Does the words “X86”, “Intel” or “AMD” tells you something ?

C’mon, get another coffee :very_drunk:

ooooh – now that is risky grounds for comparison.

x86 survives due to inertia within the environment. NOT because it is the fastest or most efficient solution.

The odds are the F-35/F-22 will still have a comfortable level of Superiority over either the Russian PAK-FA or Chinese J-20.

Only in your mind.

The F-22 is now ~20 years old. Still top dog (of in-service stuff), but its a bit much to expect time not to have closed the gap.

The F-35 has some cool electronics so it’ll have full situational awareness of what kills it.

How will it be in English?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]224632[/ATTACH]

Hardpoints I suppose..

or pylons if you mean only wing-mounted…

But anyways, there is a little bit more to radar returns than 4 fudge factors. That approach is little more than a guess to be honest.

Average value taken for the calculation. In the same scale RCS min F-22 – 0.3 m2, RCS min T-50 – 0.5 m2

http://paralay.com/paralay_tab.xls

Line 91 and 92

Are you actually trying to be serious?

RCSmin = [FrontalArea/2]*[nLiftSurfaces/6]*coatingFactor*formFactor*plasmaFactor

RCSmax = “point of suspension” + RCSmin + 0.5*0

No idea what “point of suspension” is and dunno why the last 0 changes only for the T-4 or Tu-22….

Remember the laser doesn’t have to be on another plane it can be ground based. The result is the same a dead aircraft. Ground abased systems wont have same trouble with power systems as airborne ones will.

There was concepts of ground based lasers using dirigible mounted mirrors to both target and to chain-gang multiple lasers onto targets.

Laser are very real things while force fields are still just science fiction even it we would all like to have them both.

I meant more direct laser vs. laser combat

It is a subject that interests me – having no intention of learning a new interface and being unwilling to purchased ‘product-activated’ software, I am planning to run my XP-based system for years to come.

Windows 7 + dexpot + qttabbar + excel new instance

No engineer should be without at least the latter 3. [Or a nix box I suppose] I now find having to work on other people’s computers massively frustrating and significantly slower.

And don’t get me started on monitor sizes. Every engineer should be given at least 2 27″ screens. Its a false economy otherwise.

As regards the photos – it’ll be XP 64bit. 32 bit is no use for big models and XP is still kicking around in many, many design houses. Of course, the photos themselves are absolutely canned. Probably of things that are already out of date.