dark light

Twinblade

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,627 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2161781
    Twinblade
    Participant

    26 Il-76/Il-78/A-50I aircraft to be upgraded with new engines and life extensions by 20 years. Proposal cleared by DAC.
    Some upgrade of Pechora as well to allow usage for another decade.
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Ministry-of-defence-clears-military-projects-worth-over-Rs-12000-crore/articleshow/49584988.cms
    17 IL-76
    6 Il-78
    3 A-50I

    in reply to: Indian Navy news thread #2018948
    Twinblade
    Participant
    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2163907
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Cross posting from Tejas thread.
    http://ajaishukla.blogspot.in/2015/10/cutting-edge-israeli-radar-wins-air.html

    Localised El-2052 confirmed for Tejas and Jaguar. Massive win for the Israelis.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2167148
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Reliance would likely build Ka-226

    Russian, Indian Firms To Co-Produce Ka-226 Helos

    Not sure if one will put it in good news or bad news category πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2167162
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Two out of seven crashed because of mechanical failures in that time is a very high accident rate indeed. It indicates a very serious problem.

    Ecuador earlier complained that the Indian company had failed to ship some parts for the helicopters

    Dhruv Mk-1 had issues, unfortunately the civil aviation version is based on Mk-1. Mk-3 and Mk-4 have seen massive improvements. There’s a move to get out a new civil avitation variant based on Mk-3.

    The only saving grace for HAL in this fiasco is that Dhruv enjoys a much better safety record here under much adverse conditions (dusty, hot and high, matchstick sized landing grounds) so they can adopt time and tested defence of blame it on the customer. Also the users at home and the comptroller have stopped whinging about it, which can only mean good.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2167164
    Twinblade
    Participant

    In non-‘HAL is a total clutz’ news:
    http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/HAL-made-Attack-Helicopter-Completes-Performance-Trials/2015/10/16/article3083313.ece
    LCH finishes its performance trials before operational clearance which is expected soon. Weapons trials and production will commence on operational clearance.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2167165
    Twinblade
    Participant

    I can’t imagine why three distinct types of light helicopter would be called for. A foreign model to cover delays and problems with the indigenous model, sure. But two foreign models?

    Massive market.
    Army.
    Airforce.
    Navy.
    Coast Guard.
    BSF.
    ITBP.
    SSB.
    CRPF.
    NDRF.
    Central Government.
    29 State Governments.

    Too much moolah to be made. Indigenous stuff don’t finance post retirement jobs and stays in cushy hotels with quality escorts. Plus what is expected is that, soon, all procurement will have points for local manufacturing. If you don’t make it here, you won’t sell it here.

    in reply to: Indian Navy news thread #2019364
    Twinblade
    Participant
    in reply to: Indian Navy news thread #2019365
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Nirbhay test confirmed for Arihant, what’s not clear is whether it will be launched from torpedo tube or VLS.
    http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/Nuclear-Submarine-Arihant-Set-for-Missile-Firing-Test/2015/10/12/article3075656.ece

    Next missile test would be of Sagarika/K-15/B-05.

    in reply to: Indian Navy news thread #2019423
    Twinblade
    Participant

    http://www.janes.com/article/53532/iai-en-route-to-extended-range-barak-8er

    Well it’s the regular Barak-8/LRSAM that is being talked about. The target range at the beginning of the program was 70 km.

    in reply to: Indian Navy news thread #2019520
    Twinblade
    Participant

    http://www.deccanherald.com/content/505801/indigenous-nuclear-submarine-undergo-missile.html

    Nirbhay and one other type of missile (most likely K4) might be test fired from Arihant this month. I am actually surprised that Nirbhay is ready for submarine integration so early into testing.

    in reply to: Indian Navy news thread #2019522
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Barak-8 going 100+ km ? You’d usually have missiles falling 40% under the advertised range, not 40% over it πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2169954
    Twinblade
    Participant

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-planning-acquisition-of-advanced-Russian-air-defence-missile-system/articleshow/49306976.cms

    – Government may initiate procurement of S-400.
    – Deliveries of SpyDer SAM stuck because the mounting truck needed to be changed after blacklisting of the supplier.
    – Barak-8/MRSAM (IAF ground based version) deliveries to start 2016-17.

    The last one sounds optimistic because afaik, the testing of ground based Barak-8 has not started yet.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2169972
    Twinblade
    Participant

    From test pilot of LCH and Dhruv.

    β€˜The LCH fills in an important gap for intercepting and engaging UAV’

    Wg Cdr (retd) Unni Pillai, Chief Test Pilot (Rotary Wing) HAL

    What is the update on LCH developments?
    When it comes to the Light Combat Helicopter (LCH), we have certainly been able to translate all the learnings that we had previously in testing the Dhruv. In fact, you can say the LCH is a quantum jump over the Dhruv in every way. The LCH is extremely manoeuvrable at the same time it is rock steady, yes these are conflicting but the LCH does both these things very well. It is a very steady weapons platform, an attribute for its dedicated attack role and fills in an important gap for intercepting and engaging Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). Fighter aircraft are too fast for intercepting UAVs while the helicopters that we have are not fast enough, the LCH exactly fills this slot with its speed and mix of guns and missiles.

    We are very pleased with its performance and are as good as frozen on the design for the airframe at this point. We are waiting for certain armaments to arrive in October, following which firing trials will be held as the integration work for these weapons has already been completed. The LCH can carry a full load of weapons till 14,000 feet which is unmatched anywhere in the world. Essentially, the LCH can fly at heights of 4.5 km with a full weapons load. The weapons fit on the LCH today is as defined by the user, and at any time if the services require a new type of weapon, this integration and testing can be completed very quickly.

    The speed of LCH is 280 kmph and Dhruv is around 240 kmph. Because of its sleek design, you can maintain the speed and climb at faster rate. Dhruv takes 6.5 minutes to climb to 20,000 feet. In the summer at Leh, there is the Khardungla Pass which is at 20,000 feet. When you take off from Leh, all the helicopters whether they are Cheetah, Mi-8/Mi-17, they start orbiting over the town of Leh to gain height and once they have reached the necessary altitude only then do they cross the pass. In Dhruv and LCH, you just have to take-off and turn, the helicopter rockets upwards then you have to level out. Rudra has a top speed of 210 kmph, the LCH is able to achieve 280 kmph with all the external stores. In the final production version of the LCH, the glass cockpit will be from HAL and this has been developed in partnership with MCSRDC. As a result, it we will be able to integrate any new system onto the LCH, in a much faster manner. If the glass cockpit had been developed by a foreign vendor, then we would have needed to co-ordinate with that vendor for any weapons addition which would have been not only time consuming but also more expensive to make these changes.

    What is the status of Flight Testing of Dhruv?
    We are continuously testing the Dhruv and keep improving the platform. If you look at the variants from Mk1 to Mk IV there have been constant improvements in the basic helicopter. For eg. from Mk II to Mk III there was a huge jump, with regards to vibration reduction and a whole lot of things. Today, serviceability of the Dhruv Mk III is substantially improved over earlier versions and Mk IV is even better. We have improved aspects like the gearbox design and made a number of substantial changes. We will, of course, not stop improving the Dhruv and whenever we are made aware of issues, we look to resolve them as soon as possible. After the Dhruv entered service, we found pilots were reporting that the controls were very light on Mk I and Mk II. So, we actually made the controls heavier keeping safety in mind. We have also had to retrain pilots coming to Dhruv from older platforms to refrain from jumping on to the controls the moment they enter bad weather. In Dhruv they have to let the autopilot do its job and you should just monitor and this has been reinforced at HATSOFF.

    http://www.forceindia.net/Interview_UnniPillai.aspx

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2169974
    Twinblade
    Participant

    IAF to test a low RCS Glide Bomb, Waghnakh (Sanskrit: tiger claw), first of three inhouse concept weapons this month. The other two are antishipping cruise missile concept ‘Varunastra’ (Sanskrit: Varun’s weapon; not to be confused with torpedo of the same name) and land attack cruise missile Vel (Sanskrit: motion).

    Pictures here:
    http://www.livefistdefence.com/2015/10/iaf-to-flight-test-in-house-stand-off.html

    Waghnakh: 100+km; weight unknown. Already in flight trials on Su-30Mki.
    Varunastra: 270 KM; 225 Kg with 108 Kg warhed; Cruising speed 850Km/hr; 200Lbs/90Kg thrust.
    Vel: 270 Km; 208 Kg; 90 Kg thrust.

    The Varunastra and Vel seem to be variants of each other. All three are concept weapons and likely to be further developed with DRDO.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,627 total)