dark light

kevinwm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 921 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: You can't hide away today Bmused55 #487576
    kevinwm
    Participant

    Happy birthday and best wishes for the day

    in reply to: request glasgow lads #494158
    kevinwm
    Participant

    Bad news both are departing tonight after dark ,first one due out at 2130 and the second one due out 2200, still no news about the third one as of yet

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #489754
    kevinwm
    Participant

    Sandy you are correct
    How can a company change its working practices when it is being held to ransom by a Union that will not
    Bassa had 2 years to get a deal with BA and refused to come to the table , they bullied non striking members with drew labour and then tried to bring other unions outside the UK into the dispute
    Their cause was and is on a shaky leg ,look how many time BA took them to court and won making any strike Illegal ,BA is well with in their rights to sack those who striked but haven’t they cant strike on the original cause any more due to Bassa failing to negotiate (They seem to like to dictate) with in the 12 week period so now they are trying again using the removal of Non contractual benefits
    CC signed a contract which states Travel benefits are non contractual are Non Negotiable and can be removed at any time , they signed it and they knew what could happen

    Sound like Bulling to me but not from BA

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #490232
    kevinwm
    Participant

    I have to agree with a lot of what you say ,I think in BA position its about economics and who runs the airline ,but the Unions have turned it into a power struggle. If it was about pure economic then I think this dispute would have been over a long time ago
    It might of started of with BA wanting to cut its operating cost ,but the unions have dragged it out
    Unite and Bassa had agreed to the BA management changes in CC working practices at Gatwick over 2 Plus years ago , with out any noises being made ,yet when theses same practices were introduce at LHR we get as strike organised by the same unions who were seen to roll over at Gatwick question is why? what had changed ,there was no change in CC contracts just working practices which would have covered by their existing Contracts
    Now we are in a position were the Union are striking for Non contractual Perks Unite were willing to accept the last offer from BA which would see some restoration of travel perks But Bassa were not willing to accept that so unite decide not put the proposal to its members
    To me that sounds more of a power struggle between BA and Bassa with Unite stuck piggy in the middle

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #490240
    kevinwm
    Participant

    I can’t believe we’re hear again either, but since we are. I really cannot believe that this dispute has still not been resolved. Certainly since the last time I posted, the overall economic situation in the country has got worse, despite the propaganda peddled by “The Ministry of Truth” this is irrefutable. Yet against this background, people are still prepared to countenance industrial action.

    I honestly, and without malice aforethought, would like someone better informed than I, to please illustrate the justification, and the motivation behind, the actions of the individuals pushing for possible industrial action. My own opinion is that for some reason, the union leaders and its members still appear to be blind to todays economic reality. I know I’ve mentioned this before, but I just don’t get it. I find it incredible that these union leaders and their members, who must, like the rest of us, see and hear almost on a daily basis about the seemingly constant stream of redundancies and company closures, can even consider industrial action at this time.

    Its not about economics its a power battle, the Unions want to Run BA like they have in the past ,pure and simply and the BA Management aren’t going to let them

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #490431
    kevinwm
    Participant

    So, not only do you quote a figure that is not even represented in the link that you’re quoting from, but then you have the cheek to expect me to go off to find out what it represents, and where the figure originally comes from…seriously, please tell me you’re joking…!?:D

    Sorry but you asked and I told you were the figure came from and if you cant be bothered to check them then that’s you’re problem not mine
    What about you’re sources? You shout and demand that other show their sources and links what about you ? pot kettle black me thinks

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #490444
    kevinwm
    Participant

    I’d rather edit my posts to show only figures that have been directly quoted from sources that I provide in my original post, and am not reminded to have to provide one?

    The reason for editing my post was because I was, and still am, confused about where the 14,000 figure came from; no mention of it in the source you provided, thats all?

    14500 was the cabin crew membership quoted by BASSA Last Year ,it was on their website ,If you Looked

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #490451
    kevinwm
    Participant

    Maybe you should research you’re facts before posting them ,Like I do and I don’t have to edit my post to suite

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #490455
    kevinwm
    Participant

    well well even unite agree with me
    http://www.unitetheunion.org/news__events/latest_news/ba_vote_shows_cabin_crew_remai.aspx

    They only polled 70% of the 14000 members

    apology accepeted:diablo:

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #490462
    kevinwm
    Participant

    I think it’s high time those that voted yes are quickly dismissed and those standing in the dole queue are given the chance to work.

    couldn’t agree with you more Sandy

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #490464
    kevinwm
    Participant

    Yet again some one get,s their sums wrong out of 14,000 member’s only 7,000 voted and 6,000 decide they want to strike that leaves 8,000 who don’t, that’s 58% of staff who want to work

    Think that speaks for it self :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    in reply to: Ma take on G-VSXY at Glasgow #495994
    kevinwm
    Participant

    Thanks guys for the comments

    in reply to: EDI arrivals? #492331
    kevinwm
    Participant

    Yes NJE is Netjets Europe
    Thats Unusual as these biz jet flights don’t normally show up on flight schedules as they aren’t scheduled flights,

    in reply to: Seems a like a rash of new orders for Boeing #494613
    kevinwm
    Participant

    The BA T7-300ERs are in lieu of the b787, as we were told sweeteners to keep the BA 787 orders

    in reply to: Heads up for GLA – bmi Astraeus 757 coming! #505664
    kevinwm
    Participant

    well it never did turn up

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 921 total)