dark light

DCK

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 1,043 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BBMF Lanc problem #1065597
    DCK
    Participant

    Hope all is alright

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1067264
    DCK
    Participant

    Are TFC going to operate AR213? The IWM website lists this as static via the fighter collection for the september show?

    Might be an assumption as I thought it was in the care of ARCO?

    Wouldn’t know about that, but Stephen Gray mentioned “flirting” with AR213 “the mother of all Spitfires” in the Legends program for this year. I read it several times, thinking about what he exactly was trying to say.

    in reply to: Aviation publishers #1067878
    DCK
    Participant

    Oh, and a new title for Tor’s book: VIKING SPITFIRE. 🙂

    😀

    http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/222403_10150723225520243_625720242_19765372_7623391_n.jpg

    As for Grub Street, no offense or negativity meant coming from my side. As things went quicker than I anticipated there was just no need to contact. I have them on my Twitter feed as well.

    And I got Andys book “Finding the few” which is top notch, but we all knew that. 😀

    in reply to: BBD flys again.. well kinda.. #1068651
    DCK
    Participant

    THATS’ what it was??

    in reply to: Aviation publishers #1068659
    DCK
    Participant

    With regards to the comment about Grub Street and their long response time, I do understand. I was always taught from my first day in commissioning that it can take an editor up to three months to reply to a pitch/proposal. It’s pretty much an industry standard, especially in large publishers.

    I do not.

    I try to reply with immediate effect and establish a relationship with all my writers in producing great books on aviation. After all, it is in our best interests as we love the topic.

    As I often say: ‘Seize the day’!

    Jay

    The approach is working quite well Jay!

    in reply to: Aviation publishers #1069058
    DCK
    Participant

    Am I correct in my perception that the ‘how much’ issue seems almost to be taboo in the writing and publishing world?

    I’ve never been brave (or foolhardy) enough to write a book (although the material generated by research on some of my pet topics is pushing those in that direction!) and so my experience relates exclusively to magazine and newspaper articles. Also it has little to do with aviation articles, as I have found it significantly harder to secure outlets for these than various of the other topics on which I have written. But even now, I find the fee to be the most difficult matter, particularly to know what a piece is worth and how far this is negotiable.

    I well appreciate that there is no ‘norm’ when it comes to the fee. Small, specialist magazines with smaller circulations usually pay less than large, generalist magazines with larger circulations. But that’s not always the case. Certainly at the outset I took what I was offered by way of a fee. I was grateful just to be published! But as I’ve gained in experience, I’ve realised that there is a great disparity in what one is offered – and that disparity does not always reflect the size of the magazine and its circulation.

    It is a truth universally acknowledged that individuals do not like talking about the subject of their income – even in the most general terms – and, I suspect, in the publishing world this is something that publishers are keen to encourage. But in making that statement, I may be demonstrating shocking ignorance and be guilty of an important inaccuracy. Thus I’d be interested to hear the views of others generally and specifically on this subject.

    I read in an Czech inflight magazine once that you should NEVER ask an Englishmen how much he makes a year!

    in reply to: Aviation publishers #1069330
    DCK
    Participant

    Good to see Jay taking part in this thread, which is turning out to be quite fascinating, and very helpful for those who like to spend time writing about historic aviation.

    Grub Street?

    http://www.grubstreet.co.uk/

    I haven’t approached them yet, as their website informs of a very long waiting time for feedback. I much more prefer Mr. Slaters approach which is extremely fast and to the point! 😀

    in reply to: Aviation publishers #1071212
    DCK
    Participant

    Thank you

    in reply to: Aviation publishers #1071385
    DCK
    Participant

    That is indeed a normal reaction from a publisher. But then, they would say that, wouldn’t they? After all they might have to offer a competitive deal, rather than the author being grateful they are bothering to notice him (or her).

    Given that publishers can take forever to look at a pitch* (and even lose manuscripts) and I really can’t see why the author isn’t entitled to do some comparison shopping among the peers, however much the publisher/s might not like it.

    Yes, I’m a publisher – but unlike many publishers I’ve worked upstream and down from this role, as well.

    Good luck whatever route works. The other think I’d say is be persistent**, too.

    Regards,

    * / ** And those looking hard at me about such delays, indeed, sorry. 😮

    That is, indeed, what I thought when I first read it, but as a first time goer, I decided not to push it! I have however decided to go for English written books as the market in Norway for ANY type of books are so small. Just imagine trying to sell aviation books to a mere 5 million population. Do the numbers 😀

    in reply to: Aviation publishers #1071694
    DCK
    Participant

    They are on my list 🙂

    in reply to: Aviation publishers #1071700
    DCK
    Participant

    Thanks.

    A bit different from what I am used to, but the book I did in my country was not done the normal “route”. Funny you should say you need to have a few pitches out there as I’ve sent out another book to a publishing company here, and they all stated clearly it was rude to send it out to several of them at the same time! So, in my naivety perhaps, I didn’t do it!

    I’ll get in touch JDK

    Some advice.

    Get hold of a copy of The Writers & Artist’s Yearbook (A&C Black, published annually) and follow the advice therein regarding pitching. Most UK public libraries have a reference copy, I’m not sure if your local library would!

    Check anyone you approach actually publishes individual pilot biographies – otherwise you are wasting your, and their time. Likewise, if they do, that your format will match theirs. Some publishers have very rigid series parameters, don’t bother if you can see it isn’t a ‘fit’.

    The History Press suggestion looks a good one.

    Have a one-page pitch prepared, including a content summary and why the book should be taken on and sell. Some will ask for a section / chapter. Present professionally.

    Yes, you can contact my publishing business and we might be interested, but don’t feel you have to! (Link via my autosig.)

    Whatever you do, it’s worth having two or three pitches out together. If you are lucky enough to get interest from more than one publisher, you can see which offer is better (that’s in the round, not just best cash – and it won’t be great).

    Watch out for Vanity Presses. Poison.

    HTH!

    in reply to: Aviation publishers #1071887
    DCK
    Participant

    Thank you 🙂

    in reply to: BoB movie aircraft at Duxford, summer 1968… #1072439
    DCK
    Participant

    Beware.
    Guard dogs.

    in reply to: "Red Tails" trailer. #1076488
    DCK
    Participant

    So it’s better than real aeroplanes..?
    Why make nonsense, when for the same money–quality can be made..?
    The day the last of us give up on the desire to be ‘good’ and to aspire to ‘quality’–then mankind really has got no hope.

    I suggest you read ‘Zen And The Art Of Motorcycle Maintenance’ for a much better explanation of what I’m refering to.
    A.

    Why do I get the feeling you will complain regardless of how this movie will be made?

    Why make nonsense when quality can be made? Did you see it yet? I thought it said January on the screen there.

    If you wanna moan, then at least do it after you’ve seen it.

    in reply to: "Red Tails" trailer. #1076950
    DCK
    Participant

    Seriously can’t be bothered with this CGI negative nonsense.

    It’s a NEW movie about something we all love. It’s either that or nothing these days. This looks to be a great movie.

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 1,043 total)