The T-X image looks like a single engined Hornet hybrid, which for a dual control Cockpit would be pretty much off the shelf. Mating it to an all new single engined rear half would be the costly part.
Its like mating F-16 to hornet ๐ This bird could still sell as a regular frontline fighter….
![]()
IIRC the X-32 had a rather complex system of inlet blockers in place. Also it had a belly duct like the F-16 and not Flanker-type straight rectangular ducts leading straight to the engine face.
Huh ? Inlets don’t come any straighter than x-32
There is potential for integrating a radar blocker directly with the square engines that the PAK-FA would eventually be fitted out with… who knows?
For all we know, the initial compressor face could itself be made out of radar absorbing composites and covered in RAM
New article (referring to a previous one) stating a rafale lead in the swiss competition
http://ing.dk/artikel/122131-fransk-kampfly-favorit-i-schweiz
The article also quotes that EF leads in Indian competition. Choosing your favourite parts eh.. ๐
Fighting for great Indian aircraft order , both the Rafale and Eurofighter competing for the largest international order just now. It is for India to have 126 combat aircraft with an option for more. The European suppliers are chosen after the first flight tests and evaluations, and according to rumors among international fagjournalister it here Eurofighter, standing with a favorite role. Switzerland is expected to buy in neighborhood of 30 combat aircraft.
The seeker view, or lack of it should be irrelevant , cant the data from the sensors on the aircraft be fed to the missile so it only requires lock well after it is launched
X2. Wasn’t this touted as one of the advantages of 360 degree electro optic sensors ?
Though even worse for me is having it confirmed that no, there are no side bays on the PAK-FA for short-range AAMs. Even for those precious spaces from the main bays will have to be sacrificed.:(

Wake up Witcha ๐
Hmmm maybe I am. But, there just seems a lot of news coming out all of a sudden when theres a huge deal due to be announced any time now – coincidence maybe. When was the last time we heard any news concerning upgrades for the Typhoon was released? Four, five or even six months ago maybe? (Sooner?)…
Ah well. Its getting some quite serious upgrades anyway.
Not to forget there is Swiss, Malaysian, South Korean and Japanese tenders to think of, where, especially in Korean and Japanese tenders, the competitors might struggle with initial delivery dates.
Next generation encryption technology developed by Cassidian is fitted into the Eurofighter. Encryption is a critical cyber security technique to ensure mission data is securely exchanged between friendly forces.
Eurofighter Typhoon will be the first aircraft in the world to be equipped with next generation encryption technology developed by Cassidian with support from Raytheon Systems Ltd. The full electronic key management system will be delivered shortly for integration into the platform and will be a major step forward for the management of multi-crypto platforms, potentially reducing the key loading process from one hour to less than one minute on a daily basis.
http://www.defpro.com/news/details/27690/?SID=44df5b2c294a64ed015f295d57c90c88
I am not sure as to how this technology might be put to use, particularly this part
Eurofighter Typhoon will be the first aircraft in the world to be equipped with next generation encryption technology developed by Cassidian with support from Raytheon Systems Ltd. The full electronic key management system will be delivered shortly for integration into the platform and will be a major step forward for the management of multi-crypto platforms, potentially reducing the key loading process from one hour to less than one minute on a daily basis.
I thought Link-16 had its own encryption standards, besides would this new encryption be compatible with export customers network ?
Hasnยดt there been talk of inducting more MMRCA, and also quicker, possibly outside of HAL production, as well as for nuclear strike role?
My prediction takes the upper end of the MMRCA numbers mentioned at around 200. The strategic force of additional 40 frames (of some type) is not taken into account unless some more concrete news comes out on that front. At which point a revised prediction will be made ๐
I think the last order of 42 Mki’s (40 for strategic role + 2 for crashed) was meant for that. I may be wrong on this one though.
After a few month’s hiatus, here’s an updated IAF force composition prediction. This takes into account the revised Mig-29 and M2K upgrade sched. Note that at 2030, the IAF will have about 7 fighter types. The irony is that in 2012 the IAF will operate about 7 types. So even after almost 20 years, the IAF’s menagerie of fighters will not come down. Even in the 2040s the IAF will operate about 5 manned fighter types.
Also, by 2030, about a quarter of the force will be 5th gen and the overwhelming majority (2/3rds) will be 4th gen (MKI, MMRCA & LCA). All this assumes a HAL production rate of about 35 frames (total) of various types per year.
good job as usual victor ๐
Regretably there is no bird-view available, if you can supply it.
the superimpose has been done with F-22’s up-view, the impressive thing is not how long the weapon bay the PAKFA owned, but it significantly wider (I mean much wider than I could possibly imaged:eek:) than F-22.
I spent the last 2 hours searching for ideal shots for comparison, I couldn’t find ideal center line tail shot or a perfect top shot :confused: ๐
Why even bother ? What is wrong with privatisation. Its the best way forward. Sell them all infact there should be no PSUs and only companies based on profit in that way our country will have higher growth rate and better companies.
Seems like your wish has been granted, NDTV tweets that Govt might divest (at least a significant part of ) HAL.
If the bay is big enough, you can fit ’em in. BTW, you’ve got some of that the wrong way round. JSOW wasn’t intended to fit inside JSF: it pre-dates the JSF design. Same with most other weapons intended for internal carriage.
The JSF weapons bay was sized around existing US weapons, not the other way round, though it’s since become a development criterion for new weapons.
If the PAK-FA bay is big enough for 1000kg guided bombs, it should be big enough for everything JSF can carry internally.
I think it may be too early to comment on that, JSF’s bay has clearly been developed around NATO weapons and that may have been primarily responsible for its weapons bay geometry 
That odd shape gives a lot of room for massive ordinance. Sure Pak-Fa might have huge bays as well (maybe larger in terms of volume), but the geometry might be completely different.
just 250 kg bombs. that’s official statement from KTRV. (KAB-250/UAB-250 (SDBski))
Kh38 which is supposedly going to fit inside Pak-Fa weapons bay itself weighs 1120 lbs, i suppose we may see larger bombs as well.
If India is getting some autonomy (ie Source Codes etc) the Indian version can have smaller western munitions ๐
Which western stand-off munitions do you expect to fit inside those internal bays ? JSOW ? JSM ? SDB ?
Is it possible to fit weapons intended for JSF inside Pak-Fa considering different weapons bay geometry and hence differences in clearances available for weapons, even if India is able to receive permits from different nations manufacturing those weapons ?
The only weapons that might end up inside Pak-Fa might be Russian, Indian or those which are jointly developed.
Note what else they don’t include in the price which is pretty stupid as most of those avionics items are an intergral part of the aircraft and not a bolt on option as they are with the older generation aircraft. You can’t have an F-35 without them so might as well be honest with the price and highlight what you get for the money as it will hurt them more when people have been quoting one price to their voters and than have to admit later the real price was much higher.
So its probably nearer to $85 million than $65 miilion, and that if the production run is uneffected by the US DoD budget cutbacks or technical issues which delay the aircraft getting into full production.
The article says $111 million in 2011 dollars. Probably will hit 125 in 2020 dollars when its time for customers to pay.
Actually the nozzle on PAKFA is exquisite much more than your flap TVC.
I know.. was just trying to put an idea across
Edit : Emile, can you superimpose the top view on bottom view and front view on rear view of Pak-Fa with highlighted edges to clarify the inlet geometry ? I think there are quite a few head-on and tail images captured in the same plane as the flat surface of internal bays that may help.