Added to yesterday’s story :
[UPDATE @10.47AM / 9 NOV] Lockeed-Martin has responded to the assertion in the INDIA TODAY cover story (see above). Here it is in full: “President Obama has expressed India’s and the US’s shared interest in a stable Pakistan, free of terrorist enclaves. We have heard nothing that would suggest the Indian government would eliminate either US competitor from the competition because of US engagement with Pakistan. On the contrary, we are very confident, based on the results of the Field Evaluation Trials, that the F-16IN Super Viper is fully compliant with India’s requirements. The F-16IN incorporates capabilities based upon lessons learned from combat and was the only MMRCA competitor to demonstrate an operational Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar in India, the core of the weapon system. This will be the finest F-16 ever built.”
There, one more contribution to this thread’s real topic!
Good day to all men of good will, Tay.:rolleyes:
P.S. Duh! …and women.
LOL
@Scorpion82
That was not the friend I was referring to but i understand that my
having more than one friend is as confusing to you as “my” plane
having more than one function! Or not having “blocks”.:p
LOL
the lack of arguments and avoidance of the points I put forward shows that there is no need to continue this.
OH, yes, yes, yes!
If yourself were as great as you think, you’d have noticed that
all those nice things that you are saying to me apply equally
well to you as in :
Bis repetita non placent!
@Rhook
But the SEAD Lite was a good example, mate.
No added hardware but a nice F2 Raffy.
BTW, Rafale or Raffy or even SuperFrog the Superbug-eating
but ideally not RAF as that abbreviation is historically British.
The best point so far was made by Spudman WP :
I already said everything which has to be said with the very first post and if you would actually bother to read and understand, rather than defending the undefendable you would have to agree with me.
So that yes, if all goes according to plan back in the States,
The Rafale will not be the only omnirole machine ONCE the
Lighting II is operational! No problem with that.
That’s why it is called TWO…as it came in second in time.
Heck! If ( what a huge if, lol ) the F-35 becomes as good as promised,
it may even best the Raffy; time will tell that too!
As of now, I have analogic life obligations and upon coming back will
discuss only within the MMRCA field in this thread and follow you to
proper grounds of your choosing for the Omnirole duel!
Tay.
@Rhook
Good point!
Multirole: an A/C that can do AtoA and AtoG; The Typhoon for instance.
Swing role : an A/C that can do many mission profiles with changes and even go from one to the other within a single mission. As the F-18F for instance.
Omnirole : an A/C that can do any mission profile and within same mission.
Rafale.
@Scorpion82
I’ll take my friend’s advice and let you go at it.
If yourself were as great as you think, you’d have noticed that
all those nice things that you are saying to me apply equally
well to you as in :
I already said everything which has to be said with the very first post and if you would actually bother to read and understand, rather than defending the undefendable you would have to agree with me.
Allowing one self things that one does not permit others to do is a bad sign.
( No, not you Sign, sorry! ;))
But as far as getting my back to a corner,
I’d have to be facing a real threat for that to be of any importance!
Which is not the case in more ways than one, LOL.
You should send me that through MP so has not to stifle the thread.
Good day all, Tay.
Have you actually anything useful to contribute? Rafale can do see without carrying a pod, great a Tornado ECR or F-22 could do so as well, even an F-16 could do so
Oh, getting unhappy, hot, flustered and personal over the net, are we?
Well, I am sorry to have already “contributed” enough that your blood
pressure rose! I would gladly tell you what I think too, but this is a
discussion forum not the schoolyard!
So the Tornado sees as well as Rafale without a pod? Good!
How many ever landed and took off operationally from a carrier?
So the F-22 can too? Good!
How many offering CAS to the troops?
Even the F-16 could do so? Good!
As well as it does SEAD?
Pffffffff!
Have a good day nonetheless, Tay.
What about a Warthog battling it over the sands with an F-22?:rolleyes:
News, or maybe not, lol.
http://www.aereo.jor.br/2010/11/09/segundo-o-globo-rafale-ja-ganhou/
Rafale still in the lead.
@ J-7 Hotdog
Strange, I was under the impression that the two were different A/Cs.
Like F-18F and F-18G?
Once again Rafale does not have such blocks, hence omni!
Any Rafale, all Rafale”s”!
@ TMor
As I said, some platform may catch up later…
Or they may not, lol.
@Scorpion82
And for the record the F-16CJ isn’t a dedicated SEAD platform, it’s a multirole fighter which can perform the SEAD role if required.
nonsense as stated above.
LOL Exactly!
So the Cj is a multirole as when not SEAD enabled it can’t do it
but Rafale can and as matter of fact did,
as stated above
!
Thank you, that was the best way to put it!
:D:D:D:D:D
Omnirole is being able do do it all;
multirole is believing you can. LMAO
Yes, you can! ROTFL
@Scorpion82
Omnirole fighter, of course mate!
For the following posts, please re-read this :
Quote:
Lequel SPECTRA a aussi été capable, à deux reprises, de détecter et de classifier – puis de proposer au pilote des modifications de trajectoire pour éviter leur enveloppe spécifique de détection – some ground to air systems ( SA-6 ) que même les F-16 CJ américains spécialisés dans la mission SEAD, pourtant également en vol à ces occasions, n’étaient pas parvenus à percevoir. Certes, les F-16 CJ en question n’avaient pas été équipés, lors de ces vols, de leurs équipements SEAD usuels, à savoir la nacelle HTS ( HARM Targeting System ), tandis que leur bibliothèque de menaces n’avait pas été rafraîchie pour intégrer certainsradars sol-air de la zone. La SEAD n’était pas leur mission du jour.
Mais ça ne l’était pas non plus pour les Rafale. Et pourtant, leur SPECTRA, sans autres équipements que ceux du bord emportés au quotidien, a fait mieux que les F16 CJ qui, à la base, sont pourtant spécialisés dans la mission SEAD. C’est toute la différence entre le multirôle qui nécessite de revenir se poser sur sa base pour basculer d’un type de mission à l’autre et la polyvalence qui permet d’opérer en vol en même temps dans les différents rôles.
Tay trans :
Quote:
Which SPECTRA was also able, on two occasions, to detect and classify – and to propose to the pilot trajectory modifications to avoid their specific detection envelope – some Ground to Air systems ( SA-6 ) that even the American F-16 CJs specialised in SEAD missions, also flying on those outings, had not been able to find. Admittedly, the said F-16 CJs were not equipped, during these flights, with their usual SEAD systems, to wit the HTS pod ( HARM Targeting Systems ), while their menace library hadn’t been refreshed to incorporate some anti-aircraft radars found in the area. SEAD was not their mision that day.
But neither was it the Rafale’s. And yet their SPECTRA, without any other equipment than those always carried on-board, did better than tghe F-16 CJ whom, basically, are SEAD specialized.
It is the whole difference between the multirole that needs to come back to base and land to switch from one type of mission to another and polyvalence [ omnirole ] that allows one to operate in-flight at the same time in all the different mission types.
DSI, Défense & Sécurité internationale, #59_may 2010, p.98
http://www.dsi-presse.com
There, that should help clear things up a little!
So yes Nukes, reco, anti-ship, deep-strike, AtoA
and all as is. Any Rafale of the fleet as they are
upgraded as a whole. Sure there are pods, Scorpion82
but as shown above, they add capacities
that the bare Rafale already has!
As a matter of fact, this proves that you do not get it :
As i understand it, omnirole is a word to replace multirole/swingrole,
so it can be either a practical word, to sum up,
or pointless since most if not all fighters built today has it.
But it could possibly also include ability to set yield on french nukes, which would set it apart from other fighters, except perhaps Mirage 2000N.
Obligatory gives a perfectly valid reasoning, alas one that
I already answered when i wrote :
Anything it has to do the Rafale can perform as is and will get much better at it when the equipment piles on. I sometimes wonder if all the “E-noise”
is not a memory blocker of sorts as AdlA is only getting its tools as of say yesterday. The first Rafale NUC squadron came operational this summer
( and examplifies Raffy omnirole as any RafaleB ( 2 seater ) can be equipped
with the nuke “boxes” and thus the Gascogne will be free to engage in non-nuke activities like deep-strikes which was not possible with the
Mirage 2000 N squadrons.
So you see, Obligatory That the same RafaleB can do what the M2KN
does, plus what the M2KD, M2K-5, F-1………
It is nsaid to take about an hour plus to equip them with
the “nuke boxes”* but everything else is already there!
If you guys wanna chat Rafale only, I wonder if I
shouldn’t open a thread to that purpose, something
like : Understanding the “blockless” omnirole Rafale .
Good day all, Tay.
*Specific comm.s to Nuke Command
:rolleyes: Because the Rafale is an obsolete generation 4.5 design. 😀
Nice one! Of course, it is only obsolete when compared to the only
5th in service today, the F-22! Time will tell for the fat piggy bank!:diablo:
:rolleyes: it may not be as advanced as typhoon 😀
Right, not as advanced, only better, LOL.
Us French are so good at revamping old stuff,LMAO.
Good day all nonetheless, Tay.
OOOOOOh! Nicee! Thanks Aspis!
I like the idea of every type finding a place.
I’ve seen many Air Museums, as Le Bourget,
Smithsonian, etc but this is a nice legacy to
Greek children.
Just an example, my dad flew in a T-6 during
the Algerian uprising!
Swell thang!:D
Tay,
Darn, that’s a lot of planes.
Maybe you should open the
World’s Great 1975-2000 Air Museum!:cool:
Bring in foreign currencies and please.
sell the beer, lol.
Awesome assortment, thanks Aspis!
Tay.
If they distribute free beer, no wonder Greece is in dire monetary straits!
They do that in France and seeing our jolly drinking habits,
we’ll have to sell Versailles by morning just to keep on, LOL.:diablo:
Seriously, i don’t think Greece should buy anything costly up to 2020. Single engine aircrafts are the only choice.
Oh! Grrrrrrrrmbl, he said Gripen NG!
I understand Aspis actually.
IF they become available, the dash nines would be great
but if they don’t Greece’s present needs and means sway to Sweden!
Sad!
BTW, Nic, you can give Sarko away all you want but Carla???
You must have a darn pretty wife of your own to suggest such folly!:D
Good night all, Tay.