dark light

philip turland

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 622 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: (Zombie thread from 2002) 558 hopes dashed ? #1320667
    philip turland
    Participant

    Ok but No tounges though

    and here i am agreeing with you again……..”The worst part, from my point of view is that we have just waved farewell to any chance of EVER getting lottery funding for a realistic project”

    in reply to: (Zombie thread from 2002) 558 hopes dashed ? #1320684
    philip turland
    Participant

    At last i see sense emerging

    here is my thumbnail sketch

    25 chaps (marshalls)………there were 25 clock cards on the wall last time i was allowed in there

    lets say £90.00 per hour charged out, 8 hours per day
    25 x 8 x 90 = £18,000/day

    18,000 x 5 = £90,000 per week
    90,000 x 4 = £360,000 per month

    2.73 million divided by £360,000 = about 7.5 months work

    I think they started working in about July…………ok so about 9 months ago….maybe some of my figs are out a bit, maybe only 20 guys, maybe only £50.00 per hour, point still stands

    this doesn’t include VOC employees salaries or buying any bits.

    100% increase in contractors costs kinda says to me the need another 9 months to finish it.

    IMHO It was never gonna happen………….ask anyone actually involved in aviation their true gut feelings

    major sponsers ain’t that stupid to put that sort of money into something so flakey.

    go on everyone take a pop at me, i don’t care anymore but moggy’s point is well made and exactly what i have been saying all along….. as a reminder…….[B]”But lottery money meant for good causes has been wasted on keeping Marshalls profitable and some self-serving Vulcan fanatics in (presumably) gainful employment for the last few years.”

    I very ragerly agree with moggy but i do this time

    here is what to do…….take an estimate and then double it in cost and time…….for example, Beech 18, estimated 5 years and here we are in year 11, estimated £25,000 now about £50,000

    stahlhelm on ready for the flak heading my way

    in reply to: Cockpit Ownership Your Questions Answered #1339449
    philip turland
    Participant

    I have been there and done it with a very large cockpit section………….if you want to take it around to shows and stuff, it becomes a real ball ache……….even moving a few yards it is a problem.

    Big, Heavy, expensive, tiring, money pit………… would never do it again and i would say that working on a real aircraft is more satisfying.

    in reply to: Cockpit Ownership Your Questions Answered #1339455
    philip turland
    Participant

    I’m not a cockpit owner (other than being a member of MAM!) but would like to pose a question. What can/do cockpit owners/restorers do about the many tiny explosive devices often installed in ex-military cockpits?

    I went to a BAPC “Stopping The Rot” seminar many years ago and was amazed when one of the speakers (H&S ??) talked about this and said something like “the Canberra cockpit, for example, has ** minute explosive devices in it”. ** was 50+ or 150+ – I wish I could remember the figure.

    Can anyone comment?

    Roger Smith.

    I believe he was reffering to the explosive bolts holding the canopy onto the fuselage.

    these would most certainly have been disarmed before the cockpit was salvaged and sold off.

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe in Winter #1340224
    philip turland
    Participant

    not many of us about when it is snowing.

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe in Winter #1340229
    philip turland
    Participant

    here we go

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe in Winter #1340247
    philip turland
    Participant

    Thanks mate, i knew you couldn’t miss them out

    i have a couple of pics i will post later…………. I need to resize them first

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe in Winter #1340643
    philip turland
    Participant

    that’s what’s missing…………..mind you, TT would argue that point, you know him and his T-6 obsession

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe in Winter #1340743
    philip turland
    Participant

    still one particular aircraft not covered yet Andy…………… and TT i do not mean what you think i mean……….if you know what i mean, know what i mean?

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe in Winter #1340897
    philip turland
    Participant

    I do hope there is a picture of a certain aircraft about to appear

    go on, i know you want to

    in reply to: german fighter in the movie sahara (1943) #1341635
    philip turland
    Participant

    off the top of my head – Lulubelle

    but I’ve been wrong before

    Isn’t the M3 Lee used in the remake now in the Canadian War Museum’s new building?

    yep, you got it

    in reply to: german fighter in the movie sahara (1943) #1342047
    philip turland
    Participant

    I always did enjoy that film

    liked the opening scenes where they are getting shelled…… It is out on DVD

    a bit of a test, what was the name of the tank?

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe's Jaguar GR.1 #1353577
    philip turland
    Participant

    I have just got to add my two pennies to this thread,
    I know its not the correct colour, but hay, someone has taken time out to take it apart, clean it and paint it, it will give it a few more years, all these things come down to time and money and someone has put their hand in their pocket and spent some money.
    Bruntingthorpe is first and foremost an automotive site, without this bussiness we the owners of all these lovely old jets that we keep in running condition for all to come and enjoy out of our own pockets, wouldnt have a free home that we treat as our own, and all our money would go on ground rentals, with nothing left for insurance and fuel.
    I assume the Waltons might have a big Jaguar event/contract and gave it a lick of paint for the customer, it was badly in need of some TLC.
    I say well done

    Andy B (LPG)

    I agree Andy

    we do sometimes take for granted the kindness offered by the Walton family……….. others don’t realise.

    Dave actually spent £10,000 on getting it stripped, filled and painted!!

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe's Jaguar GR.1 #1358631
    philip turland
    Participant

    the wing is off so it would fit in the spray booth……………..

    the booth is designed for 40′ trucks not aircraft

    in reply to: forum member baby alert #1369157
    philip turland
    Participant

    thanks everybody for your “kind” words

    mum and baby doing fine thanks……. she is wonderful and so is the little lad……. both are the best thing that ever happened to me………

    forum members welcome to see both of them at brunters later in the year

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 622 total)