dark light

Robert Hilton

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 673 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MH434 Rivets #1261399
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    I forgot British standard fasteners…They are measured in furlongs or something right?

    Never hit a SP rivet in my life (they are almost just a legend now 🙂 )

    SP80 = AN430AD i think (the round head).

    Rivets do correspond to AN/MS/NAS in sizing, with diameter in 1/32 and length in 1/16 inch.
    So SP80-405 would be 1/8″ dia 5/16″ long.
    I’ve got a fair stock of AGS rivets SP70/71/78/80, AS 2200 series plus Avdel and MBC. It’s not that scarce.

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #1262832
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    Hi Robert,

    Xl231 has used 127.5 units of FI since her conversion to a K2. Thats over 6385hrs 30 mins total flying time since conversion.

    Ollie

    A mainplane on the stress test airframe failed at 127 FI.
    Just thought you’d like to know.

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #1265798
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    Hi Welsh HTE,

    The way we describe the aircraft is in an airworthy condition, but not allowed to fly, this is due to the cost of recertifying all the components, even though we have all the documentation for the aircraft.

    Peter, Any spares would be appreciated, we do have quite a large amount, but you never know what you might need, anything is usefull!

    The HDU was succesfully installed yesterday with no major snags, we are now going to carry out the functional tests to ensure everything on the aircraft side is OK. Will post some photos soon.

    Ollie

    So, how many FI units does the airframe have?
    Good luck with the HDU functionals.

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #1268267
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    I don’t think the airfield itself will be coming up for development any time soon, they have just repainted the runway markings for a start!

    The planning permission (which was turned down) was for building on the land right next to the museum entrance, ehich would have spoiled the effect somewhat!

    The HDU scoop was successfully taken off today and we will be giving the Bomb bay a clean tomorrow, ready for fitting of the HDU on Sunday!

    Ollie

    Is it a fully working HDU?
    Do you have any documentation?

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #1269121
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    Great photo’s and good to see you’ve got a HDU as well.
    Takes me back (quite) a few years when they still resided at Marham.

    in reply to: Museum Static aircraft tyres #1291870
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    That would seem the most logical solution. I have had a B25 nosewheel blow on me. Fortunately there was no-one in the vicinity.

    in reply to: Tornado ADV and IDS, success or bust? #2509719
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    The team that tackled Foxhunter was not not over-endowed with up-to-date air-to-air experience. Their Ferranti opposite numbers had some interesting views on where the Foxhunter project went astray.

    It is interesting to note that the Lightning was fitted with the AI 23 and the Tornado with the AI 24. It does show a certain lack of continuity in development.

    in reply to: Recovered Merlin engines available #1294350
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    If you need any help with moving them Cees, then pm me.
    I can’t promise anything, but I can always give it a shot.

    in reply to: Photos from RAF Middleton St George #1296824
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    The HP Victor in the background appears to have a serial number in the XL 18? or 19? range, which would make it very new at that time. So new, in fact, I suspect the picture may be later than stated (but I’m willing to be corrected on that as I have limited reference material). Also the tail of the Valiant appears to be peeping out behind the Vic – I don’t suppose you’ve got a shot of the two of them together?

    You can see it is a B2 indicated by the RAT intakes, stubwing and the fin extension intake. I keep staring at the photo and I think I see a 1 at the end which would make it XL191.

    in reply to: Gas Turbine Technical Question #1305096
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    A Free power turbine generally means a turboshaft engine where the drive is taken to the rotor head via a reduction gearbox.

    Keithmac

    I’ll have to add my 2 cents here.
    A free power turbine engine is an engine with a compressor/turbine section in the normal sense with an added turbine behind that which is connected to the drive/propellor. This turbine runs independantly of the rest so allowing the compressor to run at a more optimum rpm. A normal turbine will extract about50% of the thrust out of the gas stream to turn the compressor. The free power turbine will extract the rest for the drive. Depending on configuration (turbo-prop, helicopter etc) about 10% of the gas stream velocity remains over as thrust.

    in reply to: Marham Victor #1312760
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    She looks great, good job well done. Did you know that there is one part that is fitted in both the Halifax and Victor. One small bungee cord is exactly the same in both types.

    Cheers

    Cees

    Check out the navigation lights, I think you might find a similarity.

    in reply to: Dassault Avon powered Mirage IIIO prototype #2523903
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    I’m confused now. 🙁

    The French-language sources specifically state that the Avon RA.24 was tested on one of the Mirage IIIO prototypes, and found to be inferior to the Atar despite being more powerful. Meanwhile, English-language sources specifically refer to the RA.24’s successor, the RB.146 being installed on Mirage IIIO-01.

    The difference isn’t academic, since compared to the RA.24, the RB.146 had an extra zero stage compressor, higher pressure ratio and therefore higher thrust (~1,000lbs more dry thrust?).

    Who’s more credible? English publications from that time period, or the recollections of SNECMA engineers in the 1980s (who know their stuff but could very well be biased or simply confused about Rolls Royce designations)???

    What you say is correct, the RB146 was fitted to the Mirage. The 146 (300 series Avon) didn’t have an extra zero stage, it had an extra stage that was numbered zero. Most compressors do begin with stage one. This engine was also fitted with a con-di ejector nozzle which helped increase gas velocity in reheat. The test pilot commented on the improved thrust from the nozzle.

    in reply to: Handley Page Victor cockpit #1318567
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    I don’t know about the owner but I would be very happy to show off the cockpit of the only Victor to break the sound barrier if it was mine.

    in reply to: Valiant tankers #1326788
    Robert Hilton
    Participant
    in reply to: New Merlins #1328803
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    In one of the RR service manuals, it describes undoing the main bearing nuts to remove the crankshaft, the procedure requires a dial gauge to be located on the main bolt stud, and to slacken off a few thou at a time on each bolt (in a set order); I can just about understand the need for a dial gauge on assembly, but disassembly….

    Possible distortion of the cap, it’s not unusual to have rather solid looking assemblies distort if they are dismantled wrongly.

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 673 total)