There was this picture of a dark Su-35 going vertical covered in vapours like a demon rising from hell. Can anyone post it please ?
Sukhoi facility on full throttle
The Sukhoi (Su-30 MKI) engine facility is a marvel by itself with some of the gen-next technologies already being used, including a robotic welding system. Speaking to OneIndia, Rajaram Mohanty, Officiating General Manager (Sukhoi Engine Divison), said that a total of 23 engines have been made from the raw material phase now. “The division has so far manufactured close to 280 engines (AL-31FP) for the Sukhois, while around 158 have been overhauled. The first engine from the raw material phase was rolled out during 2011-12. We are also fully equipped for the long testing (three months) of Sukhoi engines,” says Rajaram. The TBO (Time Between Overhaul) of a Sukhoi engine is 1000 hours, while the total lifespan of an engine is 2000 hours. HAL hopes that it will be able to generate more employment when the Indo-Russian Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) project takes a firm shape.
Read more at: http://www.oneindia.com/feature/hal-propels-fortunes-koraput-engine-division-with-gen-next-projects-1590744.html
i think AWACS will be the first to receive laser defense,
they got power generation, cooling, and space for it, not to mention the value of them
More like lack of power. They already have enough add on APUs anyways.
Does this mean that the Ka-226T has been chosen as the LUH without a new competition?
Both LUH and Ka-226 would be built and the deal to build Mi-17/Ka is not limited to Indian armed forces but also for civilian and export customers ( atleast the video if Modi/Putin press conf says so )
Nothing new in the proposal. Russian Helicopters has a tie up with Elcon (Sun group company) to produce Helicopters in India. Their plant was supposed to come up in the Delhi-NCR region. It hasn’t moved beyond that. From what I understand, the new round of procurement for light utility/recon helicopters will involve HAL LUH competing against foreign designs made by local private players.
Passive Surveillance System
The IAF on December 2, 2014 released a RFI for development of a Passive Surveillance System (PSS) – a ground based system to be deployed in field areas for generation of 3D Air Situation Picture (ASP), by detecting and processing chance RF spectrum emissions and EM reflections of other transmissions in the vicinity of airborne platforms.Here are the deets excerpted from the RFI.
Overview
The PSS will intercept, process, analyze and generate all types of Radar transmissions across the complete band of Radar Operation Radio Frequency bands (30 MHz to 18 GHz).It will provide location and dynamic tracking of airborne, surface (ground and marine), mobile and fixed targets. The system would be capable of detection, location, identification and tracking of active and passive targets within its area of coverage. The system will comprise of a cluster of sensor stations all reporting their detections simultaneously to the Master Receiving and Processing Centre which will process the information for detection of targets and formation of tracks. The system should be highly mobile, vehicle mounted with very less deployment time.
ComponentsThe PSS system will comprise the following two systems
Passive Coherent Location Based Surveillance System to detect presence of targets using reflected RF emissions available in the environment.
Elint Based Surveillance System to detect, track, locate, correlate and identify intercepted RF emissions of the airborne platform in the area of deployment and process this information for generation of 3D Air situation picture.Air situation picture generated in both the systems would be integrated to form a comprehensive air situation picture. The output is to be in user defined format for integration in command and control system of IAF.
Passive Coherent Location Based Surveillance System
The system would consist of a network of receivers and a master station and will generate its own 3D air situation picture without any active transmission of its own.System capabilities required include:-
Detection of 2 sq-m RCS target at more than 300 Km of range.
Detection of targets from low level to very high altitude.
Estimating target coordinates in space namely range, azimuth, height and Doppler.
360-deg azimuth coverage.
Radar Finger Printing (RFPS) through correlation and identification of emitter with data library.
Remote operations including switching ON/OFF and operations of BITE, from an ops shelter located upto a distance of min 5 kms from system through OFC /radio link/ Satcom.Deployment Considerations.
The system should be vehicle mounted and capable of deployed in all types of terrain including mountainous region.
Deployment of the system should be quick and mechanized requiring minimum manual intervention.
The system should be self sufficient to meet camouflaging requirements(internal camouflage).Elint Based Surveillance System
Elint based passive system should comprise of multiple sensor stations and a control station. The system is to be capable of generating a real time 3D air situation picture based on intercepted data of airborne emitters. The system should have very high DF accuracy in terms of degree RMS for various frequency ranges.Required system capabilities include
Large surveillance area coverage around its deployment
Capability to intercept signals from all types of radars (pulse, pulse Doppler, CW), TACAN/DME interrogator, SIF/IFF interrogator and transponder, jammers, Data link and any other electromagnetic pulse and CW emitters on airborne platform.
Very wide instantaneous Band Width (BW)
High Probability of Intercept (POI)
360-deg instantaneous Azimuth coverage
http://thumkar.blogspot.in/2014/12/beating-stealth-threat-iafs-quest-for.html
IAF gearing up to tackle low observable threats.
Simplistic , you must also know the actual number of flight hour and the availability rate of each type
Mirages fly ~200 hours annually, Su-30 even more. One report from earlier this year claimed that Mirage-2000 and MiG-29 availability rates were around 75% while that of Su-30 were 50%. The former two already had overhaul facilities in India while the local overhaul facility of Su-30 has just gone online this year.
Of course, BAe never was penalised for these issues
Correction, liquidated damages were slapped on BAE.
http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=67770
Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Defence
29-November-2010 17:22 IST
Advanced Jet Trainer
The Hawk MK-132 Advanced Jet Trainer (AJT) was inducted into the IAF in 2008 as a fighter trainer with the aim to replace the Kiran MK-II/MiG-21 route of training. Keeping in view the delay in delivery of Hawk by HAL due to receipt of defective components, jigs and fixtures from the foreign manufacturer on whom liquidated damages were levied, the original training plan by Hawk for 2010-2011 has been modified and pilots of the Indian Air Force (IAF) are being trained on the MiG-21 aircraft. Induction of aircraft for training in the Indian Air Force is a continuous process.This information was given by Defence Minister Shri AK Antony in a written reply to Shri KJSP Reddy in Lok Sabha today.
MOHANTY/MMB
Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Defence
05-August-2013 18:47 IST
Mirage Aircraft
4.67% of the annual revenue expenditure is budgeted for spares and maintenance for the Mirage aircraft to maintain their required serviceability.
The prices of spares of Mirage-2000 aircraft are derived from Last Purchase Price / Price Catalogue escalated to current financial year. These prices are negotiated with the vendor every time through Contract Negotiation Committee meetings as per Defence Procurement Manual
The details of expenses during 2012-13 for the upkeep of the Mirage aircraft are as under:
Item
width: 500 [tr] [td]Expenditure[/td] [td](Rs. in Crores)[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Procurement of spares[/td] [td]228.00 = $44.7 mil[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Repair of aggregates[/td] [td]191.00 = $37.45 mil[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Capital procurement[/td] [td]61.16 = $11.99 mil[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Capital Repair[/td] [td]6.69 = $1.31 mil[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Total[/td] [td]486.85 = $95.46 mil[/td] [/tr] Additional Agreement No.8 (AA 8), regarding new price escalation formula for supply of Mirage spares from Original EquipmentManufacturer (OEM) is under finalisation.
This information was given by Defence Minister Shri AK Antony in a written reply to Shri Kalikesh N. Singh Deo in Lok Sabha today.http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=97687
Average dollar to rupee rate 2012: $1= Rs51
The number of mirage in inventory to calculate operating costs = 49
Estimated flying hours ~ 200+
-> R&M budget of Mirage-2000 per plane per year ~ $1.94 million
Ministry of Defence
09-December, 2014 13:16 IST
Crash Of Sukhoi Aircraft
Su-30 aircraft of the Indian Air Force had recently met with an accident near Sheyur village located near Pune. A Court of Inquiry has been ordered to ascertain the cause of accident and loss to service property. The maintenance work on SU-30 aircraft is carried out in accordance with procedures specified in the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Maintenance Manuals and Servicing Schedules for the aircraft.
The details of amount spent on the repair and maintenance task of the Sukhoi aircraft during the last three years is as under:
Year Repairs and maintenance cost
2011-12 Rs. 551.35 crore
2012-13 Rs. 877.84 crore
2013-14 Rs. 834.76 crore
This information was given by Defence Minister Shri Manohar Parrikar in a written reply to Shri Ishwarlal Shankarlal Jain in Rajya Sabha today.
HH/RAJ
(Release ID :112870)
http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=112870
Comparing the maintenance expenditure on Su-30Mki and Mirage-2000, a much larger Su-30 seems fairly economical to maintain (given that they are four times as many of them as M2K).
Are You sure ??? … they look more like the typical Sorbtsiya pod ??
The reporter, Ananth Krishnan is fairly reliable. Moreover, from AWST
The SAP 14 has already been exported, according to a Knirti brochure. The brochure shows the pod fitted to what it describes as an Su-30MKI (pictured below). The aircraft, side number 02, is believed to have been involved in the Su-30MKI development for India, suggesting that the SAP 14 may have at least been on offer.
Thank you Twinblade. Are the red sensors MAWSs or RWRs?
It’s still unclear which sensor will go where, but the final suite will receive laser warning receivers and dual tone IR MAWS in addition to existing RWRs. It may also receive AESA based on board jammers like on MiG-29Upg (derived from EW suite for Tejas) and SAP-518 pods for special missions.


This pic was Su-30MKI ground testing with Brahmos-A missile that was hang under hard-point No. 13 (New one, installed in between of hard-points No. 1 and No. 2 under belly).
That’s the first time SAP-518 pods have been seen in Indian service.
Understood that Dassault knew that the RFP specified HAL as the business that was to undertake assembly. In fact, had the GOI accepted Dassault’s proposal to use Reliance (or Tata and L&T and Mahindra & Mahindra etc ), India would have gained an alternative to HAL for aircraft assembly. Importantly, a private entity alternative – which I imagine would be far more effective than a state owned company such as HAL in fulfilling future assembly contracts.
No one has any issues with a private competitor to HAL. Reliance is a dirty dirty company and I am fairly understating it. Forget airospace and defence sector, they don’t make anything. Had it been L&T or a Tata group company, or even Mahindra, you wouldn’t find anyone complaining.
Does any one have news about the progress to modernize Su-30MKI with AESA radar or Super Sukhoi Su-30MKI?
Su-30Mki has been seen undergoing testing with SAP-518 Pods.
The EW system too is undergoing tests independently.
No news about AESA on SU-30Mki. I have a strong suspicion that we might see AESA on Tejas enter prototype testing before Su-30Mki.

According to journalist Ananth Krishnan M, HAL has started doing ground run on LUH prototypes since Decenmber 6th. For HAL, sh*t just got real. Instead of manufacturing Ka-226/Fennec and their own LUH as per the earlier plan, now they have to develop LUH in a record time or lose to the Ka-226/Fennec made by private players. On the plus side, if they win the size of the order is massive, and HAL’s rotorcraft division is one of their more competent divisions.
HAL’s poster child for speedy development turned their worst performing program and PR nightmare, Intermediate Jet Trainer HJT-36 Sitara, heading out for asymmetric load separation and sea trials.
Also, the supercruise requirements of AMCA are being finalised.
Anyone else think there should be more of a hunchback on PAKFA? It would suit conversion of a two seat version better, too.
Yes. Not as much as Su-30 (which goes well with the drooping nose)
Le Journal de l’Aviation
:: Actualités aéronautique :: Le futur Rafale indien exportable ?
Dimanche 07 décembre 2014Article publié le 04/12/2014 à 17h58 | Romain Guillot | 132 mots
Alors que le contrat des futurs Rafale destinés à l’Inde est toujours en cours de négociation, le ministre français de la Défense a indiqué à la presse indienne le 2 décembre qu’ Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) pourrait à son tour exporter l’appareil qui sera produit sous licence.
Selon Jean-Yves Le Drian, « HAL possèdera la technologie complète et la licence pour fabriquer des appareils supplémentaires qui, en outre, pourraient être exportés ».
Copyright ©2014 Le Journal de l’Aviation – Un site du Groupe AEROCONTACT
– See more at: http://www.journal-aviation.com/actualites/28361-le-futur-rafale-indien-exportable#sthash.hsjaX1jy.dpuf
Translation:
The Journal of Aviation
:: News :: The future aviation exportable Indian Rafale?
Sunday, December 7, 2014Article published on 12/04/2014 at 17:58 | Romain Guillot | 132 words
While the contract for future Rafale India is still being negotiated, the French defense minister told the Indian press on December 2 that Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) could in turn export the device which will be produced under license.
According to Jean-Yves Le Drian, “HAL possess the complete technology and license to manufacture additional devices which, moreover, could be exported.”