dark light

Robert Hilton

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 673 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dambusters Declassified – BBC2, 17th Oct 8PM. #1105434
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    The first is correct

    in reply to: Lightning Wing Tanks #1106527
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    Indeed all fuel had to be dumped before the over wing tanks could be jettisoned.
    If I remember correctly what C/T Jarred told me (ground runner of the Lightning in Dr FOD) the tanks were 270 gals each and it required 270 gals to overcome the extra drag.

    in reply to: Ejector seat rail id #1111527
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    The Bucc is a mk7 seat (zero-zero)

    in reply to: 56 Sqn "Checkerboard" tail Lightnings? #1117182
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    It served as ‘L’ for a few years on 56

    in reply to: 56 Sqn "Checkerboard" tail Lightnings? #1118263
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    XP743 was recorded as ‘G’ for 56 in 4.65
    XP744 ‘H’, 745 ‘J’, 746 ‘K’, 747 ‘L’and 748 ‘M’.
    According to my source anyway.

    in reply to: Vulcanologists Question Number Two! #1119942
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    Re the pylons Chox.
    I assume they used the same hard points as the planned Skybolt pylons. There were a number of a/c fitted with them. The hard points were even used during the Black Buck operations for Shrike and ECM

    in reply to: Surprising what you can find with a Metal Detector #1121897
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    Impressive

    in reply to: Sea Vixen AAR Tanker Panel #1121957
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    Hi Pagen
    They were indeed fitted to the K2 Victor on the stbd side, Nav rad postion on his left. Two side-by side above the HDU panel. I believe that they were moved to the AEO position when the a/c were modded for a four man crew.
    Sorry no pics though.

    in reply to: Vulcanologists Question Number Two! #1123229
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    An interesting shot of a mk17b HDU being fitted, are you sure they are 200 series? I was always led to believe that the last B2’s had 300’s. I’ve not seen any other engines with plates like that, they don’t look like reinforcing or for trimming so your own answer could be right.

    in reply to: Vulcanologists Question Number Two! #1123795
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    Do you have some photo’s?

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2401658
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    I have no dispute with either you or over G, I agree with you both. Just clarifying that I read it correctly.

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2401726
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    @ over G
    First, the only time I’ve been called Mr was by my ex Commanding Officer when I demobbed;)

    What I read of the DSI tests is that it serves the same purpose as a VG intake and auxilliary doors without the complexity and weight. Fixed intakes on supersonic (Mn 2+) a/c isn’t new. Even the Lightning had a fixed intake, albeit with a spike.
    The tests showed that you get the same performance with DSI in your bench mark a/c, in this case a block 30 F16. That is why it was tested up to Mn 2. It says nothing about the top speed of the F35, it merely says we can produce the intake far simpler, lighter and cheaper than previous versions, and you don’t lose any performance
    I had assumed you were saying roughly the same.

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2401736
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    I responed to what he posted, not what you think he was trying to say.

    Then you failed to understand what was written.
    This has often been a noticable fault of yours.

    in reply to: HP Victor XL161 incident in Australia #1092154
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    Yep, the Victors were all different. Exchanging panels with other a/c was not done. Even fitting the spectacles (jetpipe fairings) could involve a “walk around the pan” to fit all the Dzus fasteners. There were countless lines in the spares book stating “applicable to……. only”
    Discussions with Woodford about these were technical diversions tended to include the sentence “oh yes, we know about that”.

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2402063
    Robert Hilton
    Participant

    No it does not. Here is the text of the entire article.
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?p=1380650#post1380650

    What he is trying to say is that it fulfills the same function as a VG intake, namely, supply the air to the engine at a velocity of around 0.4-0.5Mn under all conditions with the minimum of losses. It just does it without all those heavy and expensive to make movey bits, that also cost alot more in maintenance during the a/c’s lifetime.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 673 total)