dark light

AirToAirCombat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 173 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Missing Aces #2650679
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    This is from the Air Force Association’s Air Force Magazine. Great article.

    Next time, you might want to just stick with a link.

    I think the owner of this forum is trying to discourage wholesale copying of copyrighted content into the forum becuase of the potential legal liability.

    in reply to: Future of USAF F-15s #2651325
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    Wow…when did the production line close in St Louis? Those airframes are going to be pushing 40 years!

    The production line hasn’t closed. Boeing is still turning out F-15s for South Korea.

    There are a number of improvements that might be incorporated into an F-15C upgrade. The F100-229 engine used on the F-15E for example.

    in reply to: Seoul selects 2 AWACS bidders #2653127
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    Seoul selects 2 AWACS bidders
    The bidders should give to Korea key technology for the radar system and delegating at least 30 percent of the project’s money to domestic subcontractors, Won explained.
    By Joo Sang-min

    That’s interesting. I’d expect the radars to represent much of the actual cost of the project. I wonder if that means they’re angling for a share of the radar/avionics part of the contract.

    in reply to: Online accounts of Gulf War I Shootdowns? #2654507
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    This article from the Air Force Association might be helpful

    http://www.afa.org/magazine/Sept2004/0904aces.asp

    in reply to: Some Classic SAABs #1561805
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    Hmmm. Really would have liked to have seen a Tunnan.

    GDL, is that a J21R?

    in reply to: What should Mexico replace their F-5 with? #2657667
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    My guess would be next to nothing for the airframe itself if you’re getting it from the USAF.

    I believe the Italian lease is for 5 years with an option for 5 more. Have no idea what the costs are.

    The costs for refurbishment / upgrades would probably run into the millions though. Still it be cheaper than buying new. Like I said, getting the Italian F-16s as they come off of lease is ideal. Those birds have already been refurbished after they came out of the AMARC boneyard at Davis Monthan

    http://www.codeonemagazine.com/events/apr_01/apr01_events15.html
    http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123004928

    in reply to: What should Mexico replace their F-5 with? #2657685
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    F-16s are the way to go.

    Italy has leased refurbished F-16s until the Eurofighters enter service in adequate numbers. If Mexico can wait, they can probably pick up the F-16 coming off of lease for next to nothing.

    in reply to: Trainer Aircraft Market Could Be Worth $42B, Study Says #2662454
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    HAhahah yeahh so true. I think it will take another World War to have a boom like that.

    You see all sorts of stuff going on in UAV/UCAVs, but it’s hard to get as excited about it espcially when you see the micro UAVs that look like something from your local R/C model shop.

    Sure it’s a revolution and that might excite professional military people. I’m just an armchair airplane nut and what I love to hear about is airplanes shooting down other airplanes. At this stage you’ll never hear about UCAVs dueling one on one in air to air combat. To me that’s boring.

    in reply to: Trainer Aircraft Market Could Be Worth $42B, Study Says #2665279
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    Simply put, the most massive aviation market in the coming decades outside the US.

    I think one of the reasons that European and Russian fighter manufacturers will eventually lose sales is that China will come to depend more and more on it’s own aviation industry for fighter aircraft.

    A healthy internal fighter market can do wonders. I’d wager that the Europeans and Russians both wish they had the same.

    in reply to: Trainer Aircraft Market Could Be Worth $42B, Study Says #2665948
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    I don’t know if you could say that the Europeans were wrong.

    If you’re Sweden, I’d say you were doing really well. The export market really never existed for Swedish aircraft if you exclude Austria.

    If they didn’t build the Gripen, Rafale, and Typhoon, we’d be talking about just one jet and that’d make the debates even more boring.

    in reply to: Trainer Aircraft Market Could Be Worth $42B, Study Says #2665974
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    I think you’re going to gradually see the disappearance of European fighter aircraft sales as you approach 2020, unless they can do something creative with UCAVs.

    The reason is that Europeans just aren’t investing in the necessary development. If European defence is serious about staying competitive in the market, they’d be rounding up every European country to sign on to an F-35 beater. That debate isn’t even out there because European defence contractors know that the will isn’t there in the various European capitals.

    The Typhoon got built because the big bad Soviets were still a threat. Rafale got built because it’s French. The Soviets are gone and the French can’t afford to go it alone anymore.

    Beyond 2020, the F-35 is going dominate manned fighter aviation and it’s going to be really dull. Makes you wish for the 50s when all sorts of amazing jets were coming out everywhere.

    in reply to: Japan to stop buying F-2 #2644329
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    where did I speak of bribes ? Only lies I said :p

    Well, maybe Dassault should have lied and told South Korea that France would defend it from a North Korean attack. Then they might have won the last South Korean fighter contract.

    in reply to: Japan to stop buying F-2 #2644708
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    If you look at Poland, let’s say that US replace bribe by lies 🙂

    So military alliances have nothing to do with it? The reason European defence contractors lose a foreign military contract is becuase the US bribes better and lies better than the European defence contractors? 😮

    Well, that explains things doesn’t it? I guess that’s why Dassault won the Rafale contract in France. The French naturally bribe and lie better at home. The Rafale is certainly not significantly better than the Eurofighter.

    in reply to: Japan to stop buying F-2 #2645071
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    As a US ally, the US could supply any number of useful items and the benefits of an alliance is that equipment is only part of the equation. The personnel needed to support and repair common equipment would have the same skills. This allows allies to better help each other.

    Could a USAF F-15 ground crew repair a Panavia Tornado? Of course not. However a USAF ground crew certainly could repair and replace a Japanese F-15 engine, airframe parts, radar parts, do maintenance checks, and gas up the jet. If necessary, they could even get the parts from USAF stockpiles.

    True, not all the parts are compatible becuase some equipment is Japanese designed and made. However, this scenario is possible becuase the Japanese bought/built US jets. There is no way the USAF could support a non-US aircraft in a similar way.

    The Japanese AWACs are US made and fitted with E-3 radars on a 767 airframe. What part on that aircraft’s radar could the US NOT supply from US military stockpiles?

    in reply to: Japan to stop buying F-2 #2645379
    AirToAirCombat
    Participant

    Right. Whatever.

    Yes, Lockheed got caught giving kickbacks to the Japanese PM (Takeo Miki) to buy Starfighters. Not that I blame Lockheed—this is how you learn to do business in the East. The Starfighter scandals has been the subject of entire books. Did the UK give kickbacks to the Saudis to buy Tornadoes. Maybe—the arms business is decidely corrupt. You don’t play the arms trade business with boy scout ideals. It’s just the nature of the scorpion.

    So what’s the point of bringing this up in the first place. Do US defence contrators bribe better than Europeans now too?

    US military equipment works. Military Cooperation is easier when allies share the same equipment. It is as simple as that.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 173 total)