Well, well, well….. Something unexpected.. PRC has been very silent about its anti-missile plans.
China conducts test on ground-based midcourse missile interception – http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2010-01/11/content_12792329.htm
http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2010-01/11/content_12792321.htm
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/china-says-missile-defence-test-a-success/article1427275/
There was also a report that the IAF Mig 29 As will be upgraded with Zhuk-M/2 which offers better range and new modes.
33% over the last generation is what is official about the Apg 68V9. But in this thread he cites a paper and say its 105 kms
105 km for what size target? 5m2, 3m2, 1m2? Zhuk-ME brochure is clear. It states 120km for 5m2 target (Look-up, head-on), plus plenty for other details.
I have found plenty of official brochures for Russian RADARs. Russian companies generally provide fair bit info. But I have not seen such releases from other countries especially American RADAR specifications.
This is what the official site states : http://www.es.northropgrumman.com/solutions/apg68/index.html
Kinda off topic, but since the Zhuk-ME was brought up:
What are the specs for APG 68V9? I don’t think they are publicly available.
hello,
don’t want to waste anyone’s time here, but where is the best image of what this aircraft will look like please?
there is quite a lot of variation on the web and I’m sure it will be brutally attractive…
Check out Paralay’s website – PAK-FA link : http://paralay.com/pakfasu.html
Here are some images I grabbed from here, there and everywhere – http://s988.photobucket.com/albums/af8/My-Military-Photos/RUS/Air/T-50/Pre-unveiling/
Strictly speaking, there are no official images. There have been some, releases from NPO Saturn, and a few lets say semi-official or semi-valid sort of release, leaks etc.
But we’ll have to wait until after the 1st flight.
T-50 is said to be much more like the regular Su-27 than the Su-47. So the RCS reduction, especially the hiding the engine face will require some other methods. The serpentine ‘S’ is not there with that design (Unless they go with the YF-23 like design).
Su-47 said to have dropped to 0.3m^2. Su-35S : 1-3m^2. MiG-1.42 ~8m^2.
Off-course,….that 0.5m^2 certainly could be the journalists messing things up. Like I said, time will tell.
.
.
.
Sukhoi’s FGFA prototype, which is expected to make its first flight within weeks, is a true stealth aircraft, almost invisible to enemy radar. According to a defence ministry official, “It is an amazing looking aircraft. It has a Radar Cross Section (RCS) of just 0.5 square metre as compared to the Su-30MKI’s RCS of about 20 square metres.
.
.
.
RCS ~0.5m^2? That could be anything. Frontal? Lateral? Some Overall value? Deliberate, mis-information? Plus, if they found a way to implement plasma stealth, then that should level things out. Time will tell… Well just have to wait…
How so?
Its quite a name you got there mate. Wellcome aboard! 🙂
I think he is referring to this. The arrangement is a lot more like the Su-27 than Su-47.

With and without those pods?
J-10B prototype 03


F**ker won’t be bad either. Two F**kers on my tail.

Flayer, Flamer, Feather, Flatter, etc, etc…
Fox + something,
Fire + something
Flat + something (Flattop, Flatfrog – since the Sukhoi guys said it looks like a flatten frog)
Possibilities enormous…
But I think we can definitely count-out Farter, and a particular ‘F’ word….
Why have they covered the intakes of Su-35 , any thing interesting about those intakes ?
Maybe the Russians don’t want people to see what exact modification have been done to the Intake/Engine-face to reduce the Su-35 RCS compared to older versions.
The modified weapons bay of the Berkut seems big enough to carry at least one R-72/KS-172. Anyone knows whether its the R-72 or R-37 that’ll be the ultra long ranged AAM for the PAK-FA?
Nice view of modified w/bay. Pic taken 10/09/09, published today:
[IMG-r]http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=179722&d=1…]
[ATTACH]179722[/ATTACH]
Excellent find….. This was the weapons-bay modification Over G was talking about.
…
PAK-FA wind-tunnel model? (with some creative blurring)[IMG-r]http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=102627&d=1260460…]
If that is an official/semi-official leak…..then….it is pretty much inline with the other leaks. There certainly is consistency in all these leaks. We still have wait for the official unveiling to know whether it is the right consistency.
…..Pogosjan please read.
“almeno una foto. Altrimenti non sei molto credibile” (parole in italiano dello staff Alenia)
Translation:
“at least one photo. Otherwise you are not very credible” (words in Italian staff Alenia)
“Additionally:
“even if this means that on board there will be 41 and not the 119”
huh?