Probably!-no idea what the difference is!
One you can drink, the other……………………….
Not ‘inherently unsafe’ – but much less safe using the much higher flowrates commonly used by the modern VC10 and Tristar tankers as opposed to the original Victors.
Interesting, I was always under the impression that they all had the same HDU fitted.
Yes,and i think the CAA may have some issues with future Avon operation.
I would have thought that there was some design/manufacture back-up still.
http://www.rolls-royce.com/energy/products/default.jsp
All most right it was becasue the Lightning has no back up system to the hydraulics for the controls
Yes it has, it’s built by Martin Baker 🙂
The complexity of reheat?
The excrutiating tyre wear?
The poisonous Avpin?
The ludicrous landing speed?
The high fuel consumption?
The fuel leaks?
The hydraulics that require lots of TLC.
Probably loads more I couldn’t think of in such a short time.
In short, it requires an awful lot of maintenance which would make it a poor risk in the eyes of the CAA.
It is one hell of a kite though.
Seeing as that is a II (ac) aircraft I would venture that it is a recce pod.
Hi Paul
Don’t think they ever had a Voice Recorder (it was always a recommendation of Boards of Inquiry) Standby Compass (E2B) should be relatively available. You should get an e-mail soon detailing the NSNs to go with the AJAX unit.
John
The recce a/c used to have a tape recorder fitted in RAFG if my memory serves me well. They could both record or play cassette tapes.
1 The plenum chamber?
It’s just a system of registration. It started with ‘A’ and has worked upwards since. That is why you see alot of five figure usernames on this site.
Ie: XL231, XH668 etc. Since the early ’40’s they have been using a five digit group with two letters followed by three numbers. They are just tail numbers allotted to airframes. As long as the a/c is in service it will retain this number. If it is retained for non-operational use it will be allocated a ‘maintenance’ number. This is also a five digit number consisting of four numbers followed by an M.
Metallurgy dictates the maximum diameter for centrifugal compressors in propulsion applications. Get them too large in diameter and they tend to burst at high RPM if FOD is introduced. This pretty much limits them to engines where total airflow isn’t large – helicopters, missiles, business jets and trainers. Centrifugal compressors are a favorite of designers for environmental control air cycle machines due to their durability and light weight.
A large centrifugal might burst if fodded however it remains less susceptable to fod than an axial flow.
The two major disadvantages of a centrifugal is it’s low pressure ratio and large frontal area. The use of an axial/centrifugal compressor isn’t new. The Proteus turbo prop used it. A major advantage of this is you can shorten the engine length by using a reverse flow compressor.
Some more articles on this story:
Hmm, interesting point in the second article about Boeing having 50 years experience in IFR (in flight refuelling). What isn’t said is that they were introduced to it by a British company called Flight Refuelling, known these days as Cobham. I think that European experience in IFR should be adequate for the job.
ok then here’s another one, see if you can tell where this is 😀
Inward vent valve?
250 gal ventral that is.
Ok then next quiz question
Where is fuse 117 located in the lightning
320psi and mjr……you cant play i know you’ll both know 😀
Scott
In the elephant’s ear?
A few I haven’t seen here yet.
Ju 52 “Tante Ju”
Me 323 “The sticking plaster bomber”
C130 “Fat Albert”
You might want to try the Rolls Royce Heritage Trust. They are trying to rationalise their collection at the moment. If they have one spare you might be able to negotiate a long term loan.