The F-16 started is operational life as a close range fighter.
Yes, but it’s service life is mostly air to ground. Some of the most significant upgrades it got are to the a2g missions.
exactly..however the JSF is a different kind of aircraft interms of missions..it is a strike aircraft first and an air-superiority second..Most of the things (tech) on it are gonna be tuned for a2g operations..however having said that it doesnt lack any bells and whistles of a modern a2a fighter like the rafale or typhoon…has stealth,modern design,IRST,HOBS,HMS,AESA radar,integrated avionics,and a top class EW suite…
The F-16 is the same. A strike aircraft first and a fighter second.
I think the JSF is better positioned. Air forces realize that the need for pure air superiority aircraft has decreased and are placing increased demand for strike aircraft. Case in point, the F/A-18E replacing the F-14 in the USN.
If you need a strike fighter with secondary air to air capability, why not by one designed with that from the start? You get an aircraft which will perform the primary mission better.
The Typhoon and Rafale are the opposite. Air superiority aircraft, which are trying to become strike aircraft. They still aren’t there yet. They are still waiting from tranche 3 or whatever their respective a2g upgrades are called.
Would they ?
It would make the planes even more expensive and more offensive.
Yes, I think they would. What distinguishes a Eurofighter or Rafale from a JSF? Generally speaking, they aren’t significantly different in performance with the exception of stealth.
Modern fighter aircraft, as a type, are probably going to serve in an air force for about 30 years. The cost of building a replacement is expensive and time consuming. Any air force which selects a non-stealth aircraft is probably not going to have a significant stealth capability for 3 decades.
That’s a long time.
AtAC, it’s not the ineptitude of the Europeans, it’s the false promises made to lure certain gullible European countries (the one i live in, for example) into the JSF project
This is where you secure the services of a good set of lawyers and demonstrate your willingness to sue often. 🙂
you mean Agusta Weastland I think. Eurocopter as nothing to do with the US101.
OK, AgustaWestland. Whatever.
Can you tell I’m not a helicopter fanatic?
LOL
on a more serious note all the other air-forces around the world can potentially make the same mistakes during combat…or maybe so a little more likely then those who have seen combat
Agreed. I think if the European fighter makers had a chance to go back and redesign the Typhoon or Rafale, they would have incorporated a greater degree of stealth in their designs.
I’m not following. Must be the heat.
Battlestar Galactica Vipers? 🙂
So the USAF is less likely to make the same mistakes that it did with the f-4.
Yes, they’ll make completly new ones. 🙂
hint : US101
Right.
Don’t blame me for the ineptitude of the Eurocopter negotiators. If they couldn’t live with the terms they didn’t have to bid and they sure as hell didn’t have to deal with LockMart or whomever the hell it is that’s building the 101.
That’s because it has the Grifo radar and Kaveri engine with Phazotron technology.
Europe, of course, must have it’s own to avoid being left behind. It is because the US won’t release the source gases necessary to inflate these windbags. 🙂
That is funny. So let us make a deal. You will develop a helicopter for me, from your own money. After that you pass all blueprints and data to me and your reward will be the fact that you have your own technology available.. 😉
My friend, I hope you are willing to accept, because I take this offer any day of the week! 😀
Need my phone number? 🙂
What are you trying to say? Can you rephrase that?
So why not give em what they deserve, then?
Maybe they don’t deserve the whole thing?
BAE has contributed it’s VTOL expertise. Don’t they already have what they’ve contributed? It’s BAE technology right? They didn’t do the rest of the development work so why do they get rights to it?
I think the number of cannon shell strikes in the final dogfight was also unrealistic given a short burst, gun rate of fire, spacing between shells, etc.
An M61, assuming that it’s spun up and firing at full speed rate of fire of 6,000 rds per minute with a spacing of 5 feet per shell, would get about 8-9 hits along the longest axis of an F-14.
In the movie, you saw 10-15 hits only inches apart. No way the Russian could have scored that many cannon hits.
😀 HAHAHAHA, you are kidding us right? Reports in the Dutch media started with unit cost of 31 million Euros, then it was 39,5, then 45 million, and now it is expected to be 60 million Euros! for the CTOL version. By the time, the contract is signed, it will be 75-85 million, just as Dassault and Eurofighter offered. At least they were realistic I guess.
Are they assuming that the exchange rate is going to remain constant?
The Euro is strong against the US dollar at the moment, meaning that purchasing a JSF might wind up costing less in Euros.
If body count is what you’re after, I think you’re better off focusing on the airlines.
During this period, I think more people were killed in domestic Japanese air crashes than all of the incidents in this thread combined.