Thnx TMor!
I Heard that the nEUROn thing was indeed included
in the global package FR/BR.
Will have to look for links though.
Good day all.
Oh! Yes, yes, yes!
That could be it, snafu…and it would be to the
AdlA/Mindef’s disadvantage in the long run too
as they’d later seem like fools.
So ALL sims, contests or evaluations are out ( Cola )
on account of their respective biais and the only live
result is no good either because Jackonicko says so :
Let me make it even more clear.
The CO of EC 1/7 is clearly a credible figure by virtue of his position.
However, the claims he made were so misleading as to be wrong.
He is personally credible. His claims, in this instance, are not credible.
……………………………………………………….
Me wonder if this worth talking then, HUH!
Or as a better Brit would have put it :
MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING?
Maybe the only problem is our resident ev… expert’s stance!
Tactical drop :
http://www.institutodeengenharia.org.br/site/pffnot.php?id_sessao=4&id_noticia=2974
and
Of course, you should disregard google’s horrendous
numbers translation and check the original.
ROFLMAO.
Claims about Typhoon’s superior MMI are not made up out of thin air.
backed up by large numbers of unnamed sources,
I dunno about anyone else, but I don’t care who tells me the truth, nor whether they are prepared to be indentified. If it’s good information, or seems to be good information, then of course I’ll pass it on.
Well, i do care who tells me the truth.
In astrophysics, Stephen Hawking could tell me the truth and
you could tell me about your sources, lol.
Actually, almost the same as here, relol.
You are a copy/paste dream, dear fellow!
BTW…
7:1 is rubbish.
Entirely agreed, so is 6-2 and so is 51-45 ( GB/ARI ),
4-0 ( TOR/PHI ), 2-2 ( ARS/EVE ) and heck, i’ll trow in
3.14159268, square root of two and all prime numbers.
Darn!
According to Jackonicko, our pilots can’t count and our squadron
leaders are delusional!
We should close all threads on the Rafale;
it seems we have more pressing problems than equipment!
Maman, au secours!
😀
But wrightwing…
even if it is the WashPost :
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/09/AR2009070903020.html
Do you remember the old joke about Ladas?
Adaptation : You cannot see the Raptor coming on account of stealth…
but you can follow it easily by the trail of pieces it leaves!
😉
OK cola!
Stay back a little just for a while, GANG, LOL.
A punch, line of course, from that link i posted that no one read :
A little more careful selection of the attending persons (getting rid of mere hobbyists passing themselves off as media)
:dev2:
Sorry Tango III…
but that happened in 2008 prior to Red Flag 08-04.
So that, while still impressive, it’s hardly news!
Good day all!
in ref. to post # 398
We should…
have them scores read like modern hockey’s with ties.
Something like : F-22 : 1-0-5
Rafale : 0-1-5
Then again, as i said before, in percentage, the Raptor
hits 16.666% of times against a plane half its price or less!
Good thing that it is the master of BVR air superiority
( when the stealth material stays on ) otherwise i know a
few friends of mine that are American taxpayers that….
Absolutely, jdsgn!
I think that most French posters understand that.
But even as such, even knowing about the Growler’s
F-22 kill of yesterday, it is a correct score against the
Raptor.
Is anyone mistaking the Raptor with a Slouching Dragon
in dogfight? Powerful bird with thrust vectoring ( not the
Russian kind, better! ) would not turn around enough?
It’s all right by me as you understand it.
History.
Albeit recent history.
The saying goes that those who forget it repeat their mistakes.
This link from the past gives a score too :
http://www.milavia.net/specials/redflag08-4/
Same squadron, same squadron leader!
Also…
to expand on glitter’s post :
L’avion de combat français s’est également frotté au F-22, le chasseur le plus moderne de l’USAF. Au cours d’une rencontre, ils se sont affrontés à six reprises, le F-22 ne mettant qu’un seul coup au but.
The French fighter plane has also dueled the F-22, the most modern USAF
combat aircraft. During one encounter, they dueled it out six times, the F-22
shooting the target only once.
That is what Merchet reported.
Other sources specify Dogfight after the exercises, on the side.
If the AdlA reports on that, it does allow for the American to state
that DURING REGULAR ENGAGEMENTS, AS PART OF THE ATLC,
the F-22 was undefeated ( one can guess in BVR ).
So, apart from Phoon fans’ understandable sorrow, where’s the problem?
Thnx…
Swerve.
Your confirmation for the use/sense of “porkies” combined
with Jackonicko’s original sentence seem to make sense.
I’ll accept that even though :
porky [2]
n pl , porkies (Brit)
slang a lie, (Also called) pork pie
(from rhyming slang pork pie lie) /that’s from Collins!
All in all, same intent as usual from Jackonicko about the
French comments from ATLC. Let’s say : no more bad intent
than usual if no less.
So let’s get back on track.
True OPIT and yet…
this thread carries some of the CLUE game.
Who? journalist Jack
Where? in the simulation room ( or in Al-Dhafra )
By whom? Colonel Nonsense
With what weapon? The awful truth!