Before you jump on these figures with an argument *but US are much more developed and industrialized than worldwide average and therefore require more*, yes, that is true. Now, let us have a look at other developed countries and their oil consumption:
– Germany – 11.7 bbl/year per capita
– Spain – 14.2 bbl/year per capita
– Japan – 15.9 bbl/year per capita
– Israel – 14.2 bbl/year per capitacompare to US and Canada
– United States – 25.2 bbl/year per capita
– Canada – 25.1 bbl/year per capita
Considering the size of the countries in question, I’m not surprised. Just to bring the students in and out of school in my town takes almost 250 gallons of fuel, per day, or about 3 gallons/ student. There is room for SOME improvement with more efficient buses, but not much, you still have 1200+ miles to drive per day. Many nations, with higher population density and simply smaller, will have proportionally small oil demands.
Just pointing out, there is more then just economy or development to account for a counties oil use. Size plays a major factor.
Matt
I’ve always used “No longer OF use”, myself. That’s a spirit of the posts, anyhow, all the cool planes that COULD be of use, but no longer are used 🙁 🙁 🙁
Matt
[QUOTE=RPSmith;1205301][QUOTE=AndyG;1205264] …. still the only museum piece in the world which isn’t obsolete! ….
What about the several SHARs in museums :confused: :diablo:
Roger Smith.
And the Blackbirds???
😀
Matt
Personal Aircraft:
Storch: For the cabin in the way-back-of-beyond that I’ll buy 😉
PBY-6A: Mobile beach-bum palace.
F-5E or J35C Draken: Fun, fast, room for two :diablo:
Flying Rodeo Airshow:
TU-92 Boot
A2D Skyshark
Westland Wyvren
Fairey Gannet
TB2D SkyPirate
Tu-142 Cleat for support/ mobile barracks.
Matt
And do you have black budgets now? This is no longer the Cold War. You’re not going to hide a 2 billion dollar sub that easily.
Umm- why would we be hiding the whole sub in a black program??? :confused:
Matt
Yes, that’s the disadvantage of pinging. The advantage however, nothing escapes from it. Nothing. It will only be a matter of time before detection. So, if you’re in a sub, once you hear the active pinging, will you still conduct business as usual?
If I hear a ping, I’d point down the bearing line, put a mk48 out in a very slow search mode, and pretend to be a giant hole in the ocean, which, BTW the Ohio does VERY well.
Matt.
P.S. I’d also put out a call on the sat com system, I won’t be operating alone.
P.P.S How long would a radiating Song actually last with a USN SSN around?
I do have to say that the B-1B has turned into something of an amusing CAS asset. They can hang around for a good bit of time waiting for a call, and in Afghanistan they were called in sometimes to do nothing more than overfly the insurgent positions at low altitude and obnoxious speed.
Rather expensive flash/bangs, but VERY persistant 😀
Matt
Environmental conditions in the littorals make subs hard to acquire. Did you think such problems affect only the USN and not the PLAN? Especially when the PLAN has sensors that are probably at least a generation behind the US? Worse so is the fact that the Ohio was designed not to be found, and has been upgraded steadily.
“Nothing is quite so hard to find, as an Ohio that doesn’t wish to be found”
I’d credit the quote if only I remembered where I heard it 😮
Matt
Some of the HAWKs were “newer” than the AIM-54s, as they benefitted during the 1980s from spares that were sourced through Israel.
Also, your average SAM can last a bit longer than an AAM. Each time you hang a live AAM from an aircraft and fly it about, there is a degree of damage done to the internal avionics and whatnot. They can be repaired to a degree, but most legacy systems at the very least (not too sure if this has been rectified on 21st century AAMs or not) did have a sort of “shelf life” as it pertained to time spent under the wing or fuselage of a fighter. A SAM sitting on the ground not doing anything isn’t affected by a lot of the stresses an AAM is when it is carried aloft. SAMs have their own things to deal with, such as corrosion and the like, but AFAIK those are less labor intensive to rectify.
Thanks 🙂
Matt
Anyway, here’s one reason why an air campaign (only speaking to that aspect) over Iran wouldn’t be as difficult as one might think:
http://geimint.blogspot.com/2007/09/iranian-sam-network.html
Sean- one thing that I find slightly confusing, is that while there seems to be a great awareness of the age/unreliabilty of many of the US supplied AAM’s (AIM-54,ect), the equally old HAWK missiles still seem to have a starring role in the Iranian AD network.
I find this slightly confusing, since the ground based missiles can be replaced/augmented by different types with relative ease, as compared to the integration issues of a AAM?
Matt
Flex, nationalism and religion make men other than rational beings. with both combined, I can safely say that men akin to Bush / Chenney and institutions akin to the AIPAC will have plenty of acolytes to run the party line.
I think Star Wars was an amazing movie and touched upon this very well. Remember that the Republic voted to have Darth Sidius turn it into the Empire. Today’s darth Sidius is the AIPAC and today’s General Devious is OBL.
Iran is just stuck in the middle of this. Like Naboo it shall be eliminated by a death star (read F-22s)
😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀
Your point is understood, but man, your Star War’s-Fu is weeeeeeek 😉
Matt
Good riddance to rotten rubbish, IMO.
Matt
They also did some stuff with a lineat aerospike mounted on a pylon back there as well.
http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Movie/SR-71/640x/EM-0025-05.mov
Well, that goes into my “things I learned today” file 😉
Matt
The piggyback was limited to some test vehicles for the Tagboard project, AFIK.
Matt
Martin P6M SeaMaster, Vought F8U-3 Crusader III, and North American F-107.
oooo- Seamaster, I’d forgotten about that one. Better performance then a B-52, and amphibious… :drool:
Matt