Libyan MiG-21 crashed in Tobruk.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-03/three-dead-as-libyan-war-plane-crash-caught-on-camera/5715734

^
That’s 2S9 NONA self-propelled 120 mm mortar.

Ask for your F-16 infactuation, just get over it, the Typhoon’s TWR, wing loading and avionics will ensure it rapes an F-16 in any legitimate dog-fight, or any climb or acceleration contest. You’ve really brought a turkey to a gun-fight on that one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAedQ7FMiKo
I guess this wasn’t “legitimate dogfight”.

1- Did you measured the climb, turn or acceleration performance? 600 to 1100 km/h time? S/L climb rate? ITR? STR? To be very honest, I’ve always found OVT shows to be lacking the sudden acceleration and sustained turn performance of ordinary MiG-29, maybe related to the show planning IDK.
2-IIRC, engines did not recieve MK upgrade, instead they are RD-133s with new smokeless FADEC and uprated to 5600kg dry 9000kg, which was the basis of the RD-33MK?
3- Relevance? Like other aircraft, MiG-29 is built by man, and upgraded by man using present days technology. I thought it would be relevant to say there is no single example of a fighter that got lighter than the initial variant, after recieving several iterations of thorough upgrades.

MiG-29KUB 967 had empty weight of 12200kg. Single seat MiG-29K might have slightly less weight, although due to extra 600L fuel tank it could be the same.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuCvUTNLe0E this is MiG-29M prototype 156 (9-15) performing at Farnborough ’92. Notice 360 at 2:31-2:46. However, we have to take in consideration that it was flown by highly experienced test pilot Roman Taskayev. Recent displays almost certainly involve G limitations, since RAC MiG does not have abundance of airframes for both test flights and airshow displays.

Erithrean MiG-29s scored kills against Ethiopian MiG-21s. IDF/AF vs SyAAF incident was never confirmed by either side.

That depends a lot regarding how true, or widespread, the rumors about state of Zaslon’s are. Those rumors do have a lot of weight, considering they were made by someone who works/worked on Foxhounds.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=-JbpiC8Kn7k at 2:12 according to MiG-31 crew low flying cruise missile was locked on at a distance of 90km. Most likely the problems with Zaslon experienced during testing have been solved.

What part is nonsense exactly? First part of most flight manuals is about how to operate the aircraft. In a sense, its sufficient to say allowed G limit is 7.33Gs. Second part is about combat performance, where it states when it is safe to exceed 7.33Gs. They are BOTH allowed limits and obviously they can be exceeded unless FCS limits it like on F-16/18. However, In my opinion, any comment about how these limits can be exceeded is nonsense. We heard F-15s pulled 12+ Gs in Iraq or MiG-29/Su-27 manual shows they can not only exceed, but also sustain 10+Gs. As far as technical comparison is concerned that brings us nowhere.

Andraxxus, at what part of flight envelope MiG-29 can sustain 10Gs and how it will effect turn rate? Thanks

I find it very hard to believe that F-15SE will have the same RCS as F-35.