You are obviously not up to date with the Prince’s plane (now sold)!
I´m not up to date either. Who bought that A380?
For comparison:
Embraer 190: 92,5 m2
MD-80/90: 112 m2, matching CSeries
MD-90-30ER is known to have reached 76,2 t MTOW in the MD-90-30ER version – but not exceeded 172 seats.
Anyway, all 5 CS100 prototypes are flying now.
The range allegedly exceeds expectation, and shall be disclosed in Paris.
Is FTV5 in condition to undertake a nonstop flight Mirabel to Le Bourget in June?
More good news:
leehamnews.com
So, for comparison:
CS100 before the discovered and as yet unspecified range increase: 2950 nm, takeoff distance 1463 m
CS100 at “urban” weights, also without range increase: 1700 nm, takeoff distance 1219 m
A318, old wing: 3100 nm, takeoff distance 1828 m
A318, sharklets: 3200 nm
A319OEO, old wing: 3600 nm, takeoff distance 2164 m
A319OEO, sharklets: 3700 nm
A320OEO, old wing: 3100 nm, takeoff distance 2090 m
A320OEO, sharklets: 3300 nm
A321OEO, old wing: 3000 nm, takeoff distance 2560 m
A321OEO, sharklets: 3200 nm
B737-600, old wing: 3050 nm, takeoff distance 1750 m
B737-600, winglets: 3225 nm
B737-700, old wing: 3365 nm, takeoff distance 1600 m
B737-700, winglets: 3440 nm
B737-800, old wing: 3060 nm, takeoff distance 2400 m
B737-800, winglets: 3115 nm
MD-87: 2370 nm, takeoff distance 2300 m
E1-190AR: 2400 nm, takeoff distance 2056 m
E1-195AR: 2200 nm, takeoff distance 2179 m
A319NEO: 4200 nm
A320NEO: 3700 nm
A321NEO: 3650 nm
A321NEOLR: 4000 nm
B737MAX7: 3800 nm
B737MAX8: 3620 nm
B737MAX9: 3595 nm
E2-190: 2800 nm, takeoff distance 1800 m
E2-195: 2000 nm, takeoff distance 1950 m
CS300 first prototype flew for 5 hours on maiden flight, circling near airport, but climbing to FL410 and accelerating to 500 knots.
How many CSeries prototypes are left on ground? By my count, last (5th) CS100 and last (2nd) CS300. Correct?
The engine oil issue has been repaired and CSeries resumed flying after 100 days on ground:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/cseries-flight-ends-100-day-grounding-403420/
Fourth prototype flew:
http://cseries.com/ftv4-takes-off-on-its-maiden-flight/
Finally delayed – and a lot:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/bombardier-delays-cseries-service-entry-394921/
Second half of 2015.
It is said that the second CS100 prototype is due for maiden flight in about a month.
When are the prototypes needed at a specific time?
It flew in more than three months:
https://twitter.com/bombardier_aero/status/419134576918003712
The A318s were flown by British Airways in an all business-class configuration from London City Airport to New York JFK, if my memory serves me correctly. The flight numbers are the old Concorde flight numbers: BA001 etc. They were intended for wealthy business people who needed to fly out of LCY to New York on a frequent basis.
But they do not get in Concorde Room.
You’re right that the A318 is a small aircraft on which to cross the Atlantic.
It is Concorde that is a small aircraft:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-France/Aerospatiale-British-Aerospace-Concorde/2310556/L
Concorde was designed for midgets, preferably midgets without any hand-luggage. There were surprisingly few complaints about the poor headroom and tiny seats because the overpaid employees whose tickets were being paid for by their companies didn’t want to lose face in front of the economy class tourists who had twice the room on a 747 for a tenth of the price.
A318 is huge:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/British-Airways/Airbus-A318-112/1748083/L
even bigger than 747 cabin:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Delta-Air-Lines/Boeing-747-451/2188425/L
Sorry for repeating mostly all of the above post, but I feel that it would be instructive to compare 5X with 7X
PERFORMANCE
Range @ Mach 0.80
(8 pax, 3 crew, NBAA IFR reserves, ISA, full fuel)
5200/5950 nm
9630/11020 km
MMO (Maximum Operating Mach Number) Mach .90 /both
Max. Certified Altitude 51,000 ft / 15,545 m /both
Balanced Field Length
(MTOW, SL, ISA)
5,250/5710 ft
1,600/1740 m
Approach Speed (Vref)
(Typical Landing Weight, SL)
105/104 kias
194/195 km/h (??)
WEIGHTS/CAPACITIES
Max. Take Off Weight
69,600/70 000 lb
31,570/31 300 kg
Max. Landing Weight
66,100/62 400 lb
29,980/28 303 kg
Max. Fuel Weight
28,200/31 940 lb
12,790/14 490 kg
ENGINES
2 Silvercrest Safran-Snecma/3 Pratt&Whitney Canada PW307A
11,450/6 402 lb
5,100/2 849 daN
(Max. thrust at SL – ISA)/( Max Thrust, ISA + 17°C, SL)
EXTERNAL DIMENSIONS
Height
24 ft 6 in / 25 ft 8 in
7.5/7.83 m
Length Overall
82 ft 7 in / 76 ft 1 in
25.2/23.19 m
Wing Span
85 ft 1 in / 86 ft
25.9/26.21 m
CABIN DIMENSIONS
Cabin Length
38 ft 8 in /39 ft 1 in
11.79/11.91 m
Cabin Height
78/74 in
1.98/1.88 m
Cabin Width
102/92 in
2.58/2.34 m
Cabin Volume
1,770/1552 ft3
50/44 m3
Baggage Volume
155/140 ft3
4.4/4 m3
Nordic Aviation Capital wants to buy CSeries – link for Flightglobal subscribers:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/nordic-aviation-capital-eyes-cseries-order-391422/
Also, how strong are the runway and ramps of Bromma?
Other prototypes
Out of the 5 CS100 prototypes, 1 has flown, but 2 more have engines:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pw-delivers-eight-cseries-engines-so-far-390594/
Pratt and Whitney has also delivered fourth pair of PW1500 engines, which is awaiting installation on a CS100 prototype.
It is said that the second CS100 prototype is due for maiden flight in about a month.
When are the prototypes needed at a specific time?
That would be somewhat complicated. DC-9 was stretched, but only to 187 seats of MD-90. To match the 280 seats of A310 and therefore also B757-300, the 5 abreast cabin of CSeries needs to be stretched rather longer than the 6 abreast B757-300. Not that it is impossible, Lockheed 2000-7 does have 273 seats in its cabin that also is 5 abreast, but is it worth the weight at subsonic Mach numbers?
It/she flies. Rotation was about 10 minutes ago, 5…6 minutes before the expected time 10:00 EDT.