dark light

Taygibay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 639 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2338882
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Either it was my poor piloting skills or the EF really sucks :diablo:

    BOTH?:D

    Seriously, Nic, you’re on a roll!
    Lovely series of tongue-in-cheek posts lately!
    Two thumbs up and keep on trucking, mate!:)

    @Mrmalaya
    Do remember that the smart bombs, atmospheric
    conditions non-withstanding, are as “bright” as their
    launching platform! In that respect, even the most
    steadfast “Raf’fan” will acknowledge that you simply
    cannot compare the efficiency of of patrol of Phoons
    over that of a squadron of Blenheims save probably
    the Lancaster but that’s unfair since I’m a fanboy of
    them too! :):D:p

    http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/50.jpg

    Good day N/D, Tay.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2338896
    Taygibay
    Participant

    I’m not going o judge about better or worse here as such, but these endless claims of the “oh so much more developed Rafale and no upgrades for Typhoon brabbling” is somewhat delusional!

    Scorpion, maybe the impression comes from this :
    The Rafale is following a rather linear upgrade path
    on account of being block-less first and by virtue of
    having one govt/AF deciding freely. Wheareas the
    Typhoon is “torn apart” between consortium upgrades
    and national ones?

    That alone may give some the idea that one does fine
    while the other suffers! Actually it seems to me that the
    UK is pulling the EF train almost alone. So does France
    but pulling one wagon not four hence the difference.

    @ Ero-Senin
    Mostly agreed but it still gives one an idea. Besides, it’s
    not like the DGA is gonna come and publish real docs on
    KeyPub, right?

    Good day all, Tay.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2339713
    Taygibay
    Participant

    ^^^^^^^2013 t0 2017 but I’ll look for most recent info.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2339727
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Merci T’Mor!

    @Buitreaux
    Dassault would not like to have to create two new
    stations to replace those lost at wingtip!
    As TooCool12F pointed out, the “mast” that is the tail
    is carbon composite and finenesse made plane and…
    the box is EW located to complement the 360 degrees
    coverage or about as here :
    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1210/1368332779_1c36d41a81_b.jpg

    Anyway, the stealth future of the Rafale may be :
    http://avion.microsiervos.com/images/DassaultRafaleNeuron.jpg

    Also, do protect your work or follow-up on it
    by making sure credit is preserved or contacting
    the posters!

    Oh! And thinking of Nicolas’ cute jest with a zest o’ truth,
    who said the Rafale had a small nose? :
    http://astrosurf.com/astrogazeran/images/Rafale%202%20FP.jpg

    Good night gang, Tay.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2340315
    Taygibay
    Participant

    I think someone asked for this :
    http://img273.imageshack.us/img273/6829/spectra0cp.jpg

    Good day all, Tay.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2340500
    Taygibay
    Participant

    I know where the mix-up comes from guys.

    Scorpion, for Kovy and I there have long existed two timetables!
    One projection with exports and one without.
    The second came to order as the first failed to materialize.
    But IF both brazil and
    India were won, trust our govt to slow things back down
    as much as can be!
    So there could have been a gap if exports allowed French
    orders to be delayed by say 16 months.
    See what I mean?

    Good night all, Tay.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2340553
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Thanks for showing those, Buitreaux, nice work.
    Had seen one or two in E-Brazil but did not remember
    where!

    The intakes re-shaping would go with 90kN
    which is the value from Snecma but how much…

    Thanks C-Seven for finding that vid :

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2341119
    Taygibay
    Participant

    ^^^^^To raking export sales?
    HUH! more money?
    🙁

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread IV #2341294
    Taygibay
    Participant

    These stupid “it’s redundant the Typhoon won’t get it brabbling” appears to be Rafale fan’s wishful thinking, that’s at least the impression I get here.

    By that impression, I’m not a Rafale fan.:eek:

    Because I do think that the Typhoon will have those
    or many of those capacities and weapons type added.
    If only for the very simple reason that it already is
    getting stuff from Tonkas’ retirement?
    So that clearly it is the platform that can bridge the
    gaps when needed.

    However this may not always include a seamless line
    of add-ons as other factors come into play.
    For instance, having to use the said Tornado for Meteor
    integration as no Phoon was available? Or money?
    Some may yet be available on a pre-existing platform
    able to last or deemed sufficient cutting the need short!

    But overall, weapons choice will grow, of course!

    Good night all, Tay.

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2341304
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Edited as double posting! Sorry!

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2341307
    Taygibay
    Participant

    ^^^^^ The people had nothing to do with it, mate!
    Them bloody i.io.s at govt, though…
    The sales were as you guessed taken into account
    in setting production line output rates!
    So that extra money had to be injected to keep the
    promise made to Dassault not to drop below 11 planes
    out of normal 33-36 yearly. Just tells you how old the
    problem is that Dassault got that guaranteed way back!
    Our guys flying are happy however, getting a small dozen
    instead of a few per year!

    @mrmalaya
    That is the only pic that has any semblance of what you
    are looking for :
    http://www.hitechweb.genezis.eu/stealth4f.files/stealthy_rafale.jpg

    A nice guy on A-D made a good job of drawing his version
    but that’s it! Others are close to farcical.

    I had this though which may help each think his own up :
    http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/3733/rafalevsf35aey6.jpg

    Good apposition, eagle1, which path will be chosen…
    or a little of both?

    Good night gang, Tay.

    in reply to: Air Ops Over Libya (Part Deux) #2342192
    Taygibay
    Participant

    @mrmalaya
    Since the last SDR, Franco-British missiles
    have become the main focus of cooperation.
    Future light anti-ship missile in planning.
    Brimstone as added capability on the Raffy.
    Dassault & BAe joint venture offer to make
    the Mantis ( with Brimstones? ) a reality, etc.

    @H_K

    I used to be French Cavalry Scouting Sgt.
    My guys would have shown brawn!
    Darn “pool-side rats” aviators! :o:o:o:o;)

    @ bgnewf
    254 sorties for 8 planes?

    Not too shabby!:)

    ( I live in Qc/QC BTW!;) )

    @DrPepper
    Refugees trying to exit/Daffy’s troops
    trying to prevent/Tunisians being alert.
    —end of transmission.

    @Nicolas10
    Right on!/Darn right!/Parfaitement d’accord!
    Tu choisis.

    @Sanem
    What do you think of the AMCA models we’ve
    seen so far? The TEJAS is a great plane but as
    I discussed with Boom, I believe it to be mostly
    a “sketch”! AMCA will be India’s real first plane.

    @Flying-A
    The Nimrod’s cut was my personal heart-breaking
    moment in the last SDR.
    Get the Raffy for RN’s CVs, spend the “saved” cash
    on saving our old buddy and basta!
    Then share a warm/cold one over the F-35 swamp
    and fight together hence.

    Let’s roam the seas “de conserve” as we used to do
    as enemies!

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2342201
    Taygibay
    Participant

    That flight of Alouettes was is jolly sight!
    Thanks Ray!

    What a machine! A flying tractor!
    An antiquated flying tractor!

    Here’s to the Als, Seakings and
    others, pulling their own weight
    and then some after duty call is
    done!
    http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2010/5/19/129187886551646830.jpg

    Good night all, Tay.

    Hello, Boom, joined you here and on BR!

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2342239
    Taygibay
    Participant

    :DYou earned it Vishal.

    I really appreciate for instance your pic 102,
    showing the marvelous fineness of the wings
    tail and canards on the Rafale*.
    That too helps with reduced RCS.

    @mrmalaya
    Of course we still talk to you mate!:D

    The Rafale was the first plane made in France
    that had set numbers concerning RCS reduction.
    It does not mean that it gets “Klingonized” **;
    it does not mean previous planes were unstealthy;
    it does not mean that its discretion is all in the cell.

    It does mean that the Rafale was conceived with stealth
    caracteristics from the onset.

    In the MMRCA thread, you talked about “the RAM paint
    peeling off” for instance. Go back to the pic you had in mind.
    You will find that it is RAM material, not paint.
    That cannot be “added” or not easily!

    Check :

    Minimising the radar cross section has also been a design driver in order to make stealth tactics possible. Most of the stealth design features are classified, but some of them are clearly visible, such as the serrated patterns on the trailing edges of the wings and canards.

    from here :
    http://www.dassault-aviation.com/en/defense/rafale/optimized-airframe.html?L=1

    Good day all, Tay.

    * I was about to write my Rafale but it may soon be yours too!:D

    ** As the invisibility shields in Star Trek!;)

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2342991
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Thanks Vishal!
    Great job! As usual!

    Love those dev/IOC pics of Tejas too!;)

    Keep it up!

    Tay.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 639 total)