If Ryanair can fill A380 holds then they can also fill A330 or B767 holds. They have the same headroom, roughly 170 cm.
what do you mean not crashed yet?
Answering, but as requested not quoting the previous post:
It takes two of the present large A/c to mince 550 pax though, as per Tenerife.
My point is, a single present Corsair aircraft can do it quite well.
One present airliner has quite well succeeded in mincing 505 passengers together with the 15 crew, as per Mount Takamagahara. It is just a coincidence that Corsair has not crashed yet, and 747 still is the plane with most seats.
What do you prefer to fly to Reunion? Corsair?
582 seats. On a 747.
For a long-range narrowbody, how about DC-8-72?
Although it ended production in 1972… how about Il-62M (last delivery 1994)?
Twotter!
747-800 has flown, but so has Twotter 400, 22 years after last Twotter was produced:
Which other planes decades out of production should continue production?
All prototypes have flown!
Since 4th of February already:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/02/10/338255/fourth-superjet-flies-as-sukhoi-targets-mid-2010-approval.html
I believe Embraer is getting into that segment. And the Chinese…
I haven´t heard of new bigger Embraers :confused:
Of course, there shall be MS-21 and Comac 919, from 2015…2016 or so.
To be fair, there isn’t a great deal of choice in the market for a narrowbody aircraft of that size – there’s the 737, the A320, and the, errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Tu-204.
Nice cockpit..the passenger cabin looks like your average 767 to me :rolleyes:
No 767 squeezes 9 seats abreast.
What about 777, or 330?
They are forcing airlines to buy from a ‘catalogue’ of economy options, i.e. when you get your new aircraft Boeing will supply the economy section
Well, just make sure you fly an airline that uses 2-4-2 then
Can 787 have 2-4-2? Remember how Boeing pushes 3-2-3. Has Boeing made the point of excluding a 2-4-2 option, to ensure it is 3-2-3 or nothing?
Those windows are HUGE
DC-8 has bigger.
Grounded by trash
Anymore news? I haven’t seen anything on the Boeing website, nor received any alerts?
The second frame was grounded after its maiden flight because of a cleaning rag and unidentified flying objects found in the fuel tanks:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/01/14/337184/debris-forces-second-787-back-to-everett.html
First export customer!
Comac got first export customer for ARJ-21. Lao Airlines:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/01/11/336964/lao-airlines-purchases-two-arj21s.html
That’s not disagreement, but actualy agreement with my opinion
I still disagree.
If Roissy had been “slot limited”, SQ would not have left 3 slots empty. They could have gone from 10x 777-300ER to 7x 380 and 3x 777-300ER.
They did not. Which proves that Roissy is not slot limited. And that A380 is not limited to slot limited airports.
Then the 747 became what it was designed to be, a long haul work horse that was primarily bought because of it’s until recently unrivalled range.
How did 747-400 range compare against A340-200? B777-200ER?
By it’s own design, the A380 is limited to a single market, high density slot restricted markets. There are only so many of those.
SQ disagrees. They have the slots for 10 weekly flights to Roissy. On 777-300ER no less.
They left 3 of them empty, cut their costs and added 20 % seats by changing 7 slots to A380.
One reason for popularity is the ability to re-sell an aircraft. The larger the range, the higher the residual value. Many airlines operate aircraft which have much more range than actually needed.
The B777-300ER are becoming B747 replacements.
What precisely do A330-200 replace?
B777-300ER and A330-200 are the two widebodies that are selling.
Unfortunately, both manufacturers are increasing the range of their latest products. The B787 for example as basic version has a massive range, which makes its use for a route like Western Europe to US East Coast questionable. Same with the A350, but I doubt we will ever see an A350-800 lifting off (shrinks never sell).
B787-300 has abnormally short range, but is not a shrink from 787-800. While A350-800 has hardly longer range than A350-900.
Is there a need for a real A350 shrink, with a smaller wing?
What shall be the next progress point?
First flight of third frame, or type inspection authority?