dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Why is the Golden Eagle more successful than the JF-17? #2225102
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    JangBoGo it is Christmas day, I don’t suppose you could chill out a bit?

    in reply to: Japan Self-Defense Forces – News & Discussion – Season 1 #2225119
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Good chance for a US-2 sale to India as well soon.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2225332
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    To be honest that chart is a classic example of the dangers of statistics and sales people. How do you define capability? What is important and not? How do you prioritise?

    in reply to: Why is the Golden Eagle more successful than the JF-17? #2225407
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Can I have that in English please.

    in reply to: Why is the Golden Eagle more successful than the JF-17? #2225489
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Vnomad provided a very simple source using Klimov data:

    GE-F414-400

    Thrust – 98,000N
    Weight – 1,150kg

    Klimov RD-33MK

    Thrust – 88,000N
    Weight – 1100-1200kg

    The F414 has a better power to weight ratio then the RD-33MK, even if we talk about projected variants of the RD-33 for as of yet unsold Mig-29 variants or the derivative RD-93 the F414 has an advantage not forgetting that GE is still improving the performance of that engine.

    Anyway this is a discussion about the exportability of the JF-17 which is primarily hamstrung by the lack of domestic Chinese engine. Now don’t get me wrong the WS-13 has plenty to prove and it is fair to say we should take projected performance figures with a big pinch of salt.

    On a side note wan’t there an agreement in the last year that the Ukraine would co-develop an equivalent power-plant to the RD-93/WS-13?

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2225824
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Sweden, that is what rented means.

    in reply to: Why is the Golden Eagle more successful than the JF-17? #2225899
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    T50 might well be a better choice technically (and I think that is debatable) but quite a few of the countries that China traditionally has sold J-7 to are not going to be authorised for some of the US ITAR items the T50 uses.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2225906
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Not entirely surprised, the Chinese have loved their Blackhawk. Wonder what the powerplant is. Spare CT7 or something else.

    in reply to: Why is the Golden Eagle more successful than the JF-17? #2225908
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Still a market for that kind of jet, remember CAC have only just finished servicing orders for the J-7. The main issue is the engine currently, my gut feeling why the Russians allowed the RD-93 purchase to go through despite the engines being intended for an export fighter is the Chinese are still buying large numbers of engines for domestic use. The Mig-29 was never going to be purchased by Pakistan so the Russians were not losing out on a potential export sale.

    There has been a fair amount of interest from Asia, Africa and South America from several nations. Those nations are all Mirage-III, Mig-21, J-7 or F-5 operators. But all those nations are potential customers for the Mig-29/35 or Su-27/30.

    in reply to: Why is the Golden Eagle more successful than the JF-17? #2226216
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I lower the hook into the water and a JSR shaped fish bites, then I reel it in.

    So predictable it is almost boring.

    Oh I can’t be mean at Christmas, here have a listen to Katushya for a while JSR

    in reply to: Why is the Golden Eagle more successful than the JF-17? #2226242
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well lucky JSR for future JF-17 buyers they will be able to purchase the more powerful WS-13 replacing the obsolete Russian RD-93.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2034184
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    +1 Blitzo has said pretty much everything I would.

    All I can add is the Brazilian help as I understand it was allowing some China Navy officers onto the Sao Paulo to observe operations. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Brazilian navy did a few lectures to those officers as well.

    The other thing I wouldn’t really pass judgement on where the Chinese are with this all until 2020 at least, 2015 is just too soon imho considering all the work that has to be done.

    What we do know is the initial J-15 production batch is starting to be delivered and the first regular China Navy pilots qualified on them. The initial flights and landings were performed by effectively test pilots flying prototypes. Also some information has already started to trickle from the China Navy in respect of what they have already learned. For example they have made some small changes in deck procedure in respect of what the shooter does when launching the aircraft. Apparently the way they signalled the launch was slightly confusing to other deck personnel, they changed it then released the information to the press. So hardly signs of a navy so embarrassed by what their deck personnel are up to that they would get into an incident with a USN warship.

    Night landings and launches are probably waaaaaaay down the priority list when working up their air wing. I have a friend who was a deck crewman on the old Ark Royal in the 1970’s, he gets shivers when you mention duskers to him! There are a few real carrier veterans on this forum who would tell you the same.

    Ten years ago the China navy was still really a coastal defence force taking its very first steps into Blue Water operations. Just deploying a frigate and support ship to help with anti piracy operations off Somalia was a real logistical and operational challenge for them. They have taken a part complete wreck of a carrier that every serious expert stated was effectively scrap and refitted it, they built a complete land based replica of that carrier to train their crews. They are certainly determined but to read anything into their progress or assume that the Chinese are controlling information due to embarrassment is absurd. Also bare in mind the USN has approximately 90 years of carrier operation experience and doctrine to draw upon. The Chinese are going from a cold start but using information gleaned from other countries. Carrier operations are pretty much the top tier of what can be done militarily at sea, it takes time to develop those skills and China has been doing for a matter of months.

    in reply to: Brazil closer to Boeing on jets deal after Biden visit #2227417
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The A-7 would have been just fine off her. the French Navy considered the Type in 1973 when JagM was cancelled but (as usual) went with a national design. I dont think the Brazilian Navy ever looked at the A-7 as there were none around that hadnt been flown to death and werent worn out. The A-4KUs were available and had barely been used and had not done any carrier cycles.

    Well lets just agree to disagree on the suitability of the A-7E for the Sao Paulo. There were A-7E and A-6E with plenty of cat and trap cycles left in AMARG that could of been overhauled.

    Nevertheless the A-4KUs were the best choice.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2034239
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    In my opinion I feel that the PLAN is embarrassed for the world to see how little progress they are making in their carrier aviation program and the Cowpens taking pictures would reveal that fact. Going beyond the carefully controlled release of information by Chinese sources is something the PLAN loathes but is going to have to accept as they sail beyond their coastal areas.

    Oh not this all over again, this is just the same as your analysis based upon the shoes they were wearing on deck. What pictures the Cowpens could take would be little more then what we can already see on Youtube of the Liaoning.

    The Americans if they were intelligence gathering will be interested in the signals data they can gather. The Cowpens will be there listening with her electronic systems trying to get a picture of the radars and radios operated by the Chinese carrier, also they will be using their radar to get an understanding of flight patterns around the carrier.

    Understandably that is not exactly the kind of intelligence gathering the Chinese will be keen on. Also China is actively laying a stake to the South China seas, the US sending a Ticonderoga class destroyer through the area and close to their ships on exercise with their newest strategic asset is going to garner a response. This is nothing to do with them being embarrassed, this is geopolitics at play along with a desire to protect some of their secrets when it comes to the performance of their vessels.

    in reply to: Brazil closer to Boeing on jets deal after Biden visit #2228018
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The A-7 would have no problem operating off the Sao Paulo. The A-6……….would. The A-4KUs were more of a deal at the time.

    Not as I understand it, A-7E would of been marginal to unsafe on the Sao Paulo.

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 5,046 total)