(Unless your referring to the nozzle itself, moving from a circular to a square nozzle can cost up to 9-10% in efficiency IIRC – that cannot be easily worked around as far as I am aware; maybe delaying the shape change from circular to rectangular to as late as possible would help, I’m not sure if the drop is due to extra internal pressure losses, or to reduced efficiency of the wake mixing phenomena – maybe both)
Some reports suggest that a LO nozzle with a good design might be able to keep it under 5%
http://ajaishukla.blogspot.com/2009/09/kaveri-jet-engine-finally-poised-for.html
65 Kilonewtons thrust achieved. That translates to about 6628 kilograms of thrust. Engine weight is acknowledged to be 1265 kilograms. Thrust to weight ratio = 5.24:1.
http://www.livemint.com/2008/08/19235347/In-aircraft-engine-development.html
Earlier article claiming 7000-7500kg of thrust. Using the higher thrust number still yields the highest known reliable claim of the Kaveri engine thrust to weight ratio, 5:93:1.
Both claims come from Mohan Rao who is the director of GTRE. The horses mouth as it were. There are other sources floating around from presentations at Aero-India that corroborate the same specs.
The only figures anyone has ever pulled out of any **** are the wikipedia claims that put the Kaveri on par with the F414. Nor are people writing about the Kaveri “trolls” simply because they highlighted the truth that certain others who rather shovel FUD over.
How dare you quote incremental stage by stage achievements of the program as the final thrust figures π no wonder the thrust to weight of Kaveri keeps changing for you π
THIS is what you call the horse’s mouth and This is what you call a detailed project analysis.
Fair comment but returning to what I said:
“It is my understanding that the intention is to use Kaveri / M-88eri, whatever you choose to call it as the powerplant for the AMCA.”
I did not say it was definitely going to happen, I said the intention was to use modified Kaveri engines in the AMCA.
I hope the modifications stay well short of 100%! Anywhere near that figure and without transfer of critical technology, India might just as well manufacture a suitable engine under licence it seems to me. Cuts out the risk of engine procurement holding up AMCA (with the possibility of further aircraft imports being deemed necessary?)
One more thing: if France declines to pay for a 90KN+ M-88 and AMCA needs an engine of that thrust, will India end up indirectly paying development costs for the Armee de l’Air?
If Kaveri ends up on AMCA (in 90 KN + avatar), it will be a totally redesigned engine and not a modification from the current one. The deal GTRE is now looking for is wrt co-development is not a modification or a consultancy per se but actually sharing the work. The current Kaveri was designed to be only slightly better than GE-404, but the customer requirements have reached a completely new level now and the design has reached its potential.
It is my understanding that the intention is to use Kaveri / M-88eri, whatever you choose to call it as the powerplant for the AMCA.
Sources (just the first 5 from a Yahoo search on Kaveri + AMCA):
http://www.india-defence.com/reports-4969
http://www.indiandefence.com/forums/f7/kaveri-power-amca-aircraft-3826/
http://www.indiandefence.com/amca-indian-kaveri-jet-engine-20110204/
They are just speculations, no deal has been done to integrate m-88 core on kaveri as of now. The french demand a minimum run for at least 300 engines if the deal is to go through. Moreover they themselves seem to be abandoning the idea of 90KN+ m-88 now, so the premium on french cooperation will definitely go up.

that pyramid shaped bump on the tail seems to be a ripe spot for electro optic sensors.
There are more troll-tales on Kaveri (both pro and anti) than truth on forums. Truth be told, it was overambitious, with no prior experience and under spent on and the design has hit a roadblock with the material technology India has.
Indian Sukhoi 30MKI to be upgraded into βSuper Sukhoiβ
The upgrade will include a new cockpit, an upgraded radar and certain stealth characteristics to make it less visible to enemy radar than the present Sukhoi 30. Most significantly, the aircraft will be able to carry a heavier weapons load including the airborne version of the Brahmos supersonic cruise missile, he added.
The Irkut chief did not provide any indication of the price of the upgrade project. However, going by the general cost trends of similar upgrades, the price could run close to a billion dollars. The Super Sukhoi would be a potent weapons platform offering both ground attack of precision targets and air superiority roles.
Just a billion dollar ?
Cheaper alternative to F-22 lol? More like twin engine alternative to F-35. F-22 is pretty irrelevant in this case.
If i were a LM executive in charge of KFX-3, i would already be having nightmares about the prospects of f-35’s success against Pak-Fa in the tender.
I think you guys have got your wires crossed. Article 101 KC is the DASS equivalent for the PAK-FA composed of 6 elements:
101 KC (?) is the sensor replacing the traditional OLS;
101 KC-O is the spherical mounting behind ’52’s canopy;
101 KC-Y are the (4) distributed sensors.That ‘Sniper’ pod’s designation is not (yet) known. It may explain the failure to induct license produced ‘Damocles’, I hope it’s as capable as the aforementioned western types.
This system is already undergoing testing on Su-35 right ?
last time we heard, boeing said J-20 is no match for SH π
Regarding the exhausts, I think since the program has started with a 3D TVC, IMO is very likely the production T-50 is MEANT to get a 3D TVC, because all the program, all the requirements and all the airframe was designed and tested with this kind of device, so the rounded 3D TVC is here to stay.
If indians want their exhausts ala Raptor…well, is their problem, go and pay for that garbage…
But I think russians are not that dumb.
give the IAF a 3D TVC LO nozzle and they will pay for superior garbage as well π
Yes well we are going to be using that to defend our country and so will the Russians be. So screw aestheticsI hope it gets F 22 style nozzles.
let it not be as ugly as this one 
Doesn’t bode well that they can’t even sign the jv contract,after all this time!
Well depends on what the french are bringing to the table (regardless of what they are capable of) and what price they expect. As one of the objectives of the JV, Indians were to develop the low pressure stage and french were to develop the high pressure stage of the new engine. Since it has been dragging on for the past few years, i believe neither side has reached an understanding for the work share and the extant of JV.
I haven’t really had any interest in the Kaveri programme ever since I realised that the chances of getting a viable indigenous engine from the GTRE within a reasonable timeframe were nil. But what exactly is the current status of the program?
Right now Kaveri is undergoing a series of tests, but it is not supposed to hit production before 2015 at least .
I gather the tests at the Gromov Institute were discontinued and the K9 program put on hold(presumably the results were unfavourable?). So is the Snecma-GTRE K10 engine(with M88-3 core) the only future of the programme?
The high altitude test failures was one setback but the program has crossed that hurdle long back.
I get a nagging feeling that by the time ADA/HAL is ready to begin work on the AMCA the IAF will have to settle for another foreign engine after all…
Haven’t read any updates on the Kaveri Marine Gas Turbine either, now that I think about it…
Kaveri marine was envisaged as one of the ways to recover the cost of the program as in its current stage the engine is not going to pay for itself any time shortly. The kaveri marine was put together from one of the several prototypes that were no longer being tested upon. They are also trying to pitch the engine to the railways to get it in production.