dark light

Twinblade

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,627 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cockpit visibility and Sukhoi factories #2379795
    Twinblade
    Participant

    @hotdog, the rear view from this little birdie isn’t exactly awesome is it ?

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_YGLQQZTHoU0/SPSJyb_J2gI/AAAAAAAAEsQ/btTX4EXN3wg/s400/f35_3.jpg

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2380251
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Military aircraft engine must be quickly developed: IAF chief N A K Browne

    “This (military aircraft engine) is an area where we need to focus… you may have to steal, beg or borrow but you have to do it. This is one of the core technologies required by the nation,” Air Chief Marshal Browne emphasised.

    ACM Browne is almost desperate now, didn’t ACM Naik scoffed at the GTRE-Snecma co-op ?

    another interesting quote from the article which i think might be related to F-INSAS program for infantry…

    Browne said another key technology required by the IAF was the latest and most advanced Active Electronically Scanned Array ( AESA) radar.

    He said the latest radar should be developed indigenously as it gives a wider coverage range to the aircraft and can be used for intelligence gathering and provide information to local commanders at a faster pace.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2380848
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Anti-foreign object.

    FOD Screen ?

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2381276
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Yo You think CHINA CANT MAKE MISSILES!!!!!! And what do you think pL-12 is doing? HAHHAHA!! MASsIVE FAIL!!!!!!!

    in Dreaming-Land!!

    Yo like HUGE export sucess of R-33 and 37 😀

    I couldn’t understand what you were trying to convey :confused:

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2381280
    Twinblade
    Participant

    I’m more concerned about the physical aspects of size and weight of the weapon than about the electronic side. It’s questionable that individual hardpoints are cleared for such heavy weapons and/or that they could fit size wise.

    If Gripen can carry Taurus and Meteor i don’t see why Tejas shouldn’t be able to.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2381619
    Twinblade
    Participant

    European firm offers missiles for IAF’s Su-30

    I think IRIS-T or ASRAAM has been confused for Mica. Are their datalinks even compatible with Russian fighters ?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2381964
    Twinblade
    Participant

    With Eng. subs…pretty informative report
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVJny6UL6V8

    When they say that the engine already satisfies airforce’s requirements…. except reduced radar visibility, is he talking about the frontal radar signature or the rear ?

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2382858
    Twinblade
    Participant

    some may consider that, for a multirole bird, internal carriage is quite overrated… 😉

    for a bomber, on the other hand, it can be considered interesting, but for the rest…

    Those some usually are from nations that are not seeking 5th gen platforms to protect their own 4.5 gens.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2383172
    Twinblade
    Participant

    The right canard deflected so much compared to left one, a stun scene. Haha, ask a striker to do it the same.

    http://img.fyjs.cn/Mon_1110/27_99726_a6719a32978c1f7.jpg

    What happened to the colour of nozzles ?

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2383251
    Twinblade
    Participant

    which article?

    the one where he said 400 F-18s are better than 200 Typhoons, but at the same time we suck for going foreign, go indigenous.. which defeats the point of 400 F-18s?

    Yes that one :p

    in reply to: Cockpit visibility and Sukhoi factories #2383442
    Twinblade
    Participant

    F 16, F 15. F 18 all have better visibility from cockpit than SU/Russian designs.

    Does microsoft flight sim offer a view from the cockpit as well ?

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2383455
    Twinblade
    Participant

    Please don’t kill me, but from this angle it really looks like the offspring of mig1.44 and berkut. 🙂

    *runs away*

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2383563
    Twinblade
    Participant

    its a design philosophy. Since MiG-21 days most if not all Russian combat aircraft do not emphasize rear view visibility. pilots vision should be straight ahead only

    Its a sliding canopy. Most sliding canopies are angled upward at the rear end.

    http://gb.fotolibra.com/images/previews/360234-harrier-gr9-cockpit-detail.jpeg

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2383600
    Twinblade
    Participant

    😉 I have long thought and commented that all these twin engined fighters would become White Elephants at one stage for the IAF. Good to know some one in the media thinks the same as well. 😉

    If you might have read Admiral Arun Prakash’s article on MMRCA shortlist, that article was way better than this one with regards to cost v/s capability.

    in reply to: Indian Missiles News #1796206
    Twinblade
    Participant

    I thought helina was cancelled because they had problems with the seeker head, or was that Nag?

    Neither is cancelled. Nag just had a successful user trial.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,627 total)