dark light

DCK

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,043 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anson Mk.I close to flight #1001396
    DCK
    Participant

    Wow, no silly negative comments yet! Must be some kind of record.

    in reply to: Flying Legends 2012 , the participants … #1002544
    DCK
    Participant

    [QUOTE=’568 crew;1899180]Doesn’t excite me as much as the older lists did.
    It appears the participants list is getting smaller, with fewer surprises.[/QUOTE]

    Yeah, P-47 debut and P-38…what’s the excitement about that………

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1003055
    DCK
    Participant

    P-38 and S-38 confirmed!

    James

    Link?

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1010850
    DCK
    Participant

    I am not knocking the aircraft, a fine new build it is, I just cringe when you see them at airshows and the commentator goes into this aircraft fought in France blah blah blah….horse crock… I have been to France on 5 occasions in my lifetime, and have probably got more time in France than the thing taxing past in front of me ever has…

    So it’s a matter of commentary at airshows, not the plane.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1011892
    DCK
    Participant

    When you restore a Spitfire (or any aircraft) isn’t this just a continuation of it’s history? As long as it’s restored as close to original spec, and with an original powerplant (or close as if none available) I don’t see a problem.

    There’s probably very few `original` parts in an original Spitfire anyway in the same way there are very few `original` parts in my Ford Mondeo as when it left the factory.

    So what’s the beef?

    There is none if you ask me. Just grumpy old men 😀

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1012012
    DCK
    Participant

    I disagree, that is not P9374, it is simply a newbuild with an old data plate nailed to it, there will be next to nothing left in it from the original, you wouldn’t pass off a Chippendale desk that was manufactured in 2010 but sporting a makers label as an original, and neither is this. It is not a replica, but neither is it an old warbird and neither is it a restoration as the original material in it will be negligible, it is plain and simply a new build, and as such the plate could also be manufactured for all the difference it makes towards this being a genuine warbird..

    Even if you’re right, then so what? What does it matter?

    All I know, is that I now have the opportunity to witness a truly beautiful aircraft take flight. One that represents the closest to Mitchell’s original design and vision that I am likely to ever see and hear.

    Regardless of “Restoration” or “Reconstruction” or the methods of it’s extraction from the French coast, we now have a glorious example of the Spitfire in it’s purest form to appreciate and enjoy.

    I am grateful to everyone that has contributed to the re-birth of P9374. I can’t wait to see her fly.

    And that’s about it.

    We are quickly reaching a 100 years since the BoB (yes, I know, still several decades). What are we gonna do then, to get these lovely birds flying?

    We (they) will do what it takes.

    Reconstruction, re-builds, what does it really matter as long as we can see these magnificent machines take to the sky. The Spitfire in question is just as much a Spitfire as anything else.

    Even if this Spitfire had ben salvaged the right way, and put in a museum, what bloody fun would that be? I would absolutely NOT fly all the way to Hendon to see a wreck of a Spitfire. What I would do is fly all the way to Duxford to see it take to the skies. It’s not like museums doesn’t have a Spitfire hanging from a roof or stuck on it’s wheels somewhere. As interesting as Hendon might be, there’s no roar of engines there. The machines are all dead.

    No, just put them into the air and let us enjoy it. I don’t understand this certain mentality, or even negativity or criticism towards these things and I never will.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1012218
    DCK
    Participant

    Aircraft that does not fly are as pointless as a lead singer with no microphone. 😀

    in reply to: Burma Spitfires #1012224
    DCK
    Participant

    I suspect snow on the containers stopped further digging

    in reply to: Vulcan Suffers Engine Damage #1015524
    DCK
    Participant

    Saw it on Twitter, they had to abort the take off.

    in reply to: Beautifully made clip of la Ferté Alais on Youtube #1015637
    DCK
    Participant

    Very well made indeed

    in reply to: Will it be at Legends 2012 #1016226
    DCK
    Participant

    Agreed. Too much aeroplanes in the same space. The accident happened, no point in pushing on. Do something else instead, the Balbo is not my fave part of the show anyway, but rather a sign that things are about to end. It’s impressive, but a roaring Mustang tailchase does the trick just as good IMO.

    in reply to: Old Warden MAY 26th – Wings & Wheels CANCELLED #1016313
    DCK
    Participant

    Snow on the hangar roof

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1016341
    DCK
    Participant

    Copy ordered 😀

    in reply to: Czech Pilot in The Battle of Britain #1016593
    DCK
    Participant

    Battle of Britain aside, staying in Britain and avoiding the Soviet Union messing up his own country was perhaps his best decision.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1017619
    DCK
    Participant

    With TD248 departing this morning it was soon replaced by the owners Buchon G-AWHE arriving around lunchtime.

    Buchon

    Passing ‘thru ‘DX this afternoon was the RNHF SeaFury T20S G-RNHF but sadly not landing. No pictures either !

    What happened to the white nose?

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,043 total)