@Loke
.
.
.
๐
12F, Danell baby : 12F!!!
Don’t quiz him on Agapanthe and the likes, he’ll nail you hard!
:diablo:
Understood and…
agreed with the both of you but i was used to low speed wind
tunnels looking like these : Langley and DNW respectively and
high poles for RCS testing and the likes as in LM’s Helendale ( link ).
.
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/11153.jpg
:confused:
djcross got it, Max. No visible anechoic treatment to be seen anywhere
around that room. The height of placement has me puzzled a tad; I’m
not sure why it is elevated to such an extent. Then again, as some mates
commented, it could be pure fakery and propaganda ๐ but you can see
the slots in the back for airflow control.
djcross got it, Max. No visible anechoic treatment to be seen anywhere
around that room. The height of placement has me puzzled a tad; I’m
not sure why it is elevated to such an extent. Then again, as some mates commented, it could be pure fakery and propaganda ๐
Exactly what i meant; thank you for the example.:rolleyes:
Good day all.
Ok! I’ll spring the two bucks for a lottery ticket, but some of you
guys are way too serious, so, re-post and re-lol.

.
๐ Have a good day all.
Take a look at the link that i gave with the picture, Erko.
Chinese officials being shown new stuff.
Might be the journo’s mistake of course and yet…
Read you later.
LOL. I really liked the two small flat walls on top of the
fuselage. Maybe they should be construed as additional
air intakes for an IR stealth cooling channel?
Anyway, i sincerely believe that Photoslop will be remembered
as one of humanity’s funniest inventions… and that Chinese
are true blue fanboys, LOL.
๐
Hi, guys! I just thought that as long as we’re waiting for pics,
we might as well browse these over to pass time :
A nice assortment below and this one :
from here :
http://china-threat.blogspot.com/2008_11_01_archive.html
where spotters can have a laugh, a perk from surfing,
netsam if you will. ๐
Have a good day all.
Newswire :
The WallStreetJournal is a bit slow : lastweekjournal? lol
http://news.combataircraft.com/readnews.aspx?i=1063
Obligatory, my buddy, i like you too so as a friend,
I will warn you that you seem to be developing a
fan boy/troll borderline personality;) .
You just wrote :
Rafale would be ill suited to carry out tests with Meteor, as it only has one way data link.
In all likelyhood, some modification has to be done on Meteor before it can be used on Rafale.
So here is MBDA’s view of this point :
Meteor also provides two-way data-link communication between missile and
aircraft during flight, even at maximum stand-off ranges. This solution also
supports the possibility of third party targeting using MIDS or a Link-16 type
data-link.
Which is taken from the PDF on this page :
http://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda/site/ref/scripts/siteFO_contenu.php?lang=EN&noeu_id=194&arbo=2&page_id=300
and is preceded in the text by the mention that the Meteor
has autonomous engagement capabilities, of course.
Seeing that Raffy’s have MIDS/Link 16, which is shown below, er, moot point, mate!
The Rafale fighters used the Link-16 datalink network for allied aircraft. This technology ensures Rafaleโs interoperability with other weapon systems, in particular for a balanced allocation of firing plans between the different aircraft. Since all possible scenarios are recorded on the ground, if one Rafale does not hit its target another one can take over to complete the mission.
Read you later, good day all, TAY.
@Loke
just above another post which describes how much Saab has advanced with Meteor integration … Seems they have a lead even on the Fantastic Rafale!
In spite of what some Rafale fanboys claimed in other recent threads, the Gripen development seems to be doing quite well…
Just this once, you mixed it up thoroughly, mate!
The Gripen has been designated as THE main testbed
for the Meteor for all countries in that missile programme.
The schedules for integration of the Meteor country by country
are determined nationally. The initial date for such a trials-
to-induction testing protocol was initially given as 2018
in France.
When the UAE requested it as part of the weapons’ package
for the up-coming Rafale deal, THEN the French govt saw
the light. So it may now come as “early” as 2015.
All in all, politics my poor man, only politics.:o
Good day all, Tay.
I liked the ending sentence on that last post, swerve.
I’d even go as far as claim it a miracle that the French
Govt/DGA team is accomplishing this continuous upgrade
through successive standards/blocks on the Rafale program
considering how we never seemed able to manage such before.
It’s every soldier’s dream : A whole lot less bureaucracy; a few
more usable weapons on the field!:)
Yes obligatory, I did specify Typhoon and Gripen NG
in my offer for that very reason.
Let’s compare comparables. If we just talked about AESA
without particulars taken into account, then the Rafale
has been operating AESA since its delivery to the Royale
( French navy nickname, for the newbies ).
Of course, there is a small difference between a demo
and a fighter in production.
Heck the USN has tried very advanced concepts over the
years, but i consider “fielded” A/Cs only otherwise this would
count :
๐ฎ
@C-seven
Darn bro, I hope that you’re not an engineer for a French defence firm :
3015-2012 = 3++ ???????????????????????? LOL.