What is the bigger issue – solo pilot large planes, or solo pilot longhaul?
Solo pilot longhaul, and two pilots longhaul, basically come to the safety of unmanned passenger planes…
Technological advancements won’t do anything to stop pilots from suddenly falling ill, collapsing and even dying while flying. This does happen and so it would never really be safe for widespread commercial flights to be flown with one member of flight crew, regardless of the technology on board.
Certainly it does.
How frequent, in the fields where single pilots now fly (private planes and small commercial planes) are crashes due to solo pilot illness, as opposed to crashes due to solo pilot being overwhelmed and distracted by flying duties, or making stupid errors that a copilot would have corrected?
Cseries stronger than planned!
Cseries wing and fuselage breaking tests proved them stronger than hoped:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/06/11/343168/bombardier-bending-cseries-wing-to-ultimate.html
Bombardier may achieve weight reductions.
Or perhaps weight boost?
Cseries about to freeze!
Due to freeze in July:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/06/11/343204/bombardier-to-freeze-cseries-design-next-month.html
Derated takeoffs change V1, VR, V2, second segment climbs, etc. Should Vmcg be calculated it would change as well.
Like the FARs turned out to say, Vmcg must be established with “maximum available takeoff power on the operating engines”. So in case of paper derate, either Vmcg is unchanged or else the full thrust is made unavailable even in emergency.
Vmcg is estimated base on weight and selected takeoff thrust. The definition of Vmcg is the minimum speed an aircraft can maintain directional control on the runway using rudder only at takeoff thrust. On a derated takeoff all v-speeds are calculated based on that selected takeoff thrust, the current weight of the aircraft and pressure altitude, that includes Vmcg if an aircraft has one. For a given weight the value of all v-speeds will vary depending on the selected takeoff thrust setting and temp/altitude.
The use of the remaining available thrust after an engine loss has no impact on Vmcg. Vmcg can’t exceed V1 and any emergency situation prior to V1 requires aborting the takeoff and not flying. In other words, once the takeoff is aborted that excessive thrust will never be applied no matter what takeoff thrust setting that was selected.
So, suppose that a takeoff thrust is selected, lower than the available emergency thrust, Vmcg is lowered based on the selected takeoff thrust and V1 is lowered accordingly, so that it is bigger than Vmcg for selected takeoff thrust, but lower than what Vmcg had been for available emergency thrust.
And right after V1 – still below what Vmcg had been for available emergency thrust – one engine fails.
What thrust will then be applied by the remaining engine – the selected takeoff thrust, or the available emergency thrust?
Derated takeoffs change V1, VR, V2, second segment climbs, etc. Should Vmcg be calculated it would change as well. The same could be said for Min vs. Max weight takeoffs. I don’t know what you’re implying with your question.
Vmcg is estimated for the case of one engine out and the other providing full thrust near V1. Which is an emergency situation to begin with. So how can Vmcg be changed for derate if the derated thrust would be exceeded in emergency (and take the airplane right off the side of runway at high speed)?
You’ve answered your own question and probably don’t realize it. Derated takeoffs extend the life of the engine but don’t change the amount of available thrust in an emergency situation.
What exactly do paper derates do to the Vmcg?
Why would a manufacturer design to have different thrust on different engines? Sure losing the less powerful engine would be less of an issue but on the flip side losing the more powerful engine would make a bad situation evenworse.
But not worse than losing one of the two engines on a twin.
I wouldn’t say a major constraint is asymmetrical thrust from an abnormal situation. It’s a lot easier to fiddle with the size of the rudder and add new software to the flight computer than messing around with engines.
A lot of planes do add software to flight computers, and have paper derate of MTOW and engine thrust without actual physical alterations of structure or engines.
lets have all this extra drag from something which isnt doing much…
Engines derated on paper have the same size, weight and drag as engines providing their full rated thrust. So why do lower MTOW variants of airliners not have physically smaller engines installed?
Eyjafjallajökull and St Helens
When North American airspace was shut down in 2001, it had not happened since Cold War exercises in 1960…1962.
How much North American airspace remained open in May 1980?
Turks following suit!
Turks are following suit:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/03/15/339302/turkish-government-outlines-plan-to-build-regional-aircraft.html
Shouldn’t this be in Commercial, for what it’s worth.
What does this have to do with Commercial? It is a dedicated VIP plane of no commercial use. Whether Catherine Ashton ends up with Socata TBM850 or an Airbus 380, it is general aviation.
Leap X1C specifications
See:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/03/08/339093/cfm-serving-no-leap-before-its-time.html
190 cm fan diametre, 134 kN thrust.
Hopefully it will see additional orders soon.
It has. Republic airways. 40 firm orders, 40 options for CS300. Single class interior, 138 seats.
In 2014, what would be your preferred plane to Reunion?
777-300ER?
Air France. 472 seats.
Or 747-400, Corsair. 582 seats.
Or A380-800, Outre Mer 380. 840 seats.
AF 777-300ER carries 14 Affaires seats and 36 Alize seats. And Corsair 747 also has 24 business class seats.
Somewhere in the front end far, far away in either case.
The cattle class seats are 10 seats abreast in each case.
A380 is wider than B747. And B747 is wider than B777.
So, will you prefer to sit with 471 seatmates, or with 839?