Does Israel really need a new AAM?
Who are they going to shoot down? Palestinian ultralights?
I think they should concentrate more on the suicide bomber problem.
Re: Key pubs F-16 special
Originally posted by matt
why has something like this not been done for Russian or even European projects (the Jaguar eg)
More countries operate the F-16, hence the larger number of people who are interested in the F-16. It’s about how much $$ the publisher can make on sales.
Originally posted by par Benelos
yep, what about the $477 billion U.S. deficit
What about it? Do you think the US can afford all of the programs that it would like too?
The RAH-66 Commanche just got cancelled. The house cleaning has just started. The US AND France are no different.
And if everything is so great and wonderful in Rafale/PILOTGHT Land…why the “cut”/”slip”/”call-it-what-you-like”?
These are only the first 11 to go…trust me 😎
Ciao!
Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News
I agree. The French are in violation of EU treaty on budget defecits, and they are facing the same baby boomer / pension problems that the US and other European countries are facing.
There will be even more pressure to cut budgets from here on out.
The Pentagon doesn’t seem to have noticed
Wishful thinking?
This is a link to the Annual Report on the Military Power of the PRC from the Department of Defense.
No mention of 3 aircraft carriers. You’d think with all that satellite hardware the Pentagon would notice if China was building 3 45,000 ton Aircraft carriers.
Originally posted by Hyperwarp
Imagine if she was upgraded with a glass cockpit, one piece windshield, AESA, pheonix, Aim-9X, Aim-120C etc and the strike power close to the strike eagle!!
The F-14 would still have poor bring back capability, which means that it would have to dump unexpended ordinance before landing.
“Oh, well. Guess I’ll have to ditch this load of $32,000 dollar JDAMs if I want to get back home. Too bad. Why worry. It’s only taxpayer money and it’ll save the armory guys the trouble of putting back in the storage magazines anyway.”
That may not mean much to us armchair jet jockeys, but it seems to matter to the real professionals.
This whole deal stinks
Senator McCain was right, this whole deal stinks.
The USAF might need the tankers, but Boeing needs to put up a better deal, that or shutup and close down the 767 production line.
Originally posted by Vympel
To suggest that Russia elminates an arm of the deterrent triad is sheer folly,
Unless I’m mistaken, US bombers are no longer actively perform the nuclear mission, with the possible exception of 20 B-2s, which aren’t nuclear mission exclusive either.
Originally posted by Vaiar
Oh you mean somebody who knows that money doesn’t grow on the trees.
😀
I was hoping there’d be at least one person rooted in reality.
The Bush announcement is DOA.
Bush has already spent the money on the military and crushing Iraq. The US has a serious deficit that needs addressing.
These pressures are going to mean that the Mars program will never go very far.
The baby boomers are only getting older and Social security payment pressures will only get worse.
Eventually, a few years or so down the line when Congress has to decide to pay SS to the elderly or go to Mars, the elderly are going to win out.
Bet on it.
Is it really?
I find it interesting to hear that the Mirage 2000 has performed so well against the F-16.
If it can do that well against the F-16, then I’m assuming that it can do that well against a Flanker or MiG-29.
If the M2K is so good, why does France need the Rafale? Is the Rafale only for the French Navy?
Agree to disagree
GarryB,
I think we’re going to have to agree to disagree on your satellite recon theories.
I don’t believe that the technology or software that you claim is available is as good as you say it is.
I don’t seem to be making any headway in convincing you otherwise.
Personally, if it is as off the shelf and as good as you claim, I wonder why the US or China haven’t done it yet.
If it were possible, I’d think that it be easy for China to orbit a geosync with those capabilities. It’d certainly seem more useful than orbit a guy around the earth a few times.
Originally posted by GarryB
“Unless you can produce something to back up your claim, I highly doubt your claims about satellite capability. ”Here in Poor old New Zealand several large farms already use AI (Artificial Intelligence) programs for processing satellite imagery to count sheep in hard to reach paddocks. A Steam catapault gives off a rather large Heat signature that is quite distinctive and not really like anything else.
If you’re referring to commercial satellite imagry, then those orbits aren’t geosync as you stated in your earlier post.
Commercial and spy sats are low orbit and can’t continually cover the same location for very long. So you’re not getting 24 hour ocean recon from it.
Sure you can image a paddock if the wheather is cooperative. They don’t move and you can easily relocate it on a satellite pass. CVBGs aren’t that accomodating.
As for the heat signature, assuming that it can discriminate IR signatures from cat launches, a carrier can simply not launch aircraft for the few minutes that the satellite is overhead. There will be nothing to detect during the sat pass. Satellite orbits are very predictable.
Originally posted by GarryB
“Many of you are assuming that the Chinese would have the recon ability to find a CVBG. ”A modern geostationary satellite over China could spot a large group of ships within 1,000km of Chinas coast relatively easily. Unless the US has introduced EM catapaults an operating steam catapault has a rather distinctive and detectible signature… a simple program could automatically find such a feature without a human visual search.
[/B]
Unless you can produce something to back up your claim, I highly doubt your claims about satellite capability.
The very nature of Geostationary satellites means that they are high orbit satellites (35,850 km / 22,406 mi). The US Lacrosse 4 spy sat orbits at 690 km. Greater distance makes optical recognition more difficult.
I doubt the optical tracking is that good. There’s a lot of clutter out there. Naval ships aren’t the only ships on the seas especially near China. There’s all sorts of commercial traffic out there.
Carriers aren’t the only large ships out there. China is an oil importer from the Middle East. That means supertankers, which are the largest things afloat.
Don’t forget the weather. Clouds obscure visual and infrared. A good typhoon can generate cloud cover over hundreds of square miles of ocean.
I’m just talking about cloud cover. You don’t have to be in the middle of a raging typhoon to have a typhoon generate enough clouds to merely cover you.
Originally posted by SOC
“Even newer bomber like the Tu160 had been crashed two months ago killing all the crews on board.”
Two crashes in 20 years or so isn’t exactly a bad attrition rate.
It is if you know that the planes usually don’t have the gas to fly very much.