dark light

orko_8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 509 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tea-kettle nuclear submarines! #2074840
    orko_8
    Participant

    If I read you right, you’re emphasizing on a COTS approach or at least COTS usage in most of sub-systems?

    I think the biggest challenge would be to meet the noise and vibration level criteria. Civilian systems are not designed with the same priority degrees in noise, energy consumption and vibration issues. So, modifying a COTS system for a SSK could be a difficult task.

    Additionally, AFAIK, SSK’s rarely exceed 10-12 knots during their cruises (except extreme conditions during engagements and evasive action). Such system can provide effective cruise speed well above 20 kts, but there comes the nesxt challenge for modifying detection systems (i.e sonars) to work well in those speeds.

    But I concur that littoral submarine design is going to face the incoming problem of more efficient energy generators for more complex sub-systems and speed demands.

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2074857
    orko_8
    Participant

    According to sources, the Navy also considered canceling the second DDG 1000 and building just one, but potentially high cancellation costs led to the decision to keep the ship.

    A tiny emirate in the middle of a Gulf ordering strategic airlifters, the largest and most modern navy of a superpower considering pounding billions of dollars into just ONE destroyer…

    What’s next? Austria ordering CVF????

    in reply to: Help Identify These Fighters: #2463328
    orko_8
    Participant

    I’m pretty sure I saw more of these 3D renders on this forum. They are hypothetical “F-3” designs for Japan’s next generation fighter requirment IIRC.

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2074895
    orko_8
    Participant

    Turkey today selected Type 214 submarines in the new AIP submarine project covering 6 boats, costing 2.5 billion Euro’s; 80% of the project will be met from local industry & off-sets.

    orko_8
    Participant

    “new strategic-airlift mobility capabilities” for the Qatar Armed Forces

    Double-you-tea-aefff????!!!!1111 Is this some kind of a sick joke?

    I want to find the salespeople and business development managers of Boeing responsible of the sale. I want to be their pupil. I want them teach me the secrets of selling a tiny state which covers 1/60 land of Texas LONG RANGE STRATEGIC CARGO AIRCRAFT’s!

    In heaven’s and all the good things’ name, can somebody please, as if talking to a 6-year old kid, explain the motives and justification of this sale? I’m more than perplexed…

    in reply to: Harrier GR.3 and the Paveway II #2471836
    orko_8
    Participant

    Oh and did the Sea Harriers ever get sent on strike missions?

    Sharkey Ward in his book (Sea Harrier over the Falklands) mentiones extensive A2G training sorties using 2.75 ockets, dumb bombs and guns with his squadron while en route to Falklands. His book is out of my reach and cannot remember the details now but I assume it’s highly possible that Sea Harrier’s were used in CAS missions during the conflict.

    in reply to: Harrier GR.3 and the Paveway II #2472076
    orko_8
    Participant

    Anyone knows what GR.9s carry?

    According to Mr. Jane’s:

    “In December 2006 the RAF launched a competition for a replacement targeting pod under an Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) for the Harrier GR. Mk 9. Rafael Litening III and Lockheed Martin Sniper shortlisted to replace TIALD 500. In January 2007 the AN/AAQ-33 Sniper pod was selected on grounds of performance, cost of integration and support cost. Three pods are understood to have been procured.”

    in reply to: Harrier GR.3 and the Paveway II #2472307
    orko_8
    Participant

    I read that the Harrier GR.3 Carried Paveway II bombs in the Falklands conflict. I know the GR.3 had a nose mounted laser range finder plus a marked target finder or spot tracker. Was the GR.3 also capable of designating targets it self or did it need a third party like a FAC to designate targets for it?

    Thanks in advance for any useful answers.

    Harrier GR.3 had Ferranti-made LRMTS (Laser Rangefinder and Marked Target Spotter). As the name implies and you already have mentioned, the system calculates the closure rate and distance of a specified spot via laser radar and detects an illuminated target. But this system did not give the GR.3 the capability to illuminate targets itself afaik.

    in reply to: Return of the Gorshkov saga #2075405
    orko_8
    Participant

    I bet the Ex-Gorshkov because some drunk Russian worker will leave a blow torch by his bottle of vodka and burn the whole ship down! Any other theories how this will end?

    Maybe the shipyard will eventually realize they were installing the flight deck to the wrong side of the hull and request another billion dollars to remove it and another extra billion to install it to the right place?

    in reply to: Full-Frontal Pics #2474506
    orko_8
    Participant

    It looks as if, while designing the Tu-160, engineers had forgotten to add the engines (because the airframe was too smooth to have a couple), and at the very last minute they just attached them beneath the body! 😛

    By the way it seems the lady in the photo gets more attraction than the monster she’s standing by!

    in reply to: Hun Pics #2474600
    orko_8
    Participant

    French Huns were in Djibouti? What for?

    An Iraqi F-1 shot down a THK F-100F? I’ve never heard of that. What happened?

    Details are not fully known but according to official statement, the aircraft was part of a two-craft formation and accidentally crossed the border by navigational mistake. This may or may not be the case, since Iraq and Turkey signed a hot pursuit aggreement allowing Turkish troops to enter Northern Iraq by a limited distance while pursuing terrorist and / or smuggler gangs. My theory is that the aircraft was conducting a recon or CAS mission against a terrorist or smuggler target in Northern Iraq. During the height of Iran – Iraq War, it should be misidentified as an Iranian a/c striking Iraqi targets, or just punished for violating the airspace. I don’t know.

    The aircraft was from 8. Main Jet Base, most probably from 182. Squadron.

    The wreckage was reported to be found several years later by Turkish commando units conducting cross-border operations in the region.

    in reply to: Unlikeliest shootdowns? #2474699
    orko_8
    Participant

    I am not sure if this is the incident you are thinking about but on 12th March 1971 RAAF Huey A2-767 was shot down while hovering and winching a South Vietnamese mine victim who had lost both legs. The helicopter crashed onto and killed the mine victim and an American adviser, an Australian adviser was killed by a rotor hit to the head and a medic on board was also killed.

    Paul

    Thank you. That’s most probably the incident I was talking about. Cheers

    in reply to: Hun Pics #2474707
    orko_8
    Participant

    Turkish AF F-100D 54-2238 was shot down by anti-aircraft fire on July 22nd, 1974 during the Cyprus conflict

    Another interesting Hun shoot down: Turkish AF F-100F, 56-3903, was shot down over Northern Iraq by a Super 530 missile fired from an Iraqi Air Force Mirage F1, Sept 1983. Pilot ejected safely.

    in reply to: Hun Pics #2474795
    orko_8
    Participant

    Two Hun’s from TuAF…

    in reply to: growth potential of Eurocanards #2476620
    orko_8
    Participant

    What??? There was a Greece vs Turkey thing and I’ve missed? OMG!!!11

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 509 total)