dark light

chornedsnorkack

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 760 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: CSeries first flight date! #473620
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    CS300 has also entered into service, with Air Baltic by flying from Riga to Amsterdam.

    in reply to: Handling machinery when dehydrated #379548
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    How did the performance of pilots distracted by holding their bladders compare?

    in reply to: CSeries first flight date! #474863
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    Now that test flights of CS100 have been completed, does Bombardier plan to publish Airport Planning Manual?

    Found it:
    https://customer.aero.bombardier.com/webd/BAG/CustSite/BRAD/RACSDocumen…

    CS100 is in service now, with Swiss!

    in reply to: CSeries first flight date! #475037
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    CS100 is certified in Europe and USA!
    The EASA certificate:
    https://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/EASA%20TC%20IM%20A%20%20570%20-TCDS-CS100.pdf

    in reply to: CSeries first flight date! #475866
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    First flight scheduled!

    Swiss has scheduled the maiden flight of CS100!

    It is LX638, on 15th of July, 2016, ZRH-CDG. It has since been sold out.
    The next scheduled lines are:
    Also on 15th of July: Zürich-Budapest
    16th of July: Zürich-Manchester and Zürich-Prague
    20th of August: Zürich-Warsaw

    in reply to: QaNTAS pilot suicide by plane #476189
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    How about encouraging them not to kill themselves at all?

    Yep:

    What can be done to encourage pilots to kill themselves on ground? And what can be done to encourage pilots to continue living and get over depressiom?

    Compared to crashing a plane, even suicide on ground is better – but not killing themselves at all is even better.
    So strongly suspected crashes by pilot suicide:
    JAL 350, in 1982. The comrades in cockpit were able to limit damage – the suicidal captain failed, but 24 people did get killed.
    RAM 630, in 1994. All hands lost, 44 in number.
    Silkair 185, in 1997. All hands lost, 104 in number.
    Egyptair 990, in 1999. All hands lost, 217 in number.
    Lam 470, in 2013. All hands lost, 33 in number
    Germanwings 9525, in 2015. All hands lost, 150 in number.

    Of course it’s a serious matter, but why not worry more about a mad truck, bus, train drivers, the weird guy in the cubicle or your odd neighbor?
    Those people don’t have the routine medical screenings airplane pilots do.

    Let’s face it, we’re far more likely to get killed a drunk just leaving a pub. If one musr worry about something, look up a list of incurable diseases, worry about an asteroid hitting Earth, or my favorite, being savaged in my sleep by my basset.

    That´s a good reasoning. Considering the number of planes that have arrived safely at their destinations since 1982, 6 crashes for a common cause may be an insignificant hazard not worth worrying about.
    But if the problem of pilot suicide is insignificant, then the airlines AND civil aviation authorities certainly do address it as if they saw some problem there.
    Airlines might trust in the good will and humanity of their pilots, even while depressed, and continue to roster and employ pilots who are confessing to be depressed and actively suicidal, on grounds that they have the sense to kill just themselves and harm no one else. Or they might permit pilots to apply whatever medical treatments are offered for depression, while continuing to be rostered and employed.
    The airlines do not, and apparently the civil aviation authorities do not permit them. Causing the pilots to not confess to depression, and giving them more reasons to be depressed about.
    If the prospect of pilot suicide by plane is not a serious problem, then the reaction of airlines and civil aviation authorities to this is an overreaction, in which case it is that overreaction which is the serious problem.

    in reply to: "Most luxurious" private plane? #381163
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant
    in reply to: CSeries first flight date! #477213
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    APM

    Now that test flights of CS100 have been completed, does Bombardier plan to publish Airport Planning Manual?

    in reply to: CSeries first flight date! #477602
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    Test flights of CS100 have been completed. What remains is awaiting certification, CS300 tests and publicity flights.
    Swiss specified first delivery as May 2016.
    CS100 visited Bromma and Riga airports. Air Baltic expects CS300 delivery in September 2016, and considers exercising their 7 options.
    CS100 returned by a nonstop flight Riga-Montreal, although lightly loaded.

    in reply to: Leap missing fuel burn targets #481356
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    If 737MAX is squeezed between CS300 and A320NEO, both of which have efficient GTF engines, how can Boeing respond?

    in reply to: Leap missing fuel burn targets #481547
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    Did I hit a sore point? Or just in a sensitive mood today?

    Boeing will probably do alright-ish*. The slot constraints on A320 will see to that. But their SA market share would drop, maybe significantly.
    For GE and Snecma it could be a bit of a disaster – they could be paying out penalties for a good few years.
    Not too many are going to buy the C919 for performance reasons, so it is kinda irrelevant.

    Can any disappointed 737MAX customers or would-be customers buy CS300 instead? Like the airlines for whom 737MAX was slightly too much plane, but A320 far too much?

    in reply to: CSeries first flight date! #481567
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    Lufthansa Technik claims Swiss has resigned to be the launch customer:
    http://www.lufthansa-technik.com/cseries

    in reply to: Leap missing fuel burn targets #481737
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    So what is the range of 737MAX?

    in reply to: Leap missing fuel burn targets #481746
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant

    More at Leeham

    Subscription required.

    in reply to: 747 Palace in the sky #481969
    chornedsnorkack
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 760 total)