dark light

Taygibay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 639 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2377903
    Taygibay
    Participant

    ^^^^^^^Agreed! LOL.

    To everyone’s utmost surprise, India may actually come out of
    this saga with a plane buy’n’acquisition!:eek:!
    :p

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2377907
    Taygibay
    Participant

    O.K.! First answers relative to the nEUROn program :

    No, Loke, SAAB is contributing to the general cell, fuselage,
    avionics and fuel system.
    Dassault has Thales listed as taking care of datalink and command link.

    As the different sizes which puzzled Swerve, there is a present day demonstrator of smaller size flying that has recently crept up the net
    on a video. This is more or less the aeromodel version of the real thing
    which is scheduled to take off in a year and a half ( 2012 ).

    It is also clearly specified that the equipment used for this program,
    to the extent of the engine for instance, is to be standard actual stuff.
    There is an engine designed for the nEUROn’s possible successor weapons
    program in French specs and that would be the M-88.

    As for the Rafale-nEUROn combo option, here is the inceptive comment, AFAIK:

    Quant à l’objection de l’UEO de 2004 selon laquelle “le défi majeur consiste à transformer ces robots en êtres autonomes et dotés d’une intelligence artificielle.”[14], dès février 2003, Laurent Chassaing, chef du service analyse des systèmes militaires chez Dassault, estimait que l’UCAV n’a pas vocation à se substituer à l’avion de combat habité, qu’il n’est donc pas nécessaire de lui en faire acquérir toutes les capacités et, surtout, ne pas chercher à le rendre intelligent et créatif. [15] Encore très récemment, Dassault ne cachait pas qu’il verrait bien un nEUROn (ou son successeur) être télépiloté à partir d’un Rafale biplace, une initiative à laquelle Saab n’est toujours pas acquise.

    [As for the UEO 2004 quote that “the main challenge is to transform these
    robots into autonomous beings with an artificial intelligence.” as far back
    as 2003, Laurent Chassaing, Military Systems Analysis Bureau chief, estimated that the UCAV does not have the vocation of replacing the piloted
    combat aircraft, that it is accordingly not necessary to have it acquire all
    the A/C capacities and especially not to try and make it intelligent and creative. Very recently still, Dassault was not hiding that they would easily
    see the nEUROn ( or rather its successor ) be teleoperated from a Rafale twin-seater, an initiative which SAAB does not yet adhere to.]

    This excerpt was taken from Air & Cosmos, #1880, march 2003, p.24

    There it is in a nutshell, let me add the other program partners include
    Alenia with electrical, anemometric and share of IR targeting sytems;
    EADS-CASA for the wings, ground control station and integration of THALES’ STANAG7085 compliant datalink;
    HAI for the rear fuselage, test bench and stealth outtake nozzles;
    RUAG for the wind tunnel activities and weapons carriage.
    Dassault thus kept architecture, conception of the demonstrator and the flight
    system, assembly and tests both static and in-flight.

    I don’t think that I forgot much, Tay.

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2377999
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Ah! Darn right, you are!
    I’ll add that to upcoming search, thnx.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2378002
    Taygibay
    Participant

    I thought so too, Loke but asian fora abound of stories
    about the I.A.F. seeing it almost solely for A-A.
    I know not why.
    The important point is that this guy picked up on something
    that i had outlined over in the aforementioned asian fora,
    linking an “internal” RFP from strategic section to govt with
    a very precise number of planes to an offer from GIE Rafale.

    If that coincidence has any signification :confused:
    then it could influence on the MMRCA choice.
    More to come in the next episode of MMRCA 2010, i guess, LOL!

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2378082
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Found this lying around :

    http://idrw.org/?p=1100

    I do not believe I have to give a short as one or two readers of
    the right persuasion will probably take the flaming ball and run with it, LOL.

    @ Insomnia.Delhi

    Locally produced is sadly not equal to cheaper, these high technology equipments are not like the good old ordinance factories, they require quite an educated crew and the same set-up to manufacture, test and operationalise.

    In case of such weapons (cruise missiles) a local production run of say 500 missiles would be much cheaper ordered from the original manufacturer as that cuts down on setting up complete tooling required for another manufacturing line.

    Sure, got that, brother!
    But if you make a few thousands of them?
    I mean, China’s a BIG country!
    Just picture PAK-fgfAs clearing the sky
    of those ugly Typhoonesque J-10s while
    norias of M2Ks bomb the front lines and
    Sukhois roam as Rafales deep-strike!!!!!
    Just a thought:dev2::cool:.

    O.K. I’m outta here.:o

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2378115
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Nothing, Jonesy.

    As in a tiny ball of non-exitence lost in the void, LOL.
    I have not even read about it in the Assemblée Nationale
    comitees’ reports and neither have i stumbled upon news in other fora.

    A logical appraisal would classify it as “grey works.
    There are news from the Rafale program and there are news from the
    nEUROn program, even commercial grade news, but there are none of
    the UCAV “wingman” thingy. It probably is almost purely Dassault dev.
    yet and as such easy to keep under the lid, don’t you think?

    It’s a good thing that Swerve and yourself brought it back too mind though
    and i’ll give it some attention ASAP.

    Good day gang, Tay.

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2378185
    Taygibay
    Participant

    @ Swerve

    Oh! Come on, mate! Of course i meant the final product and not the demonstrator.
    The thing is still the nEUROn whether you like it or not.
    A pic maybe would help you :

    http://medias.lepost.fr/ill/2010/06/24/h-20-2127782-1277374124.jpg

    That answer of yours was word mincing at its best/worse.

    Good day all, Tay.

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2378517
    Taygibay
    Participant

    @ Jonesy
    The program you are talking about is actually the nEUROn!
    The intent would be for 2 to 3 nEUROns to be “wingmen” to
    a Rafale B with the NOSA/WSO driving them.

    Good day all, Tay.

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2378897
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Monsieur, je salue votre perspicacité et m’excuse de vous comprendre parfaitement.

    Sir, I salute your perspicacity and am very sorry to understand you perfectly!

    Heartfelt thanks for this sincere appraisal, Tay.

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2379135
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Thanks PeterG for those additional links.

    Things are moving pretty fast, it seems!

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2379142
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Sorry, sir. Received and understood.

    Tay.:o

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2379165
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Might take a good chunk out of the bank account.

    Locally produced as part of the ToT, of course!:)

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2379259
    Taygibay
    Participant

    If they attack us we need soldiers, lots of them, supported by lots of artillery guns big and small, and a AF that ensures clear skies. 7-10 squadrons of F-35 with 4-5 posted along the Himalayan region will need a hell of a lot of sorties to bomb PRC logistics (to make an impact on any war effort), no answer for more troops more guns and clear skies.

    But a good semi-stealth MMRCA with cruise missiles:rolleyes: would be nice.

    Good post, insomnia.D.

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2379283
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Modern era has just struck you too?

    The U.S.A. of today is fully twenty-first century since
    that unfortunate event in New-York empowered one of
    if not the worst President they ever elected.

    Most of their thinking is based on events dating from
    the Reagan years to now and all else went down the drain.

    For most Americans, their country’s modern history begins
    with the Fall of the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain which
    conveniently allows for amnesia over Vietnam for instance.
    Of course, they won the World in WWII but anything before
    that is quite fuzzy.

    Darn it must be lonely to be an old-schooled reasonably
    educated gentleman down there!

    A generalization to be sure and do pardon the outburst but
    not too inaccurate, I’m afraid.:(

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2379326
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Very interesting indeed mate, many thanks for posting it!

    If the intent is to deliver first strike on China is paramount,
    this whole line of thought is flawless, especially since it would
    help stabilize the F-35 program and be a nice two-way deal.

    If however the Indian Air Force wants to use it for ground troops support
    AND has doubts about other project’s timelines, then it is all ooplah and no substance.

    The MMRCA is an aquisition program whereas the LCA
    and FGFA are development projects as the F-35 remains until it has been accepted in
    service with the U.S. armed forces.

    If any or all of these would see delays/problems, the IAF which is complaining as is about
    format reduction and squadron losses would find itself crippled.

    On the other hand, F-18 are rolling hot of the assembly line, Typhoons
    could be pulled from it immediately as all partners are trying to delay
    Tranche 3s for financial reasons and would gladly wait a bit and of course
    the French govt would be ecstatic about planning delivery from the onset of
    AESAed Rafales which first two radars have been delivered to Dassault already!

    Like all of us at times, I’d have to say that the author made his reasoning in a relative vacuum, sorry!
    Do note however that delays in announcing the MMRCA winner or even TEJAS
    solving all its bugs within the month 😉 would change that perspective so that,
    time passing by, this F-35 option will gain credence.

    Good day all, Tay.

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 639 total)