dark light

zoot horn rollo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,301 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What's that in the background? #1100479
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    There is an error in the spelling of the vessel shewn i.e Cicala should be Cicada an insect.:)

    You would have thought so, but it’s not an error. She was HMS Cicala and was a member of the Insect Class.

    http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/2217944

    in reply to: What's that in the background? #1100596
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant
    in reply to: What's that in the background? #1100598
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    Right, any more smart aleck answers and you will all be staying behind for detention…

    in reply to: What's that in the background? #1100706
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    Russia

    Very droll….:rolleyes:

    in reply to: What's that in the background? #1100712
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    http://www.naval-history.net/WW1zI24CMBsLarge.jpg

    in reply to: WANTED: Good home for the Harrier GR9 #1102005
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    So remind me why we went to war with Iraq in 2003 again? :rolleyes:

    The assessment of the National Security Council seems to be the same as in 1998 even though they were wrong that time! :diablo:

    Why? Because the Americans told us to.

    in reply to: Tornado accident 2007 serial number #2385499
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant
    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2385547
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    From the CSR document

    http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/documents/digitalasset/dg_191696.pdf

    The Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) concluded on 19 October, setting out a hard headed reappraisal of Britain’s foreign policy and security objectives, and the resources necessary to meet them.
    The SDSR sets out in its National Security Risk Assessment a clear prioritisation of the threats Britain faces: from global terror, cyber threats, natural hazards, international military crises should these materialise, and from the low probability but high impact risk of a large scale
    attack by another state. To deal with these risks while allowing for growing uncertainty about longer term threats, the Review chose an ‘adaptable’ strategic posture.

    New Chinook helicopters, new armoured vehicles, enhanced communications equipment and new strategic lift aircraft will make the Army more mobile, and more flexible. The RAF will be based around a fleet of two of the most capable fighter jets anywhere in the world: a modernised Typhoon fleet fully capable of air-to-air and air-to-ground missions; and the Joint Strike Fighter, the world’s most advanced multi-role combat jet. This fast jet fleet will be complemented by a growing fleet of Unmanned Air Vehicles in both combat and reconnaissance roles. For the Navy there will be a fleet of the most capable, nuclear powered hunter-killer submarines in the world; and six Type 45 Destroyers, the most advanced multirole destroyer there is. The Government will complete the construction of two aircraft carriers and fit a catapult to the operational carrier to enable it to fly a version of the Joint
    Strike Fighter with a longer range and able to carry more weapons. This will allow it to operate in tandem with the United States and French navies.

    At the same time, in order to focus resources on current and emerging threats, a number of older or non-essential capabilities such as Harrier jets, Nimrod MRA4 maritime patrol aircraft and some frigates are being reduced or withdrawn.

    Having concluded the value for money review of Trident, the Government will proceed with the programme to renew the submarine-based nuclear deterrent. The recommendations of the review are expected to result in reductions in expenditure of at least £750 million over the Spending Review period and around £3.2 billion over the next ten years.

    Britain’s Armed Forces are the backbone of its national security. But their efforts have to be complemented by other tools including:
    •• strong international relationships;
    •• a global network of diplomatic missions;
    •• an international development programme that contributes to national security goals;
    •• effective capabilities for tackling crime, illegal immigration, terrorism and civil emergencies at home; and
    •• the resilience to absorb and recover from natural disasters and attacks.

    Across all these areas, the SDSR funds the capabilities needed, while identifying efficiencies that will allow them to be delivered at lower cost.

    in reply to: WANTED: Good home for the Harrier GR9 #1102253
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    Clearly this is not something the National Security Council thinks is going to happen

    3.25 Our assessment remains the same as in the 1998 Strategic Defence Review: for the foreseeable future, no state or alliance will have both the intent and the capability to threaten the United Kingdom militarily, either
    with nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction, or with conventional forces.

    http://interactive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/documents/security/national_security_strategy.pdf

    in reply to: General Discussion #324742
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    What is it about Tory governments and Ark Royal? The previous Ark Royal was scrapped during a Tory government and now this one. Do they have something against the name?

    Yes I know it’s a coalition government at the moment…

    in reply to: Where can we park the Ark? #1905177
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    What is it about Tory governments and Ark Royal? The previous Ark Royal was scrapped during a Tory government and now this one. Do they have something against the name?

    Yes I know it’s a coalition government at the moment…

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386381
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    Sentinel is a real suprise. I think between us we predicted almost all of the things listed but that one came out of no where, especially since they are canning Nimrod….

    So, what future will the Shadow King Airs have then?

    in reply to: Scottish Aviation Limited / Beagle queries #1105772
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    And there’s the unfinished Twin Pin c/n 585.

    Who’s that in the picture? This brings back memories of bunking round the SAL site trying to keep one step ahead of security. Dane Murdoch and I got nabbed one December whilst standing under Benie Cornfeld’s CV240 N93218 having just “done” the RCAF storage hangars.

    in reply to: 101 uses for a dead Anson… #1108684
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    I like this a lot and I only hope that I will get to fly to Calgary sometime to see this how it is meant to be seen, from the air.

    in reply to: Excellent Falklands war documentary #2024724
    zoot horn rollo
    Participant

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=81971 from over on the historic forum with participants from both sides putting information in

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,301 total)