dark light

AirToAirCombat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 173 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Waste of money #2605581
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    such trivial parts are hardly worth the effort of special mentioning as they cost pennies. what kind of cost saving do you expect to make from saving on such things?

    how about aircraft hydraulics? machined metal components, Commercial off the shelf computer chips, circuit boards, capacitors, resistors, and other electronics parts? Color LCD screens?

    You could probably buy these parts at equal or higher quality at a cheaper cost from any number of foreign manufactures in western countries without compromising your defense industry.

    in reply to: Waste of money #2605634
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    When I said non-critical, I was thinking of wire bundles, nut, bolts, standard industry fasteners, low technology machined parts, etc.

    I don’t think the US aircraft industry needs a strategic skills in producing wire bundles.

    in reply to: Waste of money #2605636
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    I’d have to disagree with you there. The SH is more than adequate for the USN’s current needs. It’s serving in greater numbers than the F/A-22 ever will and does a better job hauling bombs to the target.

    It also saw true active service nearly a decade earlier than the Raptor.

    The F-35 maybe stealthy, but it’s also at least 10 years until it even starts to active service.

    Until that time, the SH is a great deal for the money.

    in reply to: Waste of money #2605647
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    thats a very short sighted point of view.

    its also not just about jobs, but maintaining the ability to make something, as highly skilled and experienced people are key to the success of any nation’s areospace industry.

    I don’t think that’s entirely true.

    You want to retain the ability to make the most advanced parts. Anything else of a commodity nature or non critical nature, you’re better off farming out.

    I don’t think there’s a current US maker of ejector seats, unless Martin-Baker is a subsidiary of a US company.

    in reply to: Russia to launch new F/A-22 competetor other than PAK-FA #2605665
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    Especially when the NK variant was in some areas better… as the Tu-4 was better in some areas than the B-29.

    Well, that make it sound as if the US was never able to improve the B-29. They did. It’s called the B-50. For political reasons, they changed the designation from B-29D to B-50.

    If the Russians were so great at reverse engineering and improving the B-29, why couldn’t they build a copy better than the B-50?

    Sorry, but I don’t see copying the B-29 as an amazing feat of Russian enginuity.

    in reply to: Russia to launch new F/A-22 competetor other than PAK-FA #2605856
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    I don’t know if that’s such an amazing accomplishment.

    It’s far easier to make a copy when you’ve got the original sitting in front of you. Look what the Stormbird guys did with access to a Me-262. New build copies, no problem.

    in reply to: Is now a good time to buy a 2nd-hand digital SLR? #467565
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    If you are thinking about a D70 vs the D70S, I wouldn’t hesitate to buy a used D70 if you trust the seller. There is very little significant difference between the two.

    I don’t think that is true for the Canon 300 vs the 350.

    in reply to: Saudi Arabia's next combat aircraft #2607639
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    Next combat aircraft? How about police helicopters?

    The biggest threat to the Saudi are other Saudis. They’ve got radicals crawling all over the place. If they can’t keep the lid on the radicals, you’re going to see the Saudis go the way of Iran.

    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    Nice piece of fiction.

    in reply to: Fun With Google Earth #2609588
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    Can’t seem to see much of Pearl Harbor.

    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    The cost item is kind of questionable. You take out the pilot and replace him/her with a lot of computers, software, expensive electronics and comm gear.

    in reply to: the coolest looking jet fighter – top 10 #2619063
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    1. F-108 Rapier
    http://www.boeing.com/news/frontiers/archive/2002/august/i_history.html

    2. Rafale
    3. F-8 Crusader
    4. Gripen
    5. F-86 Sabre
    6. F-16XL
    7. YF-23
    8. Su-27 Flanker
    9. F-14 Tomcat
    10. Su-22

    in reply to: F-15C Eagle: Today's best Fighter. #2619725
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    The F-15s day as top dog in the fighter world is clearly passing. The clear advantage it once held over other fighter aircraft is no longer present.

    That’s why the USAF wants the F/A-22. The USAF Chief of Staff will be the first person to acknowledge that.

    in reply to: Eurofighter #2619808
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    So where does the Rafale stand now?

    Is it fully air to groud capable now? Is it as capable as the F-16 in the a2g mission or is it still running on an interim a2g feature set?

    in reply to: Eurofighter #2619925
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    As I recall, the Rafale entered service as an air superiority fighter with the other mission capabilities to follow in later upgrades.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 173 total)