There will be two seperate LCS designs, just as the JSF or ATF projects. Lockheed Martin consortium is building LCS-1 and LCS-3 while General Dynamics LCS-2 and LCS-4. These four ships are classified as “LCS Flight 0”. After completion, they will be tested for some period, after which the winner design will be announced. General Dynamics LCS, a trimaran design was laid down on January 16th.
If I recall exactly there was another competitor (Raytheon?) at the very beginning of the project, but was eliminated / rejected later.
Orko- I see you are in Istanbul. Any info on NATO exercises with both Greece and Turkey present??? Level of cooperation? (if any) Military relations with NATO framework etc???
Well I have been waiting with my camera for the ships to come and pay a visit to Bosporus 🙂
As far as I know they changed its official name and now it’s IASF = Israeli Air and Space Force.
I highly doubt that this photo was taken during a funeral praying. The reason is:
In Islam, every Muslim has to pray 5 times a day. (It’s name is “namaz”). During namaz, you take certain positions, one of which is bending on your knees and putting your forehead onto the ground. But during funeral prayings, this is not executed, all praying is done while standing. The photo is not very clear, but I think it shows people while on that bended position.
Plus,
It is almost impossible to tell from a FLIR image of an UAV the difference of a funeral praying than a line-up, since there is no body action in funeral praying, you do not move, only hands near your ears once or twice.
This news looks like “hey, we have respect to religious matters” PR thingie…
My guess is, someone own’d badly and tried to cover up things with a PR cammo…
What are the chances to find a good video of a Sea Zenith? 0.1%?.. 0.01%? Turkish Navy PR videos show only one or two seconds of them firing..
The MiG-39 looks like a distant cousin of Yak-130 design.
That guy obviously has good skills..
Front fuselage looks like a sweet combination of F-18, F-16 and Rafale.. Very impressive piece of art though
MRTP-33 uses RGM-84 Harpoon Block II via data link; there is also provision for Exocet and Penguin as well.
No actual article published that pic, the guys doing it, just pasted the pic above some article of inrelevant contest (Thougth they migth have ‘touched’ the text itself, i cannot remember)
I stand corrected and hail the level of art I am witnessing…
MilTech really published this article, yes? It is a very embarassing situation for a highly respected defense magazine to cover an article about a non-existing weapon system.
By showing this aircraft Iran says two things:
1 (For international public): 27 years passed since and we still manage to fly US made aircraft, even modify them.
2 (For own public): We have the ability to design and produce an aircraft.
I don’t believe that an old airframe like F-5E with stress loading modifications such as twin tails (note rectangular parts on the tail fin roots) and the same good ol’ J85 would help build a fighter that can meet the standards of modern air warfare. But it must also be noted that Iran has been putting great effort for indigenous weapon systems, an effort that must be respected, I think.
Could the earlier F-5s be rebuilt into this aircraft?
Could be. In fact I, too, think that the aircraft shown flying is a converted F-5E rather than a fresh produced version. But this of course does not mean Iranians are not spending effort on producing a fighter, be it Saeqeh or something else.
As far as I know, no European country wanted to sell Taiwan diesel electric submarines, with keeping the fragile nature of Chinese-EU relations in mind. This forced Taiwan to look for US for diesel subs, which US doesn’t produce anymore since WWII and reluctant to ever build again.
I believe that nowadays EU has China at the top of priority list, because of a complicated mixture of political, economic and military reasons. This mixture prevented them from selling subs to Taiwan, which may further prevent them to sell advanced fighters as well.
I think especially Gripen would be the logical choice for Taiwan with its advanced avionics, low cost and ability to operate from highways, but because of the reasons I mentioned, I highly doubt it will ever materialize. I see a new US assisted fighter project as highly possible.
At the bottom line, I think China’s rise as an economic and military power and her improving relations with Europe, limited the freedom of strategic maneouverability of Taiwan, thus forcing to rely on (more) solely on US. But that’s hardly the subject of an F-15 thread 😀
I doubt if F-15 would be a good choice for a country like Taiwan. F-15 is big, heavy, expensive to operate, expensive to maintain, expensive to train. I think a multirole fighter which has balance between modern avionics and affordability would be better choice for a country like Taiwan, if you add into account that foreign threat is asymmetrically greater in terms of number and firepower. Expensive and complex fighters mean smaller squadrons, which decreases tolerance to loss of fighters and more importantly pilots, the number of which is already very limited. A cheaper, lighter but yet modern multirole fighter at least helps maintaining a remarkable air force. I think Gripen, Mirage2000 Mk5, F-16 Block50+/52+, MiG-29SMT would be rational choices rather than F-15.