SAS and Air Canada make noises about buying!
Fleet flown to Moscow!
Despite the date, it does look like true: both Superjets flew to Moscow.
Anybody that takes risk where kids are concerned want stringing up IMO. Always chokes me up when things like this involve innocent kids, can’t imagine what it would be like for them, having 3 young kids of my own, it’s horrable.
How many children were crashed in planes last year, and how many children were crashed in cars?
How many parents take their children in a car to get home or wherever they want to get in iffy weather?
One of the 14 souls was 1 year old, who can perfectly legitimately be held in lap with no sort of restraint.
The other children were two 3 year olds, 4, 5, 7 and 9. So, the plane was overloaded with the two 3 year olds.
Note that while both airliners and private planes require separate seats for 2 year olds, plenty of buses and trains do not, and allow rather bigger children to sit in the lap of an adult without a ticket.
Yet more specifications!
Increase of OEW had been caused by increased payload.
You might have to put an armoured bulkhead between the 2 engines to protect against an uncontained compressor/turbine failure ‘taking out’ the adjacent engine and or fuel system.
I know it is not a flying quality issue but might be an airworthiness consideration
There are 2 good reasons for keeping the original configuration -unloading the wing structure thereby making it lighter and the safety factor of engine separation.
Yes. And VC-10 does have paired engines. Does VC-10 suffer contagious failures?
As Mike said -more assymetric moment during engine failure but that is not the big problem it used to be – modern powered controls and safety systems should cope ok with outbd engine failure.
Powered controls cannot control the plane if the control authority is not there because the rudder has been made smaller to save weight and drag. All that the powered controls achieve is stall the airflow at rudder.
Flown AGAIN! – at last…
Flown again:
It took nearly four months to have second flight. They hope to have a third flight in less than half a month, this time.
Straight to the Mojave desert for a holiday in the sun!!!
Why?
They already are in desert!
About to be stretched!
How shall the stretched Superjet compare against CS100?
E-195 can carry 122 seats single class, see
http://www.embraercommercialjets.com/english/content/ejets/emb_195.asp?tela=layouts
Compare maximum 125 seats of CS100
E-195AR has 2200 nm range with 108 seats. Compare 2200 nm range of CS100.
So, they are accomplishing equal missions…
More specifications
More specifications are out:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/03/16/323916/bombardier-divulges-further-details-about-new-cseries.html
CS100 OEW
CS100 range from LCY (1400 nm).
Hopefully other than with the 747-8 and Dornier 728 where LH was the launch customer other customers will follow soon.
How many customers does Dornier 728 have?
Cseries looks a bit like Dornier 728. Two underwing engines. Cabin width is 325 cm on 728 (12 cm wider than DC-9. 17 cm narrower than BAe 146), 3 cm wider (328 cm) on Cseries. Then again, Sukhoi Superjet 100 is also like Dornier 728, with 323 cm wide cabin (2 cm narrower than 728).
C130 was also renamed to CS300. No orders, but Lufthansa still has 30 options of Cseries.
Cseries is delayed, as the EIS date of CS100 is 2014.
I thought it was a fancy term for “take-off, pressurisation in climb, cruise at altitude, depressurisation in descent and landing”, ideally in that approximate order. 🙂
If a plane depressurizes in descent, circles an airport but does not land, then pressurizes again in climbing back to cruise altitude, and then depressurizes again and lands, how many “cycles” have been logged?