some form of VLS. If I was Taiwan I would of adapted the rail launcher of the Cahaparral naval system to take TC-2 aam rounds as a short term stop gap to give a moderate improvement in area air defence capability.

    in reply to: Lafayette armed ASTER anti-air system #2051125
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    who can tell me has the Lafayette FFG armed the Lafayette?

    I think the French initially used Crotale Naval whilst Taiwan uses Chaparral Naval (utter joke! might as well throw stones) and the Saudis use Aster 15.

    I will just do a quick check as to where the class stands now.

    in reply to: Type 45 according to The Telegraph #2051129
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The RN originally accepted a lot of “fitted for but not with” in order to get 12 hulls, then it was cut to 8 and they may end up with 6, a far cry from the famous the navy wanted 6, the treasury offered 4 and they compromised on 8 row over battleships before WW1. Makes me wonder what the RN would have pushed for 10 years ago if they’d known the government would fail to honour their part of the bargain, was a bit naive of the RN ever to swallow that whole cuts now for jam tomorrow BS IMO.

    Yeah the cuts today for jam tomorrow BS had train wreck written all over it!

    As for the main stream press they very rarely get millitary technical details correct, in the end a newspaper or program might have a defence correspondant but they rarely have any true interest in millitary equipment.

    in reply to: Boyd's E-M Theory #2518674
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Boyd’s basic thoughts (before he expanded his theory) are very close to what Erich Hartmann said about air-to-air combat. Wonder if Boyd knew Hartmann.

    Yeah Eric Hartmann is one of several people who came to the same conclusions prior to Boyd. Not that it should take anything away from Boyds work! His work on E-M should be regarded as a seminal piece of the air combat jigsaw.

    in reply to: Russia 'renewing bomber patrols' #2518675
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Ahhh QRA!

    Back to the good old days!

    in reply to: Army helecopter crash #2520667
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The AW149 will be built in Italy. The UK factory will be the primary build plant for future EH101’s and the forthcoming ‘super’ Lynx for the Uk. Just thought I’de let you know!
    Dave

    Strange…I’m sure when Augusta launched the AW149 the UK was the intended build location.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,246 through 4,260 (of 5,046 total)