:)First of all, swerve , I sincerely think that you should re-read
from my post of the text to my last anf Kovy’s^^^.
You are painting a very impressionist picture of things.
As Kovy just wrote, the short and medium missiles of choice
in the French AdlA and Aéronavale is the MICA.
It should see a replacement in 2020-25.
That will only happen on a national basis if we start the program soon.
Otherwise, we would end up having to buy American.
Don’t worry about Meteor which will be integrated and bought.
Just keep calm and wait with us.
As is, things are hinged on that piece up there but not solely.
As mentioned earlier, this may become a coop job with the UK.
Or it may become a coop job elsewhere.
Or it may stay national.fr, quite simply.
We’ll keep you posted if any political mumble jumble chatter
even menaces to turn into reality, promise!
This being said, I wasn,t accusing you of anything, just making a note
that Mica replacement was a valid subject apart from Meteor,:) .
Good day all, Tay.
P.S. Exercises in same thing expressed differently :
medium range BVR missile/
shorter range IR-guided European missile ( shorter then Meteor range )/
very short to BVR air interdiction.
and :
MICA stands for “Missile d’Interception, de Combat et d’Autodéfense”. A clear statement that this single missile system had to cover all facets of the air-to-air battle – BVR (Beyond Visual Range) intercept, dogfight and self-defence.
from the maker’s site.
With range specs :
Range
from < 500 m to > 60 km
@swerve
That’s odd. Why would France have to buy something off the shelf from the USA? What about Meteor (made by MBDA), supplemented by a shorter range IR-guided European missile? France has already budgeted money for Meteor integration on Rafale.
Two things here mate!
First, Meteor would not be able to replace MICA.
By the simple virtue of the fact that it is build according to very
different set of specifications. The Meteor does fast and far air interdiction.
The MICA does very short to BVR air interdiction.
According to your plan, France would have Rafale with no short range missile.
That is the one type that could have to be bought States-side.
And as we write that we come across our second point, which is
that France’s political system includes “liaison men” between the armed
forces ( mainly through the DGA [ Armament General Direction ] ) and
government as in Assemblée Nationale of which that was a transcript.
One of those or a deputy benevolent to the cause of the military will
often rings bells and sirens as a way to accelerate things and/or wake
up the back benchers.
The problem here is that MICA is not directly or solely linked to the
Rafale program and as such has not been included in the PEAs, the
“Upstream Studies Plan” combo maintaining innovation concerning
the Raffys.
Posturing mostly, i’m afraid!
Then, Snow Monkey brought an additional point of value that links
to the recent Brit defence review and the ensuing talks of pursuing
jointly with us the small missile sector through MBDA et al.
So that the MICA’s replacement may stem from there which may
take a while to materialize!
@ Aspis
Here you are with that ref. I promised you :
Malgré l’absence de contrats à l’export du Rafale qui constitueraient un levier promotionnel, le missile MICA a déjà été exporté vers plusieurs pays dont Taïwan, le Qatar, les Émirats arabes unis, la Grèce, le Maroc et Oman.
La question du successeur au MICA se pose dès aujourd’hui car son obsolescence sera définitive entre 2020 et 2025, selon les versions considérées. Un tel programme exige environ dix ans de développement avant d’être intégré sur les plateformes des forces aériennes. La LPM n’a pourtant pas envisagé le lancement d’études en ce sens. Les industriels ne peuvent s’engager sur leurs seuls fonds propres sur un tel programme sans intention ferme du ministère. Des décisions devront cependant être rapidement prises, sous peine de devoir acheter sur étagère américaine le prochain missile air-air en 2020.
“Even though the Rafale did not get export contracts yet to promote it,
the MICA has already been exported to many countries including :
Taïwan, Qatar, the U.A.E., Greece, Morocco and Oman.
The question of a successor to the MICA is asked today as its obsolescence
will be definitive around 2020-2025 depending on the version considered.
Such a program requires about ten years of development before its
integration on aerial platforms. The PLM [ Military Programming Law ]
has not yet concerned itself with launching studies yet. The industry can’t
engage the program on their own without a strong intent from the MinDef*
Decisions shall nonetheless be taken quickly in order not to be forced to
buy an off-the-shelf American missile in 2020.”
From : http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/budget/plf2011/a2862-tVII.asp#P5747_828551
So maybe you could whisper to someone in charge over in Greece that
they should push for participation now and get a nice cut!
Good day all, Tay.
P.S. @Marcelosg
Have you ever noticed how that pic shows a Typhoon actually?
Oh, and while I’m at it, shouldn’t it be Marcelo_ng? ::rolleyes:
Yes, USS that source is valid. I gave a trans of it in the MMRCA thread.
#805
9th November 2010, 12:32Taygibay
Rank 3 Registered UserJoin Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 373
@Scorpion82
Omnirole fighter, of course mate!For the following posts, please re-read this :
Quote:
Lequel SPECTRA a aussi été capable, à deux reprises, de détecter et de classifier – puis de proposer au pilote des modifications de trajectoire pour éviter leur enveloppe spécifique de détection – some ground to air systems ( SA-6 ) que même les F-16 CJ américains spécialisés dans la mission SEAD, pourtant également en vol à ces occasions, n’étaient pas parvenus à percevoir. Certes, les F-16 CJ en question n’avaient pas été équipés, lors de ces vols, de leurs équipements SEAD usuels, à savoir la nacelle HTS ( HARM Targeting System ), tandis que leur bibliothèque de menaces n’avait pas été rafraîchie pour intégrer certainsradars sol-air de la zone. La SEAD n’était pas leur mission du jour.
Mais ça ne l’était pas non plus pour les Rafale. Et pourtant, leur SPECTRA, sans autres équipements que ceux du bord emportés au quotidien, a fait mieux que les F16 CJ qui, à la base, sont pourtant spécialisés dans la mission SEAD. C’est toute la différence entre le multirôle qui nécessite de revenir se poser sur sa base pour basculer d’un type de mission à l’autre et la polyvalence qui permet d’opérer en vol en même temps dans les différents rôles.
Tay trans :
Quote:
Which SPECTRA was also able, on two occasions, to detect and classify – and to propose to the pilot trajectory modifications to avoid their specific detection envelope – some Ground to Air systems ( SA-6 ) that even the American F-16 CJs specialised in SEAD missions, also flying on those outings, had not been able to find. Admittedly, the said F-16 CJs were not equipped, during these flights, with their usual SEAD systems, to wit the HTS pod ( HARM Targeting Systems ), while their menace library hadn’t been refreshed to incorporate some anti-aircraft radars found in the area. SEAD was not their mision that day.
But neither was it the Rafale’s. And yet their SPECTRA, without any other equipment than those always carried on-board, did better than tghe F-16 CJ whom, basically, are SEAD specialized.
It is the whole difference between the multirole that needs to come back to base and land to switch from one type of mission to another and polyvalence [ omnirole ] that allows one to operate in-flight at the same time in all the different mission types.
DSI, Défense & Sécurité internationale, #59_may 2010, p.98
http://www.dsi-presse.com
The source is DSI, a French mag of worth.
Aspis, I’ll find the Franco-french equivalent to that tomorrow.
For now, “Close your eyes… and sleep tight…” LOL.
Good night all, Tay.
LOL! RÀGD! 😀
I am deeply sorry for the translation omission, USS.
La précision de localisation angulaire de SPECTRA permet aujourd’hui de positionner correctement des menaces au sol afin de les éviter ou de les désigner au tir.
“The angular localisation precision of SPECTRA aloows today
to properly locate ground menaces as to evade or target them.”
It’s from a 2006 doc from Dassault concerning Eurosatory.
VII PERFORMANCES ET CARACTÉRISTIQUES
Dimensions :
Envergure 10,80 m (35.4 ft)
Surface alaire 45,70 m² (492 sq ft)
Longueur 15,27 m (33.8 ft)
Hauteur 5,34 m (17,4 ft)Poids :
A vide De la classe 10 tonnes
Max 24.500 kg (54,000 lb)
Carburant (interne) 4.700 kg (10,300 lb)
Carburant (externe) 6.800 kg (15,000 lb)
Capacité maximale d’emports externes 9.500 kg (20,950 lb)Points d’emport externes 14
Points d’emports pour charges lourdes et carburant 5Facteurs de charge +9g/-3.2g
Vitesse max M 1.8+/750 kts
Vitesse d’approche 120 kts
Distance de roulement à l’atterrissage 450 m (1,475 ft)
Taux de montée plus de 1,000 ft/sec
Plafond opérationnel plus de 55,000 ft
Rayon d’action en mission de pénétration plus de 1.000 NM
Temps de patrouille en défense aérienne plus de trois heuresContacts: Dassault Aviation “Chalet Média” B92
Gérard DAVID, Communication institutionnelle Stand : Hall 2A n°17 – Statique n°10
( : + 33 (0)1 47 11 86 90 Internet : http://www.dassault-aviation.com
Yves ROBINS, Export militaire ( : + 33 (0)1 41 57 45 05
( : + 33 (0)1 47 11 81 37 Fax : + 33 (0)1 41 57 45 08
PAGE 1Contacts: Dassault Aviation “Chalet Presse” B92
Gérard DAVID, Communication institutionnelle Stand Hall 2A n°17 – Statique n°10
( : + 33 (0)1 47 11 86 90 Internet : whttp://www.dassault-aviation.fr
Yves ROBINS, Export militaire ( : + 33 (0)1
( : + 33 (0)1 47 11 81 37 Fax : + 33 (0)1
PAGE 1
That’s the last page for source validation. I could PM it to you
but I’m afraid I don’t have a link.
And do not take every one of my puns as personal, by Jove;
it’s not worth it, just tongue in cheek jesting , I’m afraid, :o.
Tay,
You’re welcome, mec!
I just found this back in my computer’s shed :
IV-3-3 Système d’autoprotection SPECTRA
Développé conjointement par THALES et MBDA, et totalement intégré à l’avion, il lui confère une grande survivabilité face aux menaces air-air et air-sol. Il confère au RAFALE une capacité d’alerte multi-spectrale contre les radars, les missiles et les lasers hostiles. Assurant la détection grande distance, l’identification et la localisation de menaces, il permet au pilote et au système de réagir sans délai de la façon la plus adaptée*: brouillage électromagnétique, leurrage infrarouge, manoeuvre, actions combinées.
La précision de localisation angulaire de SPECTRA permet aujourd’hui de positionner correctement des menaces au sol afin de les éviter ou de les désigner au tir.
Par ses capacités de détection et de localisation précises et lointaines de cibles aériennes, SPECTRA contribue à élaborer une situation tactique précoce.
Pour cela, SPECTRA tire parti d’une bibliothèque de menaces embarquées, définie par les utilisateurs.
In a 2006 Dassault documentation piece while as of now,
we know from Capitaine Romain that making SPECTRA
fully funktional is an ongoing process.
You’d have to be held back by strong belief not to
understand that Air-Air ranging is operational or close to.
You gotta understand the fanboys falling into trolling at times.
It’s like in politics, they better go for it now before it gets known
that we have the best combat plane available! 😀 😮 😉
Good night all, Tay.
:p
P.S. Aspis mate, sorry; I do know what you are talking about
and it is true that plans for an über-MICA are in the (blue)wings.
I’ll come back to you with links later, Tay.
Re.: supercruise
It’s in the Fox Three docs mentioned by Bluewings!
The Rafale is ideal for the job, stresses one of the two duty pilots. It can climb to 40,000 feet in under two minutes and accelerate very rapidly to supersonic speed. More significantly, it can super-cruise in dry power, even with four missiles and a belly drop tank.
It’s the “fast” Air interdiction config, with a belly tank, two
wingtips Mica IR and two rear fuselage MICA EM.
Awarded to Erkokite, honoris French nationality on fora for such a good job,:D.
@ Bluewings
The complete sentence would run thus :
Spectra can’t do range-finding by itself if there are no emissions from target.
@Bluewings
Funded, mon vieux, as in funds!
But otherwise agreed! 😀
@Bluewings
Quote:
But as I pointed out a while back to those guys, it does not work quite as well once those misiles have been fired
??? An IR Mica on its rail or in flight has the same detection range . Why it would be different since the seeker has its own power unit ?
Because once those MICAs have blown away a Mig/Sukhoï/F-something,
they’re not on your wingtips anymore to triangulate the next target?
AAAAAAh, O.K.!:diablo:
@uss novice
Supercruise is given as 1.2 Mach sustained.
Tay.
Now, I’m all confused.
What about this :
En mode air-air et air-surface, le système assure la détection et la poursuite des cibles en deux dimensions, avec une parfaite discrétion. En utilisant la voie laser et le mode télémétrie, la poursuite passe en trois dimensions sur des cibles aérienne, terrestres ou maritimes. Bien qu’il soit limité au secteur frontal de l’avion, l’OSF offre les avantage de la discrétion, d’une capacité de fonctionnement en environnement de brouillage électronique, et d’une grande précision dans les paramètres fournis.
Les modes air-air ou air-surface sont configurés en fonction de la mission prévue de l’avion, mais peuvent être reprogrammés pendant le vol par le pilote.
“In air-to-air and air-to-surface modes, the system insures detection and pursuit in two dimensions in perfect discretion. Using the laser path/tool
and the telemetry mode, tracking becomes three dimensional for aerial, terrestrial and maritime targets. Although limited to the frontal sector of the plane, OSF offers the advantages of discretion, an electronic jamming environment operational capacity and high precision in acquired parameters.
The AotG or AtoA modes are configured according to the planned mission but
can be reprogrammed in-flight by the pilot.”
From Avions-militaires.net.
Unless you are talking about using the wing-tips MICAs as triangulating
sensors, which I have read about on a given French forum.
But as I pointed out a while back to those guys, it does not work quite as
well once those misiles have been fired 😮 :rolleyes: :D!
Rocket scientists, the whole lotta’em, lol.
If on the other hand, you meant can SPECTRA do ranging by exchanging infos about tracks
provided by an accompagnying Rafale, the answer is still yes.
Here is an excerpt from a certain “Serious squall” piece that you may remember :
Spectra EW system, developed by Thales and MBDA, provides a multi-spectral threat warning capability against hostile radars, missiles and lasers. According to test pilots who have flown the Rafale, the EW system provides the aircraft with the highest survivability assets against airborne and ground threats to date. It also provides passive, 360-degree tactical situation awareness.
Considered a fully automatic self-protection system, Spectra provides passive, all-weather reliable, long-range detection, identification and geographical location of threats in the infrared, electromagnectic and electro-optical ranges. It uses short response times and cutting-edge defensive measures based on a combination of jamming, decoying and evasive maneuvers and technologies, such as Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM) for signal processing.
The efficiency of Spectra notably was demonstrated in 2008 at the Red Flag exercise at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, where during all sorties the Rafale escaped SAM missile threats. This followed a successful demonstration at the NATO MACE electronic warfare campaign in Europe.
The angular localization performance of Spectra makes it possible to precisely discover ground threats and to target them for immediate destruction with precision-guided munitions. In this totally passive mode, Spectra is also used as a general awareness and intelligence reporting system.
Instrumental in the Spectra’s performance is a threat library that can be defined, integrated and updated on short notice by users in their own country, allowing agile and continuous enhancement of the aircraft’s protection as operations unfold. Being of modular design, the system is controlled by a dedicated computer with three processors.
Real-time NATO Link 16 tactical data link, allowing encrypted communication with other aircraft as well as with fixed and mobile command and control centers, while providing a source for tactical data onboard.
Thales IFF system yields information on any platform in the battlespace.
http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/issue/cover/Serious-Squall_32315.html
Is that good for you?
It can do ranging, Bluewings, with its integrated laser.
I will try to find the proper link later; am stuck in
analog life probs, lol.
Good day all, Tay.
Before anyone gets too excited unduly, one of the scenarii was
to allow a full attack on the CVG.
The idea was to practice the carrier destruction mission in full.
If any country had the perfect carrier, then it simply could not
train its aircrews in sinking one … unless exercises were made up ….
Good day all, Tay.
@ Colibri
The Hammer formerly known as AASM is to receive one new version
but the work for full SEAD comes from SPECTRA anyway.
In numerous recent posts by French pilots and firms, the fact that they
are still two thirds through getting that complex system up has come out.
As they go along, they find new ways of using its possibilities.
And to think that work is ongoing for a SPECTRA evolution by tranche 5!
French only, sorry!
Good day all, Tay.
Well, if a military aviation sub-forum is not the place to express regrets
at a combat pilot’s death, where should it take place?
As was said by one or two ex-military men as is my case too,
every one in the armed forces of any worth convey this attitude.
If we did not care about ANY life lost, we probably would not even
be serving our country. The basic stance of a sane serviceman is
that he is offering service to his fellow citizens, all of them.
If I did not trust in the helo pilots when I was a ground force
infiltration unit leader, I would not even have included the rescue
zone in my exfiltration plans, right?
The attitude explained by spitfireman is why alfakilo could saunder
in relative calm over darn cold waters strapped to a big blowtorch’n’ammo.
So that yes, Requiescat in pacem to that soldier and thanks for
ever to his family which also gave his life to us for Protection
against an external aggression, a given of western civilization
at the very least since the end of the Middle Ages along with
Justice and Protection against an internal aggression or Police.
Part of a professional soldier’s duty is to accept not to go berzerk,
to fight as loyally as the enemy will allow and sometimes more
and not to endanger civilians more than himself but for extreme duress.
Those high standards are a trickle from the Knights of faith and steel*,
the long Christian heritage of Europe and seven hundred years of philosophy
and while it is understood that they are clearly not shared yet by
every one even in our modern societies, those of us who adhere
to them cannot make the economy.
So again, R.I.P. Jeffrey Haney, thank you!
Good day all, Tay.
P.S. I cycle all year long in Québec, Canada, already 20cm of snow
and sub-zero, thank you and when a cyclist gets killed, we do R.I.P.
on bike fora from everywhere.
* Hardened faith and steel actually.