dark light

Taygibay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 639 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale F4 vs. Typhoon (ca. 2014) #2398740
    Taygibay
    Participant

    @Loke
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0YTZJpJ8Jp8/Sl0RBrlnjEI/AAAAAAAAFmQ/OmDIjHG4_NY/s400/funny-pictures-cat-scratches-post.jpg
    .
    .
    .
    ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2398745
    Taygibay
    Participant

    12F, Danell baby : 12F!!!
    Don’t quiz him on Agapanthe and the likes, he’ll nail you hard!
    :diablo:

    in reply to: J12 ? Is this for real or smoke and mirrors? #2400663
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Understood and…

    agreed with the both of you but i was used to low speed wind
    tunnels looking like these : Langley and DNW respectively and
    high poles for RCS testing and the likes as in LM’s Helendale ( link ).
    .
    http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/11153.jpg
    :confused:

    in reply to: J12 ? Is this for real or smoke and mirrors? #2400971
    Taygibay
    Participant

    djcross got it, Max. No visible anechoic treatment to be seen anywhere
    around that room. The height of placement has me puzzled a tad; I’m
    not sure why it is elevated to such an extent. Then again, as some mates
    commented, it could be pure fakery and propaganda ๐Ÿ˜‰ but you can see
    the slots in the back for airflow control.

    in reply to: J12 ? Is this for real or smoke and mirrors? #2400979
    Taygibay
    Participant

    djcross got it, Max. No visible anechoic treatment to be seen anywhere
    around that room. The height of placement has me puzzled a tad; I’m
    not sure why it is elevated to such an extent. Then again, as some mates commented, it could be pure fakery and propaganda ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: J12 ? Is this for real or smoke and mirrors? #2401198
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Exactly what i meant; thank you for the example.:rolleyes:

    Good day all.

    in reply to: J12 ? Is this for real or smoke and mirrors? #2401321
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Ok! I’ll spring the two bucks for a lottery ticket, but some of you
    guys are way too serious, so, re-post and re-lol.

    http://www.pycomall.com/images/P/JXX.gif

    .
    ๐Ÿ˜€ Have a good day all.

    in reply to: J12 ? Is this for real or smoke and mirrors? #2402245
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Take a look at the link that i gave with the picture, Erko.
    Chinese officials being shown new stuff.
    Might be the journo’s mistake of course and yet…

    Read you later.

    in reply to: J12 ? Is this for real or smoke and mirrors? #2403168
    Taygibay
    Participant

    LOL. I really liked the two small flat walls on top of the
    fuselage. Maybe they should be construed as additional
    air intakes for an IR stealth cooling channel?
    Anyway, i sincerely believe that Photoslop will be remembered
    as one of humanity’s funniest inventions… and that Chinese
    are true blue fanboys, LOL.
    ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: J12 ? Is this for real or smoke and mirrors? #2403189
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Hi, guys! I just thought that as long as we’re waiting for pics,
    we might as well browse these over to pass time :
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/images/j-xx-image08.jpg

    A nice assortment below and this one :
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ndiP3fDD-mY/R1oBX_M5MKI/AAAAAAAAAOY/X-zhdVTrNZg/s1600/jxx_01.jpg
    from here :
    http://china-threat.blogspot.com/2008_11_01_archive.html
    where spotters can have a laugh, a perk from surfing,
    netsam if you will. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    Have a good day all.

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2410329
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Newswire :

    The WallStreetJournal is a bit slow : lastweekjournal? lol
    http://news.combataircraft.com/readnews.aspx?i=1063

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2412461
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Obligatory, my buddy, i like you too so as a friend,
    I will warn you that you seem to be developing a
    fan boy/troll borderline personality;) .
    You just wrote :

    Rafale would be ill suited to carry out tests with Meteor, as it only has one way data link.
    In all likelyhood, some modification has to be done on Meteor before it can be used on Rafale.

    So here is MBDA’s view of this point :

    Meteor also provides two-way data-link communication between missile and
    aircraft during flight, even at maximum stand-off ranges. This solution also
    supports the possibility of third party targeting using MIDS or a Link-16 type
    data-link.

    Which is taken from the PDF on this page :
    http://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda/site/ref/scripts/siteFO_contenu.php?lang=EN&noeu_id=194&arbo=2&page_id=300
    and is preceded in the text by the mention that the Meteor
    has autonomous engagement capabilities, of course.

    Seeing that Raffy’s have MIDS/Link 16, which is shown below, er, moot point, mate!

    The Rafale fighters used the Link-16 datalink network for allied aircraft. This technology ensures Rafaleโ€™s interoperability with other weapon systems, in particular for a balanced allocation of firing plans between the different aircraft. Since all possible scenarios are recorded on the ground, if one Rafale does not hit its target another one can take over to complete the mission.

    from here :
    http://www.skycontrol.net/military-aviation/first-operational-exercise-in-the-united-states-for-rafale-fighter/

    Read you later, good day all, TAY.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2413622
    Taygibay
    Participant

    @Loke

    just above another post which describes how much Saab has advanced with Meteor integration … Seems they have a lead even on the Fantastic Rafale!

    In spite of what some Rafale fanboys claimed in other recent threads, the Gripen development seems to be doing quite well…

    Just this once, you mixed it up thoroughly, mate!
    The Gripen has been designated as THE main testbed
    for the Meteor for all countries in that missile programme.

    The schedules for integration of the Meteor country by country
    are determined nationally. The initial date for such a trials-
    to-induction testing protocol was initially given as 2018
    in France.
    When the UAE requested it as part of the weapons’ package
    for the up-coming Rafale deal, THEN the French govt saw
    the light
    . So it may now come as “early” as 2015.
    All in all, politics my poor man, only politics.:o

    Good day all, Tay.

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2413715
    Taygibay
    Participant

    I liked the ending sentence on that last post, swerve.
    I’d even go as far as claim it a miracle that the French
    Govt/DGA team is accomplishing this continuous upgrade
    through successive standards/blocks on the Rafale program
    considering how we never seemed able to manage such before.
    It’s every soldier’s dream : A whole lot less bureaucracy; a few
    more usable weapons on the field!:)

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2413726
    Taygibay
    Participant

    Yes obligatory, I did specify Typhoon and Gripen NG
    in my offer for that very reason.
    Let’s compare comparables. If we just talked about AESA
    without particulars taken into account, then the Rafale
    has been operating AESA since its delivery to the Royale
    ( French navy nickname, for the newbies ).
    Of course, there is a small difference between a demo
    and a fighter in production.
    Heck the USN has tried very advanced concepts over the
    years, but i consider “fielded” A/Cs only otherwise this would
    count :
    http://www.quick-tech-news.com/images/star-wars/xwing-crash-star-wars.jpg
    ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    @C-seven
    Darn bro, I hope that you’re not an engineer for a French defence firm :
    3015-2012 = 3++ ???????????????????????? LOL.

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 639 total)