dark light

mobryan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 211 through 224 (of 224 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Report:N.Korea performed first-ever nuke test-What's next? #2548417
    mobryan
    Participant

    Now Rueters is reporting that there is still no radiation in the NK atmosphere.

    Deep ground burst, or ???

    Matt

    mobryan
    Participant

    Nowhere was I stating that trading SAMs for SDBs was a good idea.
    I was just commenting that it would be easier to track the 250lb bomb, than the full size aircraft it came from.
    Old hat, perhaps, but still amazing when you think of it.
    Now, how long before they make a LO SDB? 😉

    Is it even feasible to have a LO freefall weapon? I know various reduced-RCS missiles have been tested, but is the technology available to keep a LO shape in stable flight through the flight envelope of a gravity bomb?

    Matt

    mobryan
    Participant

    I think they’d have better luck tracking the SDB itself…

    Matt

    in reply to: Space Based Weapon systems #1807258
    mobryan
    Participant

    Against most asteroids worth firing something at to stop it a big nuke probably wouldn’t be too much use. Blast waves in space are nonexistant… a nuke generates a lot of heat and concentrated energy in space but its blast effect is pathetic. A lot also depends upon the material the rock is made from… a perfect hit with a powerful nuke that burys itself to the core of the object might just turn it to gravel but not have the energy to disipate that gravel. At 60km/s it is mass times velocity that converts the energy… a trillion tons of gravel, a trillion tons of pure iron, a trillion tons of ice cream… they would all explode with very similar force on impact with the earth.

    But, and maybe I’m looking at this wrong, wouldn’t a trillion tons of gravel burn up more in the atmosphere then a trillion ton solid rock? Having massively more surface area?
    I think any attempt at a nuclear astroid killer would have to incorperate a SERIOUS penetrator cap, make the objects energy work against it. I admit, it would do jack-all against a ferrous asteroid, but it’s effectiveness against a stoney asteroid or a comet would be orders of magnitude better than an airburst nuclear explosion.

    in reply to: Space Based Weapon systems #1807262
    mobryan
    Participant

    So we’ve got Rods of God and Balls of God. Anything else? 😀

    Bad, Bad, BAD!!!

    LOL!!!!!!

    Matt

    in reply to: Space Based Weapon systems #1807286
    mobryan
    Participant

    My “rod of god” would actually be a sphere.

    Tungsten main shell, hollowed inside to provide room for INS/GPS navigation and microwave plasma jet(s) for retro and attitude rockets. Carbon phenolic outer shell, to keep the electronics under temp, until the thickening atmosphere will render the plasma jets useless.

    Not large, going more for a low CEP (hence the protected nav. and rockets) and large numbers.

    My .03 cents, Canadian 😉

    Matt

    in reply to: F-112 to F-116: the missing years. #2563135
    mobryan
    Participant

    For the record, it should be mentioned that Ben Rich stated that ‘117’ was a meaningless Lockheed in-house working designation for Senior Trend long before it was built, and that the number stuck.

    Any citation? I’ve gone through the revelent parts of “Skunk Works”. Just wondering if I missed it or it was someplace else.

    thanks,

    Matt

    in reply to: F-112 to F-116: the missing years. #2565047
    mobryan
    Participant

    You know, I’ve used Andreas site for years, and somehow scanned competly over that section… Learn something new every day.

    Thanks, all

    Matt

    in reply to: F-112 to F-116: the missing years. #2565055
    mobryan
    Participant

    That explains that part, then.

    now how about the F-117?

    Matt

    in reply to: BAE clinches 2.5 Billion Pound Tornado upgrade deal #2570964
    mobryan
    Participant

    Let me remind you that Saudi Arabia is a brutal dictatorship with strict one family rule, with no freedom of religion, no freedom for press and practically non-existant human rights for women…. :rolleyes: So, where is your invasion rhetoric now?

    Huh? And what does THIS have to to with the price of tea in China??? :confused:

    in reply to: ranking of beautiful aircraft by nation and epoch #2571124
    mobryan
    Participant

    Brits have made some of the most atractive airplanes of all time…….Hunter, Sea Hawk, Vulcan, Victor, Spitfire, Lancaster……now……what happened with Typhoon? BOTH of them! The French have made some REALLY elegant jets too!

    On the subject of Brittish jets, what about the Lightening? Wow.

    My top 5

    BaC Lightening
    Lockheed A-12
    M-50 Bounder
    Draken
    Mig-15

    in reply to: how low do aircraft come over your house? #2582332
    mobryan
    Participant

    With the odd geography of Ellsworth AFB, we routinely get B-1B’s at 500′ in landing pattern. Sometimes lower if it’s a new pilot 😮

    Back when we had the BUFF here, things could really get hairy.

    in reply to: SIZE COMPARISON THREAD #2583096
    mobryan
    Participant

    Wonderful thread.
    I always *knew* the F-104 was small, but wow… put that next to a Mig-31.

    Any chance of adding a G model 104 to the list, A13x?

    in reply to: Searching for the most bizare plane ever… #2571363
    mobryan
    Participant

    No pics, but how about most of the Blumm und Voss products from WWII??

Viewing 14 posts - 211 through 224 (of 224 total)