Sorted! After all these years..nicely done that man!
Was it the canopy ??
ISTR (bearing in mind I havent touched a Canberra AP since 1977 :D) that the official name for a canberra ‘fishbowl’ canopy was ……
‘Hood Coupe’
You are quite right Mr Baz..even on the labelling on the box it comes it is labelled “coupe”, or “coupe hood”.
I did always wonder why that was myself too..
Bruce, I also have a sizeable quantity available, let me know if you are still in need.
Colin,
Any leads on a new nosewheel rim would be handy! The old one with the perished tyre is very reluctant to let the tyre go to be replaced with the old stock new one we have – any handy gen would be welcomed!
Cheers
Timbo
That Timbo character needs a bloomin’ haircut!
😮
Very polite Milt! 😀
I am just a lowdown goodfernuthin’ jet-junkie really!
Dave i’ve not told a soul about that ……….?
Unplanned hop you made in the Vixen last night…?
That’ll be the one!
Great link, thanks Grumpy!
Seeing the aircraft haging from ceiling (ie seeing the underside which is what I would have seen on the beach) it certainly looks like the image in my memory.
What I could really do with is a photo of the undercarriage in place – that’s the only difference I can see ebtween this Queensland exhibit and thr thing we dug up – we definitely had a fixed and very rudimentary undercarriage which consisted of a rubber cylinder, a tubular leg, and a forked bearer. One of the legs is still lurking in my parents garage somewhere – the only thing holding it in place after all those years in the beach was the pressure of the sand around it. as with the photo’s, I really must find it soon!
which raises the question, would the “winged target MkII” have been powered or towed? If powered, by what; and if towed, also by what ? (it is quite a sizeable beast!)
Interesting stuff chaps, thanks for the replies so far 🙂
Great story Peter, I would imagine one of these targets flying askew would cause some serious drag and handling issues for the tug aircraft!
Would that be Blakeney, Forest of Dean, John?
Ah I see – what are the chances of both having quaysides eh! 😮
any takers?
Am beginning to wonder if it is even an aircraft component at all, seems too identification mark-less!
good lord, have I become a bus part collector? 😮
It came from a recently acquired consignment of 50/60s aircraft cockpit equipment acquired in a private deal so wrongly assumed it was of aircraft origin. The lack of stamps and numbers did ring bells, but it’s a nice lump of Bakelite so what they heck!
Thanks guys, think you might well be right!
Wow, I have reached a new low – a confused possibly vintage bus or boat part collector..maybe..
I need to get out more 😮