1,700-seater indigenous aircraft soon
TNN Jun 13, 2011, 11.40am
ISTPANAJI: Union minister of state for science, technology and earth sciences Ashwani Kumar said a 1,700-seater passenger aircraft will be rolled out in the next seven years.
Speaking in Panaji, Kumar said development of the aircraft is in an advanced stage and hoped India will be able to produce this state-of-the-art indigenous passenger aircraft soon.
“This will lead to the development of 34 to 40 new aircraft,” Kumar said. He said this would have a tremendous impact in connecting 2-tier and 3-tier cities. “There are many countries developing such aircraft but India and China are front runners,” he said. The aircraft is being designed and developed by the National Aerospace Laboratory, Bangalore.
Haha, possibly one or two extra zeroes :p in the number of seats
Talk about expensive. The MMRCA is all the media has been blabbering about for years, and this appears all of a sudden, with a much bigger monetary investment.
Wait till you hear about the coming submarine tender, supposed to supersede MMRCA as the single biggest deal 🙂
Aha! I think I said this could be a possibility…;)
India to buy more than 16 C-17 airliftersThat would make a total of 24 C 17s…looks like IAF took the spares issue seriously..
Expensive , but there cant be a better replacement for the Il 76..
——-
IAF must be really pissed off with Ilyushin and really happy with Boeing. Reports suggest that IAF was really pleased with C-17’s load carrying capacity at Leh in summer.
That would have a range shorter than an average north korean,
why not just build a railgun then.It takes something like this to make it both hypersonic and reusable
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3035332.stm
If they are actually working on making a missile reusable, it would be much simpler (ie fire the missile conventionally, deliver the payload, turn back and recover via parachute). Maybe good for 3-4 launches till the scramjet engines give up.
Eurofighter Nations Inch Closer to New Radar Commitment;
Development of an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar for the Eurofighter Typhoon is continuing, although the four European partner nations still have not collectively committed funds. However, at the Paris Air Show later this month they plan to sign a letter of intent (LoI) with Eurofighter that confirms their intention to eventually adopt and pay for the new technology.
Swashplate and GaN sounds all good, but when ? I know they are trying to make a quality product, but will it be ready till the time license production starts in India ?
Kalam for developing BrahMos’ hypersonic version
Former president of India and an eminent rocket scientist himself, Dr.A.P.J. Abdul Kalam has the following odd suggestion to Brahmos corporation
“You should develop a hypersonic version of BrahMos which can be reused… meaning that the missile should be able to deliver its payload and return to base. This will help in maintaining our leadership in this arena,” he said at a function to mark the 10th anniversary of the launch of BrahMos missile.
Reusable drone like Brahmos ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-awWSx48KgM&feature=player_embedded
Found this youtube video of T-50 flying around. Notice the car alarms going off when it flies by :p, also it appears to get into a really slow speed just before landing.
another demo flight for another Indian delegation on today’s morning
photo (c) Sergey Lysenko
original http://russianplanes.net/ID46068
This pic is so good that it looks photoshopped :p
(Possibly LAG. Maybe someone posted this already?)
From JAST To J-20
Posted by Bill Sweetman at 1/14/2011 5:42 AM CST
Sometimes the analysis of a new design is one of those areas where you get a whack-on-the-side-of-the-head moment.
This one was induced by the discussion here of the origins of the F-35 design, wherein I suddenly realized what the J-20 reminded me of – Lockheed’s immediate pre-JAST/JSF design, tested in the form of a large powered mock-up.
:diablo: That design has nothing to do with j-20. To those who blabber about industrial espionage and data theft etc trying to discredit chinese effort:
Sure, Chinese did some of that. but the point is even if they did all of those that would not garantee a successful product.
as far as I can tell, J-20 has new structure, flight controls, and new avionics package. To design a new flight control, they had to have good aero- and structure data. They had to stick this thing in Wind tunnels and in CFDs and rework it from pretty much ground up.
In another word, sure you can steal blue prints or you can steal some bits of data, but you can’t get the entire data package that makes up the analysis that goes into the airplane.
To wave off chinese progress on industrial espionage and stealing blue prints really betrays some of commentator’s utter lack of experience in aeronautic industry. :diablo:
What’s gotten into you hottie, new threads for everyone :p
BrahMos Aerospace To Add Hypersonic Missile To Lineup
“We Expect to be able to Start the Tests of BrahMos Missiles Launched from Aircraft. Various Types of Aircraft, including Su-30 MKI fighters, are expected to be armed with these missiles,” says BrahMos Aerospace Director Alexander Maksichev.
India also is Planning to Deploy the Air-Launched Version on the Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft being Developed with Russia.
Says nothing about miniaturization for internal bays though 🙁
Count yourself lucky we did not end up with the F-32 ‘Monica’.
monica would have looked good if it had a more conventional f-16 like intake 🙂
Really? What has changed since the allowance of civil aviation and internal security sectors for defense offsets:
Ajai Shukla link that came up first on Google
Oops, this little piece escaped my attention, I stand corrected 🙂 I wonder what prevented Boeing to get away with civil aerospace in C-17 deal :rolleyes:
Given the angle of the picture we probably can’t tell, unless we can see the rest of the plane to understand the angular transformation. However, if it is shorter, maybe the engines of the J-20 are just longer?
The reason i believe J-20 is so “thick” is maybe because the Chinese don’t expect their engines to catch up with F-22 engine thrust levels in terms of thrust to weight ratio of engines, hence maybe they are trying to compensate by huge engines and massive internal fuel capacity.
Its somewhat ugly for US fighters.
Doesn’t come close to an Eagle or non-CFT old school single-seater Falcon.
You can’t really fit in internal bays, higher thrust engines to counter increased drag, and higher internal fuel for thirstier engines without making a medium sized fighter fat. It still didn’t manage to look like a flying bathtub that J-20 does from certain angles.