dark light

Owlcat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 254 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How could Rafale lose the UAE deal to Typhoon #2290504
    Owlcat
    Participant

    Bribery can defeat any reasoning :diablo:.

    in reply to: F-22A Raptors to South Korea. #2291033
    Owlcat
    Participant

    It appears NK is like a child who longs for attention and once they’ve got it become fixated on something else.

    The same can be said about the other two and the media coverage that is going to shift to the next non news once people get tired of the “OMG! mad evil commie fatso is threatening the Free World® with WWIII”.

    I think its extremely prudent for the US to show resolve when faced with these kinds of threats for to do nothing would demonstrate to this isolated regime that their rhetoric has “scared” their enemies.

    Hollow threats are that, nothing more nothing less. Trying to look tough against someone that is not a threat unless it feels threatened is irresponsible.

    Notice that US actions were not accompanied by any sabre rattling comments we might have seen from previous administrations.

    And notice how this administration doesn’t look for Congress approval before engaging in another mess.

    in reply to: F-22A Raptors to South Korea. #2291331
    Owlcat
    Participant

    South Koreans also love stirring the pot and their share of nut jobs calling to start a preventive war and dream with nuclear weapons.

    in reply to: Chinese CSS-7 – variant of HQ-2 SAM #1790432
    Owlcat
    Participant

    Looks like a gigantic mortar round.

    in reply to: Which attack helicopter for Iraq? #2292596
    Owlcat
    Participant

    The US is not “sunni” AFAIK!

    But gulf sugar daddies are and their lavish lifestyle must be protected :rolleyes:.

    in reply to: Which attack helicopter for Iraq? #2292713
    Owlcat
    Participant

    Muslims are not afraid to die because they believe in afterlife. Americans cannot ever scare Muslims.

    Complete nonsense.

    in reply to: Which attack helicopter for Iraq? #2292730
    Owlcat
    Participant

    Iraq will certainly be “shifting” away from the US… but not by THAT much… not many people have a first hand experience of being on the “wrong side” of the USA as much as the Iraqis! They’ll try to make a balance by giving just enough political/economic “nuggets” to all the “power blocks” in the area…

    With their Shia population they are going to be on “the wrong side” as long as Sunni hatred against them continue gaining support at home and abroad.

    in reply to: Malaysian fighter competition #2296210
    Owlcat
    Participant

    the other can be solved with words.
    potential issues between Malaysia and US supply of spares were all Mahathir’s own doing because he was so anti-Israel and part time anti-US. none of the other Malaysian leaders afterwards share the same views, thus your spare issues from the US is weakened.

    secondly if Malaysia had the money to solve Migs spare issues, they would’ve done it by now but the problem is deeper than money. Its a moot point. Malaysia didn’t invite MiG to the next round so don’t bother arguing about fantasy MiG-29 variants in the RMAF.

    I don’t fantasize about nothing, you’re the one talking about MiG spares like the state of those aging MiGs was relevant to the thread when it’s know for years that they are going to be retired sooner than later.

    US spare issue is not my issue is the issue of US hardware users and time has proven that depending on the political climate in Washington lesser friends have ended up with supply problems and unless Malaysia doesn’t become US new very best friend in the region the risk of political strife continue to exist not matter who is office.

    in reply to: Malaysian fighter competition #2296406
    Owlcat
    Participant

    take your pick, lack of spares because the US blocked sales of it or lack of spares because MiG is unable to deliver it

    One an be solved with money the other not. With recent deliveries of MiG-29Ks to India, Russian Navy contract and the production line running at least new airframes shouldn’t suffer from spare shortage.

    in reply to: Malaysian fighter competition #2296487
    Owlcat
    Participant

    the RMAF prefers their Hornets over the MiG-29
    but Mahathir prefer the MiG-29 over the Hornet because of politics.

    People tend to like newer hardware.

    thowever that’s no longer true these days. Mahathir is gone and Malaysia is more closer to the west now.

    A happy honeymoon can end in a sour divorce the same day of the wedding, a good relation now doesn’t guarantee avoiding sanctions in the future if someone in Washington feels the need to score some points throw Kuala Lumpur under the bus in favor of someone else.

    in reply to: Malaysian fighter competition #2296550
    Owlcat
    Participant

    Well, the Malaysian government picked Su-30MKM over the Super Hornet with an AESA radar, so I don’t think they care about the capabilities too much; it is all about the cost because Malaysia is not Singapore.

    It’s not like you can’t fit a Su-30MKM with an AESA radar or that Su-30MKM is known for its limited technical specs.

    For a non aligned country like Malaysia buying US hardware depends mainly on the end user agreement, specially when US politicians can jeopardize those systems at will through sanctions.

    in reply to: F117 in South Korea? #2296779
    Owlcat
    Participant

    The F-117’s were retired a few years ago. They remain in flyable storage in their old desert home, at Tonopah.

    Weren’t most of them destroyed?
    http://aviationintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/stealthscrap1011.jpg
    The remaining units in storage are hardly airworthy and the few(?) flyable samples presumably are used to test other systems.

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2296929
    Owlcat
    Participant

    .. and that way the Russians lost many time to their surprise. See some comparisons about that: MiG-29 versus F-16, MiG-23 versus F-4F, MiG-21 versus Mirage IIIC, MiG-17 versus Mytere IVA, MiG-15 versus F-86, I-200/MiG-1 versus BF-109E about that. Nothing more is misleading in arial warfare before the opponent is outclassed really. To be outperformed in some areas by raw data means nothing at first. Personal I have no problem to accept that the Su-35 has better raw data in most areas. In Mathematics and Statistics the Lancaster Rule shows to win over two [Rafale] with a high propability to win a single one [Su-35] has to be four-times as good at least. Russian military planner had just that in mind, when the learned the hard way that not all that nasty details had the same value in a specific situation not predicted that way before. What works in military exercises and staged maneuver does not so on a real battle field against an opponent not sticking to the rules.

    It’s the same old tale again and again the one in disadvantage can’t win, period.

    Those MiGs more often than not were mere practice shooting for reasons that can’t hardly be explained from a technical point of view.

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2299248
    Owlcat
    Participant

    Cruise missiles don’t shoot down fighter jets.

    SAM lobbing can do the trick if those fighters are not destroyed beforehand but in the end is the same concept.

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2299502
    Owlcat
    Participant

    Cruise missiles are the modern age human wave.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 254 total)