i good plane for a third world counrty that doesnt need too much operating cost but east to maintain and can carry resonable weapons beaucse ull be just facing maybe mig 21s and mig 15s and 17s but 1in 30 countries a mig 29 it would good for them to purchase a l-39 or l-139s or l-159s. Id go for the l-39 they cost as much as a mig 21.

well it is currently most expensive jet fighter but it proboly will be worth its stealth and the only much of planes american has that are stealth is b-2 and f-117a and they all need esocrts you can do a lot better job with a f-22 the with a b-2 and this f-22 can drop bombs also so i reckon its pretty good for the cash then paying for a b-2 2billion dollars.

i would choose russia beacuse Russia has proboly better pilots then the other ones and instuctors.

well thats what i heard from the goverment but i forgot to add something about it they wrote down they are going to purchuse or lease its for sure going to be a lease.

well they said when they retire the mig 21s and the j-22s they are going to buy the new Su-30 PK i think about 30 of them or something or just one secodroun but i heard also they might also buy some more chopper i think a few mi-24V hinds and a An-72 trasport or 2 An-72s. Beacuse they are in despreate need of more trasnport for the border and stuff.

yeah no point of the Mig AT and hopefully for the kuwait upgrade to our m-84s and maybe the goverment could put a bit extra in but i was just wondering if it could help but its better if we dont beacuse maybe better when it is less aircraft and we would have less running costs and that means more flight hours but id like to see if serbia accuries something that is 2 seater.

You will be surpirsed who many aircraft can land on rough fields, and I would be interested to hear how a “rough” field is defined. However, what does it gain to land somewhere in the “open” if nobody awaits you with fuel, weapons and line maintenance. No country could afford to have movable maintenance units like the Russians surely had. The “rough-field” ability is therefore useless weight.
Better look for good field performance and low approach speed as it will save you lots of accidents. The MiG-21 is not really famous for that.

A slower and less “tuned” aircraft will have the range to operate from normal airstrips. The A-4 and the A-7 were carrier aircraft. I think they had low approach speed and were pretty tough.

yeah your right the i dont know about the A-4 but the A-7 Corssiar is a good choice its not super sonic its tough dough and in Africa there has been a lot of civial wars and you would need something that is for ground capabilty and the A-7 would be for that

I like the Mig 21 F-13 on display inside the Museam it looks really nice.