Yes ! yes! yes! – and with the “Hells Angels” sequence from “Aviator” plus the airship attack sequence from “Zeppelin” poached for good measure.
“Pearl Harbor ” meets “Aces High”
In a ‘jetstream’ an ordinary jetliner can reach Mach 1 nearly (TAS).
🙂 Somebody tell him.
Certainly the CV 990 was claimed in the ’60’s to be the fastest airliner in service.
That’s an easy question to answer. It’s called “hype”. It’s the standard codswallop that is published just prior to a film’s release to make you want to go and see it. It’s very effctive. I bet I won’t be the only one going to see it.
……..and like most such prattle totally unoriginal in concept. Thinking of the long-winged bomber at a certain U.K. Museum which was looking for a bit of publicity some years ago….
There was ‘The Iron Maiden’ that looked remarkably similar to a Victor B2 😀 :diablo:
Regards,
Dan
p.s. people who have seen the film of the same name will know what I mean 😉
I do ! Some wonderful quotes.
“Please take that piece of Detroit tin out of here”
On watching same individual driving off and knocking down a stream of parking cones. ” Hey , you missed one!”
And my favourite, when our hero gets home from his beloved traction engine
“Mums looking for you!”
Thank you for brightening up my evening. 🙂
P.S. Roy Castle R.I.P.
Hopelessly
The Hind and Sea Hurricane and both in serfectly accurate markings, so why buck the trend by a lack of research? 🙁
I would have thought that “research” would have made even you realise that modern materials and finishes only approximate the full spectral and reflectivity signatures of those used at the time.
Courtesy of “Albert Ross”
Courtesy of “Albert Ross”
[QUOTE=ALBERT ROSS]…that’s IT..hat? coat
Sorry , did you say that you advised on colour schemes?
For someone who’s been supposedly involved in aviation for such a long time, you don’t seem to have learned much.
I’d have thought that keeping an aircraft in the air when it needed fairly substantial reworking was preferable to spending available money on painting an aircraft that may not be to everyone’s taste but is still perfectly servicable.
When the Gladiator reaches the point of needing substantial maintenance, then it’ll go through the same process.I think you might find that the SE5A is next in line–or would you rather see that grounded for a bit longer so available funds can be spent splashing a bit of paint about?
Or do think that all old aircraft involve are pretty paint schemes?
A.
PS Yak 11 Fan–you kit the post key slightly ahead of me.
Surely to be fair , being involved in aviation means working with the design, construction or operation of aircraft. You can’t realistically expect this to include helping run a Toyshop.
Interesting, what other types ‘spawned’ such a family?
The Manchester springs to mind first – leading to Lancaster > York > Lincoln > Shackleton.
Roger Smith.
To be very pedantic, I think that the York and Lancaster were actually parallel design exercises.
By stretching it a bit though , one could also put in the A.W. Argosy as having the main structure of a Shackleton wing. As for the Tudor with its basic Lincoln wing?
Some would argue that the B.E.2 spawned virtually all tractor biplanes, including the Tiger Moth ,by extrapolation.
Like most arguments it depends how you define your parameters e.g. does the Brit/Argus/Yukon/CL44 line include the Belfast?
Spitfire, Spiteful/ Seafang -Attacker?
An interesting line of discussion I would think.
I’m not a “markings” person as so many oddities and varieties appeared on operational service aircraft as to make it a bit of a tossers’ mizmaze . For what its worth and without checking on where the Potez 25’s actually ended up:
Yes, Brazilian markings of the period appear to have had a green outer ring, then yellow(Gold?) and blue centre. Fin flash ,from the front, Blue, Gold ,Green
The diagonal striped roundel seems to be a Uruguayan variation.
Post-war Yugoslav markings are as described above but I don’t see the fin flash on the sheet. Chile and Panama (and China!) amongst others included five pointed stars in their roundels pre-war but it doesn’t look like that is what we are looking at. That is of course presuming that it is a national marking.
Peter Farrar’s collection was featured in the modelling press in the 1960’s. He worked in 1/72 and had a couple of rooms full of shelves in his home which AFAIK was in the home counties.