dark light

25deg south

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 662 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Old Warden's Westland Wallace Replica #1222820
    25deg south
    Participant

    I recall meeting a guy in the mid 80’s who was working on a film script for a “fictionalised” account of the flight over Everest ( lots of lurv interest etc.)
    I think this may well be linked as flying replicas were mooted.

    in reply to: Fairey Rotodyne #1237200
    25deg south
    Participant

    Ther were high hopes in North America as well.
    Kaman had a license to sell (and perhaps produce) them in N.A. and had a tentative order from New York Helicopter airways.

    “Okanagan” were also in the frame IIRC

    in reply to: Fairey Rotodyne #1237679
    25deg south
    Participant

    The Rotodyne wasn’t of course by definition a helicopter.
    The noise from the tip jets was however horrific when it was in vertical flight and this didn’t help it’s case, although this problem was allegedly close to some sort of a solution.
    I would suspect the real reasons for it’s demise lie more with the forced political integration of rotary wing aviation under “Wastelands” and the subsequent rationalisation of the sector ; resulting in the Westminster also being chopped and its remains dumped in a quarry. The sad remnants of the Rotodyne lingered for many years at Cranfield post dismemberment of the aircraft -it certainly seemed to have had no friends at the company headquarters in Yeovil!
    One looks to Groen Brothers in Utah to see what might yet still be possible with the Rotodyne concept.

    25deg south
    Participant

    Not a touch on “Garry Halliday”:)

    25deg south
    Participant

    If you look at the clip from You Tube I posted above you will find that the Roy Marsden character was flying for the RAF Transport Command in the first episode.

    No, I’m happy to take your word for it.;)

    25deg south
    Participant

    With all that planning how come the mock up on the roof was in military markings? ( Continuity girl’s day off?)

    in reply to: Granger Archaeopteryx #1174952
    25deg south
    Participant

    I refer you to Aeroplane Monthly of Nov 78. Again there referring to “From Bleriot to Spitfire” Lewis regards the A.
    ” as a handful to fly from O.W. and, in keeping with most tailless aircraft it has some bad habits. Much of the trouble stems from the u/c and short moment of the fuselage…………..”
    As expected it was also very underpowered with a climb rate of 60 fpm.:eek:

    in reply to: Airborne Aircraft Carriers #1175864
    25deg south
    Participant

    His Majesty’s Airship 23 (later R23 ) dropped Camels in 1918.

    in reply to: Competition – Name the types. #1178418
    25deg south
    Participant

    ..the “Belvedere” is a Bristol 173

    in reply to: Gemini mystery photo. #1180403
    25deg south
    Participant

    I think Mondariz is on the right track.
    Look carefully at that registration on the further aircraft. The letters post the “A” are of a slightly smaller size (look along the lower lettering line ) and also don’t line up properly in the vertical or horizontal fuselage axes.

    in reply to: Identifying This Wreck #1185810
    25deg south
    Participant

    (I am not aware of any complete survivors or major components?)

    IIRC I saw some Siskin III upper wings somewhere -in the RAF Museum?

    in reply to: Blue Angels #1194973
    25deg south
    Participant

    Saw them at Yeovilton in the 60’s flying Grumman Tigers with a 2 seat Cougar as a hack .

    in reply to: Coming sooner than one thinks: invisible aircraft #2464418
    25deg south
    Participant

    This concept goes back at least to WW2. A test Liberator with underwing luminescence (to minimise information from shadows) was able to stay undetected down to about 3nm distance IIRC.
    More recent land based experiments – illuminating the lower sides of vehicles, again removing shadow, have given encouraging results for many years.
    Not new, but a new twist on a fairly well known approach to camouflage technique which may already be in use in some programmes.

    in reply to: RAF Chipmunk Livery Question #1203383
    25deg south
    Participant

    One never forgets a serial!

    Ref I.Garey’s comments on Oxford UAS Chipmunk WD345.
    We had her on ULAS (i.e.London UAS) late 60’s early 70’s.First flew her 7/2/70
    Last 21/09/72. She was in the basic scheme as on the first post.
    Happy Days!!!

    in reply to: Question concerning pod #2468225
    25deg south
    Participant

    It’s the EMI Multisensor Recce Pod. It was just over 22ft long and weighed about 2,500lbs. It was Non-jettisonable incidentally.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 662 total)