Have no idea about the MTOW increase, if possible it will be done later in the program I guess.
Anyway the CS100 is offered with 19k, 21k or 23k lbf engines (84.1, 93.4 and 103.6 kN respectively) while the CS300 is only offered with the 21k and 23k lbf engines.
What is the advantage of PW1521 and 1519 over PW1524?
Anyway: comparing the standard CS100 and base CS300:
they have the exact same MTOW (58 967 kg), same wing, and same engines (PW1524G). The difference is fuselage stretch.
Their take-off distance differs: standard CS100 takes off in 1463 m, base CS300 needs 1524 m.
The causes for difference might be:
the fuselage stretch of CS300 causes extra drag during takeoff run;
the maximum coefficient of lift of CS300 is smaller because of lower rotation angle, limited by the stretched tail, and therefore CS300 needs higher speed to lift off.
Is it known how much the takeoff distance of CSeries is stretched by PW1521 and PW1519 engines?
CSeries is allowed to fly:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/bombardier-cseries-approved-for-first-flight-390036/
When will it make use of that permit? Slow speed taxiing has been done, but before flight, there is still need for high speed taxiing, and rejected takeoffs.
The full MTOW of CS100 is quoted at 58,967 t, not 58,5 t.
My point of MTOW increase was: CS300 has exact same wings as CS100, and also exact same engines (PW1524G, with 103,6 kN thrust each). Yet CS300 manages MTOW of 65,317 t. It would therefore seem to me that if there were any demand to increase CS100 loaded range beyond the standard 5463 km, that could be done with relatively modest modifications. So is there a chance to see a CS100LR, if not with the full 65 t MTOW of CS300, then a more modest MTOW bump?
The tests have been stretched by 3 months:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/cseries-flight-test-programme-extended-into-2015-389738/
Does it mean that CS100 EIS is delayed into 2015? Or does it not? The original 18 month schedule, May 2013 to November 2014, already was supposed to include CS300 – because CS100 was supposed to EIS in June 2014 or so. Does the extension affect CS300 alone, and CS100 is completed in 12 months (by August 2014) or earlier? But why would CS300 then need 9 months testing, and not make do with 6 months as originally planned and adequate for a small stretch of an already tested CS100? Could it be that additional changes have been introduced to CS300, and that would delay CS300 relative to CS100?
Also, how long would Bombardier need to complete as yet undisclosed versions of CSeries, like extra long range (increased MTOW) versions, or CSeries Business Jet? Can they be completed within the May 2015 schedule, or not?
CSeries has taxied!
http://cseries.com/ftv1s-need-for-speed/
The CSeries, imho, could be stretched to an A320-like seat capacity version without loosing too much performance (with existing wings), perhaps a 26k thrust version of the PW1500G could help in keeping performance equal.
MD-80 had no engines stronger than JT8D-219, with just 21k lb. CSeries has 23,3k lb out of box. So how much bigger could CSeries be than the 172 seats of MD-80?
Delayed! To the end of July, so far:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/cseries-first-flight-delayed-to-late-july-for-software-upgrades-387701/
So who is the launch customer, again? Gulf Air, or Malmö Aviation?
Looking at the images of CSeries at:
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5752656/
post 146
The wing area of CSeries is quoted as 112 square m.
The wing area of MD-80 is also 112 square m, although MD-80 has shorter wingspan and therefore wider chord and lower aspect ratio.
How much can CSeries reasonably be stretched with existing wing and engines?
Bombardier promises to expose the 3 secret customers, including the launch customer, at Paris:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-02/bombardier-says-cseries-spurred-by-hot-high-africa-credentials.html
Also Bombardier is looking for “hot and high” customers in Africa… what about Latin America, also high and hot?
40% of flight tests still left to do:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/long-delayed-arj21-certification-set-to-slip-again-386301/
How about flying an unmanned private plane? As in, the solo pilot flies the plane on takeoff and landing, but once the plane is in cruise out of the sterile cockpit, he can leave the plane unmanned to take toilet breaks, meals, go to sleep, spend time in company of other passengers, etc.?
Yes, a pilot operating an international flight operates in airports of the 2 countries connected, and perhaps also the airspace of the countries oveflown (as in this case). And if an obvious criminal is discovered, it is reasonable for any country where he or she is found to detain him or her.
But since the said pilot was defrauding the state of Libya, getting salary in Libya, flying on Libyan flagged planes subject to Libyan civil aviation authorities and breaching Libyan civil aviation regulations, surely he should have been extradited to Libya for trial and punishment?
What standing does Ukogbani have to prosecute him?
Some pictures
See the condition of non-flying frame/s:
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5749323/